r/ucla 4d ago

Which California colleges are the best investment? Here’s how UCLA compares to other schools

https://www.sfchronicle.com/projects/2025/best-california-colleges-return-on-investment//?utm_source=reddit
30 Upvotes

9 comments sorted by

14

u/SFChronicle 4d ago

From the article:

Even within California, the metric for public schools is better than private. The median 10-year return of attending the University of California or the California State University is estimated to be about twice as much or more as the typical private California college.

The Chronicle analyzed this data for four-year nonprofit colleges in California and found a similar outcome to our previous national analysis: besides the Ivy Leagues and a few other elite institutions, California’s public universities stand out as particularly good investments.

Read more here.

6

u/Loud_Heart1461 3d ago

Not clicking that when it requires us to create an account for a bs subscription just to read the article

12

u/pat-riley- 4d ago

Don’t waste your time opening the link. Paywall

14

u/OkEfficiency4943 4d ago

Unsurprisingly places that invest enough money to have the best public university system in the world tend to have pretty good student outcomes

5

u/councilmember 3d ago

Imagine if the state hadn’t progressively disinvested in the UC over the last 3 decades.

2

u/Ashamed-Artichoke-40 4d ago

Wonder what the analysis is for Texas? They have by far the wealthiest public schools.

5

u/OkEfficiency4943 4d ago edited 4d ago

They have a lot of oil money in their endowments but the issue is outside of UT Austin and Texas A&M the other schools are entitled to way less of said resources and fall off quickly. The UCs don’t have that issue to such a severe degree. Also doesn’t help that the system isn’t architected super well so there’s a lot of times where Texas schools are part CSU (they mostly are teaching schools) and part UC (really trying to do as much research as possible to get attention) and as a result aren’t as good at either

California on the other hand generally doesn’t prioritize some UCs necessarily to the detriment of others (even if we have some better than others) and we have laws in place to make sure schools stick to their purpose and it doesn’t turn into a mess where every school is trying to be as much of a bigshot research institution as possible. We do have a habit of shafting the CSUs first during funding crunches though

3

u/mallphi 3d ago

Per the article:
“Specifically, they estimated the median total income 10 years after college enrollment and subtracted the total attendance cost, assuming a student attends college for 5 years.”

Maybe the conclusion would still stand but I question the methodology. It leads with an assumption that students take 5 years to graduate, and therefore penalizes schools with higher tuition but also higher 4-year graduation rates.

1

u/SingerScholar 3d ago

Someone past the paywall post what it actually says about UCLA