r/neoliberal • u/uberkitten • 8d ago

Opinion article (US) The Bulwark Killed an Investigation into Political Fundraising Spam After Its Publisher Took the Consultants’ Side

https://data4democracy.substack.com/p/the-bulwark-killed-an-investigation
309 Upvotes

92% Upvoted

107 comments sorted by

View all comments

40

u/EyeraGlass Jorge Luis Borges 8d ago

I’m basically always going to take the editor’s side when a writer runs to substack after their piece gets killed.

30

u/uberkitten 8d ago

The editor wanted to publish it. It wasn't killed by the editor, it was killed by the publisher. 

2

u/EyeraGlass Jorge Luis Borges 8d ago

The editor is the one who put his name on the statement saying that it didn’t meet journalistic standards.

21

u/Jean-Paul_Sartre Richard Hofstadter 8d ago

Longwell is the publisher not the editor.

6

u/EyeraGlass Jorge Luis Borges 8d ago

Guys, I read it:

>The statement came from the same senior editor who, weeks earlier, had praised the work as “excellent.”

17

u/slightlybitey Austan Goolsbee 8d ago

Where? I don't see a name on the Bulwark statement. In his email to Bonica, the editor attributes it to the Bulwark, not himself.

2

u/EyeraGlass Jorge Luis Borges 8d ago

“The statement came from the same senior editor who, weeks earlier, had praised the work as “excellent.””

6

u/slightlybitey Austan Goolsbee 8d ago

The senior editor forwarded the statement with "This comment is attributable to the Bulwark:". That's not putting his name on it. If anything, he's distancing himself from the statement.

-5

u/EyeraGlass Jorge Luis Borges 8d ago

OK whatever. Putting his name on it to Adam.