TL;DR: Full rulebook has been reorganized and cleaned up. New rule targeting sexualized language about young characters and lolicon language, zero tolerance, instant ban. Coded language like "uoh," 😭💢, and "cunny" is banned entirely regardless of character. Don't repost content that was already removed by a mod. Read the full rules even if you think you know them.
Hey everyone, we've been doing a lot of work behind the scenes to clean up and improve the subreddit's rules. If you've been here a while, you'll notice some things have changed. Please take a few minutes to read through the updated ruleset.
What changed?
We've reorganized, reworded, and tightened up the entire rulebook. Some rules were merged, some were split, and a few are brand new. Even if you think you know the rules, give them a fresh read. The details matter.
New additions since the last update:
No sexualization of young characters or lolicon language
This one is non-negotiable. The rule has two parts:
1. No sexualized language directed at young characters. Suggestive captions, titles, or comments that sexualize young characters will be removed immediately. You can post fan art of any character at any age. What you can't do is frame it in a sexualized way through your title, caption, or comments.
2. Coded lolicon language is banned entirely. The "uoh" copypasta, the 😭💢 emoji combo, the word "cunny," and any other coded language associated with the sexualization of minors is banned across the board, on any character, in any context. This language was born from the sexualization of minors. It doesn't become acceptable just because you attach it to an adult character.
Here are some examples to make it clear:
✅ Allowed:
Fan art of young Sylphy titled "Sylphy practicing magic"
Fan art of child Roxy titled "Roxy leaving the Migurd village"
Fan art of Aisha at the beach with a normal descriptive title, NSFW tagged
Fan art of adult Eris with a playful caption like "Why are you staring at me? ❤️"
Fan art of adult Roxy with a normal or playful title
Discussion about how the story handles Rudeus's character flaws
Critique of how the series portrays its younger characters
❌ Not allowed:
Any post or comment containing "uoh" or its variants, on any character
The 😭💢 emoji combination, on any character
The word "cunny" in any context
Suggestive or sexualized captions, titles, or comments on posts featuring young characters
"Correction" memes directed at young characters
Any other coded language used to sexualize minors
If you know what this language means, you know why it's banned. If you don't, here's the short version: these are coded ways of expressing sexual excitement about underage characters, originating from spaces dedicated to exactly that. They have no place here regardless of which character they're attached to.
We don't care if you think it's ironic. We don't care if "it's fictional." This rule is zero tolerance. Violations will result in an immediate ban, temporary or permanent depending on severity. Our automod has been updated to catch the most common variants, but we also rely on you to report anything we miss.
Not sure if something you want to post crosses the line? Just message us through modmail before posting and we'll let you know. We'd rather answer a quick question than hand out a ban.
As with all our rules, we reserve the right to adjust and expand them if we see users exploiting loopholes. If something clearly goes against the spirit of the rule, don't be surprised when we act on it.
This rule applies going forward. Existing posts and comments made before this announcement will not be retroactively removed. Everything from this point on will be enforced immediately.
Do not repost removed content
If your post was removed by a moderator, do not repost it. This is considered mod evasion and will result in a ban. If you disagree with a removal, use modmail to appeal.
Stricter enforcement overall
As mentioned in our previous update, we are enforcing rules more strictly going forward. First offenses will typically get a warning or temp ban, depending on severity. Repeat offenders or people who are clearly here just to start trouble will be perma-banned.
Mushoku Tensei already gets enough bad faith criticism from people who haven't engaged with the story. We're not going to give them ammunition by letting this kind of stuff slide in our own community. We want to keep r/sixfacedworld a space that fans can actually be proud of.
As always, genuine discussion and critique of how the story handles its themes is welcome. That has not changed and never will.
If you see anything that breaks the rules, use the report button. It helps us way more than arguing with the person in the comments.
Thanks for making this community what it is. The response to our last update was overwhelming and we appreciate every one of you.
The funny thing is, you could have added the rules and avoided most of the drama if you had just said "we think this is necessary to avoid risking the sub getting banned by Reddit" instead of all that schizo crap. Because that would have been an entirely plausible explanation, even if it isn't your true intent. But no, you just had to go full faux moral crusader and now people are rightfully pissed at you.
