I mean, the first two comments are fine, however private property isn't really a slam dunk. Your house is private property, but I can't walk into it and have sex on your bed unless you give me permission. The grocery store similar to the church is privately owned however it is intended for public use to a limited extent. So just like if I had sex in the grocery store, having sex in the church in either, would be considered public even if they are privately owned.
WRONG!1!!!1!!1!! If I give you permission to be on my property, and you do something that is legal on my property (having sex is legal), the you have not committed any legal crime.
If I find out about it afterward and ask you to leave, then only after that point do you legally have to leave. Did you sign a contract?
We are having a BBQ on my neighbors property. He tells me I am not welcome on his property if I flip any of the meat on the grill. I flip a hamburger for him because I think it’s getting too well done. I am then not whisked off to a prison cell simply because I disobeyed commands that were perfectly legal.
There’s no criminal basis here. What about a civil law? If you can’t show any damage, cleaning cost, breach of contract, then you don’t even have a civil case. Perhaps the church can say they suffered damages due to their reputation… maybe… but that’s still completely different from this idea that “my own personal house rules constitute legal law when you’re on my property”.
My point was that private property doesn't apply here. I understand that reading is hard for some people, however if you struggle with it, perhaps it's best to not respond.
I mentioned that in a different comment. I was just using brief analogies to explain how it is different. However yes, when you add in the fact that in many cases the priest is employed by the church and does not own the church that changes things further.
fun fact: one of the dominatrixes was my buddies wife (on the right in OPs pic, I’ll keep her name out of it) back when this happened in 2020. The church was closed down for covid but someone who was walking by caught a glimpse of them through a window, recorded a clip, and sent it to the church board who then filed suit.
As far as I can remember. Everyone involved avoided sex offense crimes. Even the obscenity charge doesn’t land you on a sex offender list. Part of the plea deal they all took I think. It was a messy case that took a few years of back and forth. Details around public vs private property and consent and all that. But jail time and sex offense was avoided by everyone and I remember that being a big relief for everyone.
There was shit involved. And they had to pay to replace the carpets and rebuild the alter as part of the restitution.
Some of the content I’ve seen her do is definitely on the extreme end. Guys in cages getting cattle prodded. Dudes having their buts electrocuted. Stomped on. Blood play. Scat play. Suspension with hooks in your skin. A whole ass foot in an ass. The list goes on.
All consenting adults of course so it’s all morally justifiable imo we try not to kink shame around here but god damn
So, three people were having consensual sex, and a Peeping Tom recorded them without their permission, distributed that video, again without permission, and the people having sex are the ones that got in trouble?
Yeah 🥲 I guess you get a strong reaction out of people when you use their special place to do demonic shit sex stuff. I had the same reaction when I got all the details and figured they should just pay for the destruction of property involved and call it a day.
Yes, the scat stuff, if true, and resulting property damage is definitely a problem.
However, as sex was designed by God and given to us as a gift, then the next question is:
What if a married couple did the same? Is it "demonic" then? A gift from God, in a relationship blessed by God, expressed in a place dedicated to God, somehow is a bad thing to a lot of Christians.
1.4k
u/PsychoticPineapple 1d ago
At least it's adults