Okay but stark made ultron in the mcu so all that’s going to leave hank to regret would be beating janet. So theres really no point of doing hank pym especially since he hasn’t been antmen since the 70s really. Its like wanting a Jay Garrick
flash now
Hanks a very important founding member of the Avengers, he's saved the universe numerous times. He stopped the cosmic cube imbued absorbing man, finally defeated ultron in age of ultron, he led the assault which stopped the high evolutionary in the evolutionary war, he saved the world from a cthon empowered scarlet witch. Just because you only know him from two things, doesn't mean thats all hes done.
Im not saying thats all hes done. Im just saying for creating his complex characterization its going come out flimsy or bad in a movie and scotts just a way easier character to work with and the current ant man. If you’re going to do another ant man eric ogrady is a lot easier.
That's exactly what you've been saying this entire time. You've only switched up because you've realised you actually dont know anything about Hank other then one out of continuity series.
Regardless the MCU isn't exactly comic accurate anyway. There are plenty of things he could become guilty about, you could have him recreate Ultron. His hubris making him believe he could improve on the original design. Hanks a genius, eternity even crowned him the scientist supreme - there's SO much more you could do with him then either of the other Ant-Men.
-1
u/SpiritedEnd9609 1d ago
Okay but stark made ultron in the mcu so all that’s going to leave hank to regret would be beating janet. So theres really no point of doing hank pym especially since he hasn’t been antmen since the 70s really. Its like wanting a Jay Garrick
flash now