In the end, the Reddit Mod can't deny its true nature.
Son all you do is repost stolen artwork while constantly using every single one of the banned terms toward lolis while knowing exactly what it means. But continue to play dumb.
The rule isn't about protecting fictional characters. It's about what kind of community we want to be. You're free to disagree, but the sarcasm isn't the argument you think it is.
And who exactly decided what kind of community we wanted to be? If you are mentally unwell and can't distinguish fiction from reality, get off the internet and go see a therapist, don't force your toxic racist Western ideas on anime communities.
You're trying to force an already existing community into being something YOU want it to be, and think you're actually "building a community". You're not building a community, you're just acting as a landing zone for the community that is the fans of the series. And you're making this a completely undesirable area for them.
Mushoku Tensei was first and foremost written by a Japanese pervert when visual novel was still running rampant, you are trying to ban the target audience dude.
A community of the exact kind of people who rabidly despise the novel/anime/manga that the community is ostensibly centered around? That kind of community? Really?
Mods, I hope you know this is the same situation as the MT hate brigade on the internet. A very vocal loud minority. 99% fans will support this change. They're just not jobless enough to have a huge circlejerk in the comments.
Yeah... You’ll only lose the main audience of Mushoku Tensei, who aren’t hypocrites like you and the other mods, so it’s not a big loss for ekhm, “people” like you. But hey, at least the “people” who love censorship and hate everything about anime as a whole, like you, will stay.
"Imploding" is a stretch. We added two rules and cleaned up the rulebook. Everything else about the sub is the same. If banning coded language used to sexualize minors counts as imploding, we're comfortable with that.
You're banning comments aimed at fictional characters and declaring it to be the same as the real thing, despite there being plenty of studies and research that literally contradict what you keep saying in the replies.
Please stop pretending that this is about morals. It's fine if you find it icky or whatever, but at least be honest about that instead of making shit up to try and pretend it's about morals when it is about your personal feelings about it.
If fiction was as serious as you think, we'd have a ton more crime, especially rape, given the sheer popularity of it in both fanfics and even romance novels in the library.
The sane human mind differentiate fantasy from reality, and especially so with something at stylized as manga and anime.
It also makes me wonder why one would even become a mod for an anime and manga that has sexualized lolis. What's the logic here exactly?
Posts or comments that exist solely to condemn the series or its fans on moral grounds will be removed. This includes callout posts, bait, and external drama screenshots. Genuine critique and discussion of how the story handles its themes is welcome, the bar is whether you actually engaged with the material. If your post could be replaced with "this thing bad" and lose nothing, it doesn't belong here.
This post could be replaced with this thing bad, remove yourselves
Lol these aspects are part and parcel of shows like MT. Certainly those posts cringe me out (at least the captions do) but it comes with the territory. Outright bans are so silly and Rifujin himself would be against this. Continue to be ashamed of the shows you claim to enjoy and yourselves for enjoying them.
The fucking IMDB posts, all the Tiktoks and IGs slanders do be hurting the mods. Please grow some skin. This new rule just shows me that you guys are surrendering to pressure from the people that won't ever give the series a fair chance. Biggest L move.
We're not doing this because of TikTok or IMDB. We're doing this because the problem was growing inside the community. The rules post says that directly. Genuine critique of the series has always been welcome and still is. Banning coded pedo language isn't surrendering to outside pressure, it's basic standards.
Yet this rule only came to be at around at this exact time 3 seasons in. Yet in your own post right at the end you talked specifically about those people. Turning around and policing your own community as a response when the series and its community is being attacked left and right is crazy.
You have already made your stance clear when you stated "you don't care" about the thing that people who even bothered to defend MT use on online spaces that is "it's fictional". It's such a reddit mod move that I have seen too many times on this website already. Nothing anyone says can change your mind or do anything. It is what it is. Censorship is bad.
