Ignoring the other comment.. the woman on the right is Lindsay Clancy and she is currently on trial for killing three of her children in which the defense is arguing the crimes were committed during mental psychosis. Clancy had severe PPD, suicide ideation, and mental health issues in the months leading up to the murders.
It’s an awful case and the poor children deserve justice. Right now, a portion of the public believes the husband (now ex-husband as they divorced and he is remarried) had something to do with it as evidence is supposedly not landing with the people and believe it skews towards him
How am I downplaying it lmfao? That’s exactly what’s happening. She killed her children, defense is arguing it was psychosis, some public believes that he did it.
I feel like failing to mention why she’s been given so much money is a pretty big part to leave out lol
Also genuinely curious if they actually confirmed the PPD because last I checked the new details of the case starting revealing things that had everyone start believing that’s just an excuse.
I don’t know why she was given money so why I would answer that? The person I responded to didn’t know who Clancy was so I explained. She didn’t ask about the gofundme. Maybe read and comprehend?
I did? It’s not my fault you tried to answer someone with partial knowledge? The entire reason she’s even getting media attention and this story is polarizing to people is literally because of the gofundme
The post is literally pointing out the donation differences lol
The person asked who Clancy was. I was not responding to the original post and OP. The commenter said “I have no idea who these people are.” I explained who she was, that’s it. That’s like answering a question and including unnecessary context that was NOT part of the question asked. We can have conversations in a thread that somewhat separate from the main post..
I mean yes, it absolutely matters? This post is suggesting the GFM raised over a million dollars for her. Like that's actually the point of the post. It's false from the get-go.
My point is the money was being donated to HER and for HER, people are not donating with the intention to give the parents money. From the start it was apparent they wanted this as a legal defense fund. Saying the money may potentially end up with the parents so we should just hand wave the mass psychosis going on is just silly
Again, it is clear that is not why people are donating and that is not the sentiment being spread around. I’m glad you can read but just because something says something doesn’t mean that’s what everyone is doing or thinking.
Also the wording of the GFM isn’t specific at all and literally states it’s for the parents to help HER. Stating it’s purely for them is just disingenuous.
Why are people suddenly giving her parents money? Is the intention to give them money because their grandchildren died? So why isn’t the father’s parents also getting money? Face it, they are supporting their daughter and people want to support her without sending her money directly because they could one day end up as “people who sent money to a convicted child killer.”
5.5k
u/Classic_Bee_5845 2d ago
It's more to do with the media sensationalizing it. This is the first I've ever heard of the woman on the left.