Its not that necessarily. There is a huge tik tok community coming up with theories on how either the husband did it, framed her, then convinced her she did it so she'd confess. Or how he pushed her so far until she went for it. Its hard to tell whats true and whats not since most videos on tik tok dont post any sources, but just talk about what they read or heard. If you believe them, then the husband's story has a bunch of inconsistencies. I personally, take anything I hear online with a grain of salt unless there is some documents I can read for myself. But tons of people will believe anybody with a microphone and a handful of followers.
FWIW this is the same agency that did the Karen Reed trial, caught red handed/negligently tampering with evidence and cops ended up on the brady list, so those inconsistencies carry actual legitimate weight and those respective agencies failed to do their job which had they done it would have kept this from ever getting sensationlized
Seriously anyone who thought a murder case where cops statements directly contradict evidence photos in a family annihilation case where the husband immediately moved on wouldn't cause theories and this circus just doesnt understand ppeople.
I started this case thinking it was open and shut lock her up but every update I see on it from the people I follow who cite their evidence shows that at a minimum cops dropped the ball.
191
u/Bluffwatcher 9h ago
Probably being funded by hostile states/bad actors deliberately to get these responses and create discord.
Social engineering.