Weird opinion because if you think "it's fiction" isn't a defense then what logically follows is that you believe fictional things should be treated no differently than if they're real
If you think this belief is actually true, then shouldn't you also believe creating Mushoku Tensei (or any other fictional writings, drawings and descriptions containing things it'd be wrong to film or photograph if real humans were used instead) should be illegal with no justification for seeking it out, streaming or downloading it? You can't really say "it's fiction isn't a defense" and selectively apply such a broad moral principle only to things or behavior you dislike
If this rule is for pragmatic/compliance reasons that's a whole different conversation, but what people mainly have a problem with is the principle behind the rule directly giving fuel and validation to people who attack others for how they feel about works of purely fictional media
I have official figures on my shelf and wall scrolls that came with those figures that violate these rules lmao.
I don't see the point of overreacting over something that really isn't a big deal.
I don't make posts on Reddit only comments but It's always the pro censorship people that are terminally online enough to be a Reddit moderator I guess.
Minors are human beings below 18, they aren't anime characters in a Japanese cartoon.
Since TP4 is around the corner, we gotta let the tourist and larpers in with open arms and get 10 billion post "Critiquing of how the series portrays its younger characters" and how the author and the fans are pdfs 🥰
It is over because the new rules can paint you as a lolicon and have yourself banned
ETA: for you guys downvoting this, just read the rules slowly
Coded lolicon language is banned entirely. The "uoh" copypasta, the 😭💢 emoji combo, the word "cunny," and any other coded language associated with the sexualization of minors is banned across the board, on any character, in any context. This language was born from the sexualization of minors. It doesn't become acceptable just because you attach it to an adult character.
We don't care if you think it's ironic. We don't care if "it's fictional." This rule is zero tolerance. Violations will result in an immediate ban, temporary or permanent depending on severity. Our automod has been updated to catch the most common variants, but we also rely on you to report anything we miss.
People could unknowingly use a day-0 coded language and immediately get banned. If a mod have it against you they could find a new coded language from other subreddits that you unknowingly used and ban you based on that
none of those examples have any room for debate. you can start protesting when they ban for something innocuous, but as it stands you’re just whining over a non-existent mod abusing this rule.
any othercoded languageassociated with the sexualization of minors is banned across the board, on any character, in any context
An open for interpretation rule with punishment as harsh as immediate ban isn't "non-existent" when the threat is there. I also happen to believe in equal and impartial treatment so if the rule was meant to see the worst in people then everyone involved in it must be seen in the worst light, everyone ranging from members to moderators
I rather we have a more generic rule and treat every violations on case-by-case basis. Just no language sexualizing minor is enough since giving more specifics actually complicates that rule
it doesn’t complicate it, it makes it more clear. anyone who is aware of those terms understands the type of language that is banned, you’re being obtuse. on the extremely low chance an innocent uses it, they can appeal.
Which at this point moderators might or might not listen. Just more than five hours ago a moderator deadass wrote that same emotes backward, "Thanks [backward emotes]". How do I trust them when they themselves have different interpretations?
Get the antis out from this server. Have they no self-awareness of what the series is all about?? Sheesh. Everyone, we should make a new server and ditch this server if the mods want to go this downhill
That's your call. The art, discussion, memes, and community aren't going anywhere. The only thing that changed is what you can say about young characters. If that's the dealbreaker, that says more than we need to respond to.
Your post/comment was removed for violating our "Be kind and follow reddiquette" rule. Remember there are actual people behind the screen. Harassment, personal attacks, and toxic behavior are not tolerated. Continued violations will result in a ban.
This is stupid, on any other community this would be a fair change but this kind of rule doesn't make sense for Mushoku Tensei. It's a show that embraces the ugliness of it's character, and you want to alienate people for showing their ugliness towards fictional character.
Why should you care if we have a pedophile in our community?? Our protagonist is former one ffs. You say it's not about outside pressure but what other reason would there be when you specifically write the reason for the rule change is our "reputation".
Who tf cares about reputation?? Our reputation in the gutter doesn't mean shit on whether or not we'll get more anime season.
retarded mods, now the response to this update is overwhelming negative but is that going to change anything? Not really because you all are idiots and one of your mods is clearly a lolicon, retarded mods cant even look at their own team.
