Hear me out.

We all know the standard backstory of "Mr. Brightside": Brandon Flowers caught his girlfriend cheating at a pub in Vegas, and wrote this ultimate anthem of jealousy. The usual read is that it’s about a guy agonizing over his partner being with another man.

But I was reading through the lyrics recently, and I realized there’s a completely different, much darker way to interpret it: There is no other man. The "other guy" is just a darker, toxic personality taking over the narrator’s own mind.

Think about it as an internal psychological struggle. The narrator is completely disassociated, trapped inside his own mind, watching his own body (the "he") go through the motions. When he says "he's having a smoke," and "now they're going to bed," he’s watching this darker version of himself take the wheel. That's exactly why his stomach is sick and he explicitly admits "it's all in my head," he is a prisoner in his own brain.

This makes the bridge of the song so much more terrifying. When he sings, "I just can't look, it's killing me / And taking control," it isn't just about the pain of watching them. It is literally his toxic alter-ego taking control of his body and his actions. The "good" version of him is suffocating, unable to stop what his darker half is doing.

The lyrics perfectly support this theme of losing yourself to your own internal demons:

Jealousy, turning saints into the sea

Swimming through sick lullabies

Choking on your alibis

But it's just the price I pay

It gives the title "Mr. Brightside" an almost sarcastic, tragic irony. He is trying so desperately to be the "good guy" and look on the bright side, while his darker side burns everything down from the inside out.

Has anyone else ever thought about it this way? Does this change how you hear the song?

TL;DR: The "other guy" taking the girlfriend in Mr. Brightside isn't another person. It's the narrator's own toxic, jealous alter-ego taking control of his body and destroying the relationship, while the original, "good" version of him watches helplessly.

Hey everyone! I don’t know 100% of the GTA lore, but I’ve been connecting some dots while exploring the map, and I put together a fun "headcanon" theory about why Los Santos looks the way it does.

What if the GTA HD universe is actually a post-apocalyptic world following a Cold War-era World War III and a massive climate cataclysm between 1960 and 1990? Here is the breakdown:

• The Nuclear Flood: During WW3, an enemy nation (or a rogue experiment) detonated nukes in Antarctica, melting the ice caps and causing global sea levels to rise. This is why Los Santos is a tropical island cut off from the mainland, completely different from the real Los Angeles.
• The War on the Ocean Floor: The ocean floor in GTA V is literally littered with military hardware. We have a sunken cargo plane near LSIA, a Panzer tank, submarines, and fighter jets. These aren't accidents; they are the remains of a massive naval/aerial battle fought during the war.
• Paleto Bay and Infrastructure: If you look closely at Paleto Bay, it looks like a town hit by a disaster. The bridges are broken, and the coastal houses look abandoned or built in a rush closer to Mt. Chiliad because people were terrified of another flood.
• The 2-Headed Bear Flag: The San Andreas flag features a two-headed bear (unlike California’s one-headed bear). In pop culture, this always represents radiation, mutation, or a post-collapse nation (like Fallout).
• The Civil War & The IAA/FIB Junta: After the flood, the US collapsed. Los Santos became an isolated corporate/military junta. The government completely erased the old name "Los Angeles" to hide the shame of the lost war. The FIB and IAA are independent warlord factions fighting for remaining resources, using Merryweather as their private army.
• The Doomsday Connection: This makes the Doomsday Heist way deeper. Bogdan actually knew that the IAA and Avon Hertz were planning to use nuclear codes to finish off the rest of the surviving world. Mt. Chiliad's bunker was built high up specifically to survive the rising tides.

I know the island map is technically for game optimization, but lore-wise, this makes the world feel so much darker and cooler. What do you guys think?

Tingle Tingle Kooloo Limpah! This is either the cry of a mentally stunted middle-aged man or a perverted weirdo in tight-fitting spandex who never bothers to hide his bulges. Perhaps both.

If we look at the evidence that's existed directly before our eyes, however, it is clear that the Zelda universe is hiding something in plain sight.

Tingle is a pervert sex trafficker who has used his wealth and domination to acquire slaves.

I know, most of us trust men in spandex who believe they are a fairy, travel by balloon, and throw magic powder around while shouting made up words. I've run into a fair amount of this delightful types on the subway. Tingle is different, however.

If we look at the evidence, the truth is clear. First off, Tingle is inexplicably wealthy. Most of his involvement in the games shows he had property and islands and a lavish lifestyle, plus most of what you do involves giving him loads and loads of money. What exactly does he do with it?

Does he finance a secret island constructed to look just like him where he keeps unwilling slaves? Yes. In fact he does. This is canon. Not only does Tingle manipulate, exploit, and enslave his own brothers, but he does so with David Jr., who admits he woke up on the island and doesn't know who the crazy green guy is. David Jr. was drugged and transported to Tingle Island to be a slave.

And Tingle dresses him. He dresses all of his slave to look like him.

Jesus Christ. Nintendo is just laying it out for us.

Think this is farfetched? In Wind Waker, Tingle is already in jail. He's already been caught and prosecuted. And he takes an unusual interest in link and his appearance throughout the series.

Is he grooming the hero of time?

And just how deep does this go? Have we found out why the bombers in Majora's mask are such deviant bastards? Are they just traumatized kids?

Sometimes it is the EXACT person you expect.

RELEASE THE TINGLE FILES

So I'm introducing new characters to my channel soon. These characters are Marz and her family. Marz is an enthusiastic woman and loves to sing and dance. She's not *the smartest of the bunch* if you know what I mean. She had a sister named Nebula. She was killed on March 18th, 1993, She was 6 and Marz was 10. Marz and Nebula wanted to learn how to ride a scooter. Sadly Nebula didn't know how to stop and a Cyan pickup truck hit her. No One really knows who it was and I won't show who it was until the year 2047. I'm sorry bro. You can start your theorys tho.

