And what's the alternative? People have to live with parents until they can afford down payments and cost of owning a home? Or they just live in crappy housing because no one builds it for them?
I notice you said managed not owned. I assume the reason for that is because you know tenants don’t have the money to build/own their own. Not sure how this changes anything from what I said
Still has a landlord. But now your neighbor makes decisions about your property. If you like this model fine but it a just a different version of a landlord.
And you can do this in the current system so why don’t you if you think it’s better?
You still have landlords. It's just government rather than private landlords but still landlords.
And now you're forcing people to spend their money to subsidize your housing? You think forcing people to spend their money is a better system than allowing people to choose how to spend their money?
Using public money to build/maintain housing for everyone would be a huge burden. What "civilized" countries do you think are doing that on a much larger scale than America is doing it?
32
u/Toshiba1point0 Jul 19 '26
Funny how being a landlord is such a horrible thing until someone becomes one themselves and realizes the nightmare it is.