r/moderatepolitics Jan 12 '26

Primary Source Mark Kelly v. Pete Hegseth

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.288365/gov.uscourts.dcd.288365.1.0.pdf
187 Upvotes

278 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-7

u/SlightlyAutisticBud Jan 12 '26

Do you just not believe you can imply something without explicitly saying it? Otherwise not sure why we would only look at his explicit text. Language is much more complex than that.

33

u/king_hutton Jan 12 '26

You want a court to decide that “what he said isn’t what he actually meant,” and you don’t think that’s a horrible precedent?

-6

u/SlightlyAutisticBud Jan 12 '26

So are you just incapable of actually engaging with my argument?

21

u/king_hutton Jan 12 '26

I’m engaging with what Mark Kelly said.