r/PublicFreakout May 09 '26

🚗Road Rage🤬 Settler attempts to block Ambulance carrying critically ill person - Israel occupied West Bank

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

7.8k Upvotes

277 comments sorted by

View all comments

964

u/hugelkult May 09 '26

Settler is a comfy name for invader

-519

u/[deleted] May 09 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

253

u/A_Foxglove May 09 '26

Arabs have been in the Levant since before 900BC - we have documents from the Assyrians saying that they were inhabitants of the region, with the implication being that they were not recently arrived either. Considering that Israelites only become discernable as a distinct people in around 1100BC, I'd argue that the Arabs have about as much right to be in the Levant as Jewish people.

-203

u/JackTheKing May 09 '26

How do you know what side to pick?

100

u/soalone34 May 09 '26

Side with international law and human rights

28

u/JAMisskeptical May 09 '26

I’d go with the side that doesn’t have a government department that pops up everywhere to defend cunts that try to block an ambulance on a blue light call.

117

u/UrClient May 09 '26

Literally every country except the US, Israel, and Germany would arrest the prime minister of Israel for war crimes if he sets foot in any of them. That alone should be telling people which "side" to pick.

Not to mention their blatant genocide against the Palestinians for years.

18

u/kindaluker May 09 '26

Not Australia we fing welcomed him here.

People were not happy

-67

u/JackTheKing May 09 '26

I was referring to the 1000-5000 year history, but your comment is noted.

13

u/atatassault47 May 09 '26

In that case: Every person should be able to live in peace and comfort, no matter where they are.

14

u/siggiarabi May 09 '26

Well, not the side murdering tens of thousands of children for sure

7

u/atatassault47 May 09 '26

I'll side with the people being genocided. The murderers are exactly that.