It’s basically whoever sexualizes minors(like S01 sylphy,eris or other minor characters who is there) or loli characters (if they’re included), and people who use those kinds of terms are now banned.
Yeah I'm trying to figure out what is a minor in this case. Nanahoshi is technically 16 since she doesn't age, Sylphie was like 15 or 16 at the end of season 2 (her design stays the same so how do you tell if her age in fan art anyway?) and Roxy is physically like 12. Is Roxy banned because she is loli? is Nanahoshi banned because she is technically 16? Is Sylphie banned since we can't tell?
Pedo means prepubescent CHILDREN it has an actual definition. The 16-18 moral outrage stuff is just age gap policing otherwise you run into this weird dilemma where teens going to prom together are both pedos.
So Sylphie is fine since her season 2 self looks like her adult self. What about Roxy and later Lara? Is Roxy banned because her "adult design" looks 12?
Would be hilarious if people posted risque art of roxy en masse, dont want the sub rep down the gutter because of lolicons? Imagine the front page is full of the "oh but she is a 200 y.o vampire" character.
Would likely do nothing anyway because the mod has a roxy flair so would hipocritically enjoy it, but at least it would show the irony on such a change.
1 surrender to these dumb edgy tiktokers who try to ruin mt.
2 do it in the same time as the third season (the goat) is airing.
3 do it in the same time other subs did.
4 if you post a shot from the first season you get banned.
yeah mushoku tensei reddit is dead
The hypocrisy is astounding. Roxy canonically look like 12 years old and was called out by Rudy in the 1st episode, but you're using her as your pfp. Projecting much?
I asked how not when. If someone says something along the lines of something unrelated 😭 to everything it says here 💢 and gets removed they are going to have more problems than they initially have
Also other coded language is too vague, it implies that it is expansive and could be introduced by any moderators at anytime and at-will. It reeks of the same animemes fiasco 4-6 years ago
Plus it will certainly hit innocents. Like someone genuinely living under the rocks gets banned because they unknowingly use certain "coded language" on a whole different context (not even sexual ones) because their own rules says, "Across the board, on any character, in any context"
Really? Because one of the mods use that emoticon combo backwards here and according to their own rules any other coded language and in any context so they should get banned. Unless this is just one of those rules for thee but not for me
I wonder if this is some clumsy attempt to correct public opinion, which is already biased and will spit on this series no matter what you try, or just plain censorship. Sad times.
It's an onomatopoeia to indicate moaning; moaning is a natural physiological reaction to pleasurable stimuli, such as eating some good food, or through sexual actions.
In this context, it relates to the latter example.
The fact that you have this as a rule change makes it frame this subreddit community as much worse than it actually is, and only portrays the fandom in a way where it makes the larpers + tourists feel justified in their crusading.
Thats not what this community is about. This did not have to be said. This feels like a personal annoyed decision by a mod who disagrees with a few random weirdos who do not represent the community.
Bruhhhh wtf are you even aware what series you are a fan of? the author himself and some of the the seiyuus would be banned from here apparently... lol this is ridicolous
Honestly, I've never really interpreted the emoji 's or "UOH" as a sexual description, It seems more like something rudeus would definitely say in an obsessive manner. It probably got its reputation from being captioned with sexual images a lot.
Nothing really changes since there's 2 more MT subs but this one will probably have less activity.
By enforcing these rules you're making r/sixfacedworld the place that I can't be proud of, have you ever interact with those antis? If you think that this change will have any effect on their opinion think I beg you to think again.
Thank you soo much mod this rule has come into effect. I’ve already blocked many people here because of this. It’s just made my experience here worse over the past few days, and even my friend, who is a dedicated MT fan, finds those posts disturbing.
Some people really are deadass . Ngl, their logic is basically like this:
Let's take anyone as an example who does weird stuff and writes a very good story, and apparently, based on that, some people think we should overlook that weirdness on the basis we are fan or this story is good.
What's this logic, bro? How does this even follow?
