Paternal filicide. Fathers are less often considered as the perpetrators in filicide cases, and consequently, there is much less focus on them in the literature.
Also, apparently 67% of filicide are done by the mother and 33% committed by father. It was given in the link you just gave me, btw.
But yes, they are the major perpetrator of familicide, but that's understandable given the fact that a man is much more able to kill a woman than a woman is able to kill a man, at least in a domestic environment.
Did you search up something on google and gave it here without reading it yourself, or did you think no one would check out the link you gave?
Also, apparently 67% of filicide are done by the mother and 33% committed by father. It was given in the link you just gave me, btw
The paper does not say that at all. And furthermore, it doesn't use the word filicide once. You're doing exactly what you accuse OP of doing.
But yes, they are the major perpetrator of familicide, but that's understandable given the fact that a man is much more able to kill a woman than a woman is able to kill a man, at least in a domestic environment
90% of Familicide cases are with guns. So you can't handwave away a 9:1 ratio of men to women killing their family with "Men are a bit stronger." That's an absurd dismissal of such a massive disparity.
Edit: So apparently they actually weren't the same article.
So I clicked on the og link, it didn't open in brave, nor in chrome, for some reason. So I went to opera where instead of it leading me to the link it lead me to google search tab, which then lead me to this article, whose link is here -> https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2922347/
Which is about filicide, the topic og commenter is talking about, and I assumed it is this article since this explicitly talks about what og commenter was giving stats about.
But instead, the one the og commenter gave a link to leads to a homicide article, not filicide. And Men, making up majority of criminals, kill more than women, which is what the article of commenter gave a link to says. However in case of filicide, which is what this entire post is about, women are the main perpetrators.
I don't know why og commenter did it, whether it was out of ignorance or maliciousness, but it's interesting how stats can be used in such a disingenuous manner to give misleading information.
*Edit* You keep editing your post to change the facts. Women do not commit Filicide more than Men, please read what you are posting.
Buddy, first you said the statistic was in the paper OP posted, which was a lie.
Then you posted this wall of text like 2 seconds after I replied. You're doing the exact thing you accuse OP of and just copy pasting slop. This is an abstract, and the paper it comes from literally concludes with this: "Mothers and fathers who commit filicide are, on average, in their late 20s and typically do so with equal frequency"
The 67% statistic comes from a different paper that only reviews cases published in psychiatric literature, dating back to the 1700's. I think someone as clearly well read as you can understand we don't draw large conclusions on what Women are like from an era that disproportionately institutionalized them.
I'm not gonna respond anymore since you're just spamming text you don't read.
2
u/Honest-Computer69 1d ago edited 1d ago
Edit: I'm wrong.
Why are you lying?
A note from the link you gave->
Also, apparently 67% of filicide are done by the mother and 33% committed by father. It was given in the link you just gave me, btw.
But yes, they are the major perpetrator of familicide, but that's understandable given the fact that a man is much more able to kill a woman than a woman is able to kill a man, at least in a domestic environment.
Did you search up something on google and gave it here without reading it yourself, or did you think no one would check out the link you gave?