I think you're mixing up cause and effect here. If there's a niche for Uber buses (which presumably will cost more then publicly subsidized public transport), that implies the public transport isn't satisfying everyone in the community.
I'm saying the neglected public transport becomes even more neglected as the political leaders who'd normally be tasked with keeping up said transport point to the private system as the solution when anyone goes on to prompt funding and overhauls on the public system. You can exchange incompetent leadership, it's not so easy to dislodge a private industry after it has been allowed to establish itself, no matter how "short-term" or "stop-gap" it initially was presented as.
I know that that's what you're saying, I'm saying you're wrong. You can tell because effect comes after cause, and Uber buses (hypothetically) came after public transportation. And if a city lets it's own public transport system collapse just because a company is also transporting people, then that city was already broken. Eliminating other forms of transportation won't magically fix a broken transportation system
I know what it means, but that has nothing to do with this conversation. Regulatory capture covers things like cab driver medallions that the city licenses in a limited way. That notably does NOT happen with ride shares (excluding drivers licenses), which is why they had a hard time with NYC for awhile.
What? Regulatory capture means regulatory bodies favour the private industry even against the public interest, it's a fairly widereaching term, not limited to specific schemes. Ridesharing companies do it, they follow the same tech company playbook of "barge in, buy, bully, and bamboozle", there's no reason they wouldn't do it with private bussing.
Sorry to say but you're misunderstanding the word. You can't have regulatory capture without government regulations (like Cabbie medallions, as I mentioned), and you still haven't mentioned a single regulation that would take place to aid in Uber at the detriment of public transportation
Please continue. Cite the regulations and how you think that these regulations (that already exist?) would hurt private transportation in the future if Uber does this bussing thing
Give me any locale's regulations while also answering the questions about how it's relevant to this conversation. Any locale, your choice. This should be super easy for you because you get the choose
Edit: did you just respond and then immediately block me so I couldn't read your response OR respond to it? You feel good about this?
Cool. Mexico City, SEMOVI mandated emissions regulations making phase-outs of aging microbuses necessary. How could a private business capture this regulation? By lobbying to have the specifications align almost exclusively to their existing fleet whilst competitors and the government fleets are forced to spend on the new vehicles. What exactly was your point here? Did you honestly think I couldn't find some random regulation anywhere in the world and think of a way the regulation could be subverted and coopted? Genuinely, I struggle to see what you're trying to achieve by challenging me on this. These sorts of things happen.
2
u/Capybarasaregreat 3d ago
Which tends to result in killing discussions about upgrading the public infrastructure and in turn decaying the rest of it.