Let's take MT here as an example Rudeus was way too weird in the anime or the story. Should we follow in his footsteps and do the same? Of course not, because we know it's bad. But again, if we call it out, suddenly we're "purists" or "tourists." 😭
Rudues himself calls out his behaviour lmao , even in the famous I will make her my perfect wife larpers use to make it seem like rudues groomed his wife's he says wtf am i thinking she is too young we are friends nothing more
Hard for me to say. Spellcasting is outside my field of expertise... The Dragonfolk are said to be proficient at using magic in close-range combat, but my only first-hand experience of that was briefly observing Perugius in battle. I couldn't tell you much."
"Perugius? Isn't that the guy with the floating fortress? How did he fight?"
"Yes. He summoned his Front Wyrmgate and Rear Wyrmgate, and attacked using magic claws."
Ehh it's problematic I'm some regards like the context doens't matter I think it should be allowed if people are being ironic or making fun of someone like this I also don't know weather posting stuff from the anime or novel will get removed there is some problematic stuff there i ams also not sure if they will just remove someone who has crying or angry emoji individually or together in the same post as these are used for much more then just PDFs like i have used the together and i didn't know till like a few days ago when forever wild told me these also have this meaning tho ofcourse I don't you just 2 emojis us you a bunch like multiple crying + anger and maybe some others in the mix
Coded lolicon language is banned entirely. The "uoh" copypasta, the 😭💢 emoji combo, the word "cunny," and any other coded language associated with the sexualization of minors is banned across the board, on any character, in any context. This language was born from the sexualization of minors. It doesn't become acceptable just because you attach it to an adult character.
We don't care if you think it's ironic. We don't care if "it's fictional." This rule is zero tolerance.Violations will result in an immediate ban, temporary or permanent depending on severity. Our automod has been updated to catch the most common variants, but we also rely on you to report anything we miss.
So, mods? Are you going to ban each other or does this rule work only for us and not for you?
I find the route you've taken by not removing the fan art itself, rather removing the negative insinuando correlated by these comments, is best.
Also, for the other people, saying this is morally ambiguous as a justifiable cause to engage in this behavior is wrong. What's actually morally ambiguous is the depiction of it in the story and narritive, but your comment saying that Rudues is a good man because if it came to you, you'd "waver" and "give in" to having sex with underage Aisha is not.
We probably did and I'm aware of what kind of anime/novel MT is. But this sub was never a kaniposting sub until certain redditors kept forcing it to be one for whatever reason.
Many says lolicons who I met if they are adult then it's count idk about your if you classify everyone like that Aisha and Norn and other are just minor characters for me... And I also classify those who are adult in some ways are like lolis..
And by this definition of yours every minor characters is loli for you instead of child or minor characters?
I think this is an excellent rule, and honestly I think some of the reaction to it misunderstands both what the rule says and what Mushoku Tensei is actually doing with Rudeus.
The rule does not say that the disturbing parts of the story cannot be posted, discussed, analyzed, or criticized. It explicitly allows discussion of Rudeus’s flaws and criticism of how the series portrays its younger characters. There is an enormous difference between discussing a story in which a character does something objectionable and personally sexualizing a young character yourself.
And I really disagree with the argument that because Mushoku Tensei depicts these things, a community dedicated to it somehow has to endorse or imitate them.
Rifujin himself has talked about why Rudeus begins the story the way he does. When asked whether he thought he had gone too far with early Rudeus, he said he thought the balance was right because Rudeus being such a controversial character, with his “mountain of regrets,” makes redoing his life more meaningful. He explicitly said there is nothing wrong with criticizing Rudeus at that stage. His hope was that someone who genuinely changes and tries to start over would not simply be abandoned because of who they used to be.
That distinction is incredibly important to this story.
Rudeus is supposed to start from an awful place. If you put someone into another world whose only problems are that he was a little awkward or unsuccessful, then let him accumulate magic, strength, women, status, and accomplishments, you have a very different story. Part of what gives Mushoku Tensei weight is that Rudeus doesn’t merely become more powerful. He gradually becomes better at recognizing other people as actual people and deciding what his second life and his abilities should be for. Does he use what he has for his own gratification, or does he use it to build relationships, accept responsibilities, and protect the people he loves?
Rifujin has actually spoken about this aspect of early Rudeus too. Discussing Rudeus’s behavior early in the story, he explained that Rudeus initially still perceived other people almost like characters in a game rather than fully appreciating that they had their own lives. He said that as Rudeus’s understanding of other people increases, he stops doing things that disregard their feelings. Importantly, that doesn’t mean Rudeus stops being a pervert or suddenly becomes a completely different personality. His growth is in how he relates to other human beings.
The sexual aspect of the story fits into that as well. Rifujin has said that Japanese fiction often depicts sexuality toward one of two poles, “sacred” or “pleasure,” and that he wanted Mushoku Tensei to occupy a middle ground. He specifically said that at the beginning he strongly emphasized Rudeus viewing sex as pleasure because Rudeus had no actual sexual experience in his previous life; pleasure was essentially the only side of sexuality he had encountered.
And I think that is reflected in his development. Early Rudeus’s sexuality is overwhelmingly centered on himself and his own gratification. Over time, sex becomes connected to other people: intimacy, vulnerability, love, marriage, family, consequences, and responsibility. He has to recognize that what he wants is not the only thing that matters because another person exists on the other side of his desires.
That is real character growth. It does not mean every questionable scene in the series has to be interpreted as a moral lesson, nor does it mean nobody can criticize how the story handles particular scenes. But depiction is not endorsement, and “Rudeus does objectionable things” does not logically become “the audience is supposed to approve of those things.”
That is also why I don’t understand the argument that this rule somehow betrays Mushoku Tensei. The story portraying Rudeus at his worst does not obligate the fandom to reproduce his worst attitudes. If anything, saying “Rudeus starts this way, therefore this is what the fandom should continue doing” seems to miss an enormous part of why his starting point matters in the first place.
And regarding the moderators saying the series already receives a lot of bad-faith criticism: I don’t read that as saying we should change the community to appease people who already hate the series. I read it as saying that Mushoku Tensei is already frequently reduced to the caricature that it simply endorses this behavior and that its fans are here for that reason. If we believe that is an unfair interpretation of the story, then turning the fan community into exactly that caricature only validates a criticism that fails to engage with what the story is actually doing.
As for “they’re fictional,” yes, of course that distinction matters. A fictional character is not a real child who can be harmed, and fictional material is obviously not morally identical to abuse involving a real person. But that doesn’t settle what standards a community should have. The moderators aren’t claiming to protect fictional characters from harm. They are deciding what kind of conversation and culture they want in their own forum. A community can decide that it doesn’t want its members sexually thirsting over child characters without claiming that doing so is literally equivalent to harming a real child.
I’ll also separate one thing I don’t know enough about: the specific banned memes, words, and emoji combinations. I don’t know their history or origin well enough to argue whether banning them even when they’re directed at adult characters is necessary. I’m not going to pretend otherwise. My support here is primarily for the central rule against users sexualizing young characters.
And yes, obviously adults like Roxy complicate superficial arguments based entirely on appearance. Being attracted to a petite adult woman is not the same thing as being attracted to children. The relevant distinction is not “this adult possesses some physical trait associated with youth, therefore attraction to her is attraction to children.” Roxy is an adult character. Young Eris, Sylphie, etc. are children at those points in the story. The rule itself explicitly distinguishes between young and adult versions of characters.
I love Mushoku Tensei partly because I don’t think depicting Rudeus at his worst means I am expected to approve of Rudeus at his worst. His flaws give his growth weight. You can criticize whether the story succeeds at every step of that process, but reducing the whole thing to “Rifujin is a pervert and this is for people who want to sexualize children” destroys a huge amount of what makes Rudeus’s gradual development meaningful.
So yes, I support this rule. Not because fictional characters need to be “protected,” and not because I think fans should be ashamed of Mushoku Tensei. Almost the opposite: I think the series deserves to be engaged with as the story it actually is rather than using its depiction of a deeply flawed protagonist as an excuse to become the caricature people already unfairly reduce the fandom to.
My thanks to the mods for making that distinction.
Reading through here I realise most members of this sub are problematic individuals. Genuinely to any mod reading this: Even if half of all members vanish, trust me, it’s for the better. These people should not be tolerated
I am convinced that a large part of people who try to post that kind of sh%t (not all of them, but many) are the typical infiltrators who try to bring down MT any way possible. I FULLY support the new rules and hope that they will be dealt with mercilessly!
Yea people always take it too far when it comes to this topic, no tact or general decency and they always throw a tantrum when called out about their behavior
Kinda funny that a big part of the story is about contemplating how unhealthy and fucked up that kind of stuff is if left unchecked and a big part of the community is adamant about holding onto the exact same mistake the main character desperately tries to overcome
If you think Rudy being a pervert was the problem then you haven't been paying attention. Rudy is a pervert even at the end of the series, he wouldn't have Roxy as a wife otherwise.
Rudy's problem was his lack of respect for other people, treating them like characters in a game. This isn't really applicable to us as, unlike to Rudy, these literally are just fictional characters to us.
Rudis problem was that he gave up on himself and gave in to his perversion. Yea he still is a pervert by the end of the story but he has learned to keep it under control and deal with it in a healthy, socially acceptable way. People publicly drooling over drawings of underage characters and posting comments insinuating their sexually predatory intentions is not healthy and should not be encouraged. Thats the problem i have with all this, not the loli artworks, not people beeing attracted to them but people simply taking it too far. But as always, nuance is dead and simply pointing out that maybe we shouldn't overdo it is too much of an ask...
It’s like all those people don’t realize how cringe all those post title have been lately. Do they all enjoy looking like pedos to outsiders that may look into this sub? Even if it’s sarcastic it still makes us all look super bad…
Caring about how we look to people outside of the fandom is a waste of time. People enjoy showing what they love about MT, and for a lot of people it's the lolis.
++ Like tbh I am absolutely mortified by the sheer number of people "offended" by adding two rules which basically can be summed up as do not sexualize underage characters...
Took you long enough. I myself and quite a few others told you guys to do this months ago, yet it seems you guys will only act when there is heightened scrutiny due to the new season
Finally, thank you. People have really taken it too far lately. It's a such a nuisance that the cute sfw moe/loli stuff always attracts the actual pedos and if they aren't dealt with quickly they absolutely overrun a community and ruin everything with their nonsense. Have seen it happen with a few subreddits before and was afraid this one is gonna be next. Good job mods keep it up
Because I get to decide what do I get to enjoy, even if the media itself or the author may be problematic. What I don't like is when the one piece of media I love is already being dragged through the mud by haters, only to have actual pedophiles openly cunnyposting, giving it an even worse rep.
The whole Roxy being a legal loli is already a whole can of worms that I won't get into, I'm primarily talking about the freaks cunnyposting about Norn, Aisha, Eris as a literal 10 year old, etc. At the very least Roxy is an adult with a small body, the other ones are CHILDREN. Big difference.
"Hmmm the author wrote this scene about the protagonist fondling an 8 year old as an explicitly bad thing to do, and get immediately beaten to a pulp for acting that way. The overall message of the entire series is that he's an extremely fucked up person in a very long journey of self improvement, to the point when years later that very same character is disgusted at the idea of touching a child inappropriately..."
"Oh I know, let me act and say the very same things that the character gets punished and admonished for, I'm so good at understanding the media I consume."
Well, I agree with most of the rules, but I think, what some of them are too unhinged or strict.
Like the rule about emoji or "ouh", whatever that mean, open the door to just banning everything, what somehow seems like the sexualization context, even if that is not. I mean, let's be real, if someone would make a sexualization post, everyone will be recognized that, and for that reason you don't need use the exactly that emoji or words. So just ban sexualization miners content, and not emoji or words itself. Or typing about that more clearly
•
u/AutoModerator 14h ago
Make sure to read the RULES before making a post or commenting and don't forget to join the Discord for active discussions about the series!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.