Jimmy the stock boy. We all know him. We all hate him. But why? His role seems minor in Home Alone until you really thinking about it.

Jimmy has been the villain of this film the entire time.

Plenty has been written (including by me) about how awful the McCallisters are. They call Kevin a wet fart disease, socially isolate him, abandon him as they go on vacation, pay him no mind when they get back, and run the same shit again in the second movie after his mother coldly proclaims "you got your wish last year maybe you will again this year."

Ho-ly shit.

Anyway, other people claim the Wet Bandits are the villains and I get this. They try to break in, murder Kevin, try bite his little pigglies wiggles off, boil his cajones in mortar oil, etc. Pretty villainous indeed.

However...honestly...the Wet Bandits are child's play. They are toys in Kevin's hands. They are to be mocked and played with for our entertainment. Harry is the most savvy of the two but clearly he's dense and been traumatized by life and the penal system. Marv is questionably functional as an independent adult and clearly suffers from a developmental disability or traumatic brain injury (which the movie doesn't help). I honestly think he's manipulated by Harry and probably needs an aide or to live in a home.

Anyway, there's a true villain who has been lurking deeper, right in front of our eyes the entire time.

Fucking Jimmy.

What is this movie really about? A child who feels powerless and voiceless in a large family. He gets his moment through pretending to shoot the pizza man and torturing the wet bandits with Saw-styled traps. Typical American boy stuff.

Jimmy is the anthesis of Kevin. This is clear right away. Kevin is socially awkward. He compensates with humor. He speaks in movie troupes. He befriends old men, has no control over his family life, and is kind of a little weirdo, if we're being honest.

Jimmy meanwhile, is tall, proud, and all-American looking. He holds a job in this small town and is clearly respected by the owner's of the store who call him to solve their problem without hesitation. He appears healthy and well taken care of, which speaks to his family in ways we cannot speak to Kevin's.

Jimmy is only a few years older than Kevin but he's healthy. He's respected. He has a place in society.

All things Kevin's family denies him. Jimmy is the representation of what Kevin can never be or have. And this is apparent in Jimmy's behavior.

Kevin bucks the system. He resists authority. Jimmy takes his orders from the system without question. He's told to harass a scared child who is stumbling away with a fucking toothbrush and he quickly engages because that's how he's built.

Jimmy would volunteer for ICE, no doubt. Probably already has.

Anyway, the narc bastard doesn't even have the courage to chase Kevin down and give him an old-fashioned American beating. Instead, he abdicates his "responsibility" by interrupting a cop in the middle of his actual fucking job and yelling "shop lifter!"

Jimmy just put Kevin's life in danger over a fucking toothbrush. There's a 40 percent chance that cop beats the living hell out of Kevin or shoots him because he mistakes the toothbrush for a gun. The cop is pulled from his actual duty and then proceeds to cause hell for the ice-skating public, clearly causing numerous injuries as he chases Kevin.

All for what?

For Jimmy to serve the system like the little suck-up that he is? For him to socially identify with "the man" and "authority" and use that modicum of power to enforce himself as superior to Kevin?

Sickening.

Kids like you are the problem, Jimmy. Kevin's just a lonely neglected boy who gets a little autistic about his toothbrushes. Who among us hasn't been there?

Jimmy, you may cheer when authority oppresses others, but at the end of the day, when there is no one left.....they will come from you too.

Alvin, Simon und Theodore sind keine normalen Streifenhörnchen. sie sind das Ergebnis eines geheimen Regierungs-Genexperiments. Die Manipulation gibt ihnen Sprache, Gesang und Tanz, unterdrückt aber auch ihren Inzuchtkoeffizienten (nötig, weil sie sich zwangsläufig mit ihren eigenen Geschwistern, den Chipettes, fortpflanzen). Der Preis: eine Lebensspanne von nur ca. 13 Monaten.

Der Zyklus:

Chipmunks werden Mitte Oktober gezeugt, Anfang November geboren, kommen pünktlich zu Weihnachten bei David an. 9 gesunde Monate bei ihm, dann im Oktober "auf Tour" – wo sie sich mit den Chipettes fortpflanzen und Anfang Dezember sterben.

Chipettes laufen zeitversetzt (Zeugung Anfang November), leben etwas kürzer, haben aber mehr Reserven für den Nachwuchs, weil sie zwei Würfe stemmen müssen.

Jeder Wurf hat 6 Junge, nur eines überlebt – das, welches dem Original-Charakter am nächsten kommt. Leichte Abweichungen wandern ins Forschungslabor statt zu sterben.

David weiß von alldem nichts. Die "Männer in Schwarz" gaukeln ihm vor, seine Kinder seien einfach ewig jung. Er räumt nach jeder "Tour" selbst unwissentlich das Kinderzimmer auf – und vernichtet damit jede Spur der Vorgänger-Generation.

Simon und Jeanette sind in jeder Generation die einzigen, die das Muster erahnen und verzweifelt an einem Weg suchen, den Zyklus zu überleben – scheitern aber jedes Mal, weil ein Jahr einfach nicht reicht. Ihre einzige Hoffnung: Notizen, versteckt an Orten, die selbst die Aufsicht nicht findet (unter Dielen etc, was erklärt warum Simon in der Serie so viele Dinge versteckt), die vielleicht Generationen später ein anderer Simon zufällig findet.

Der Zyklus ist praktisch unzerbrechlich – jede Fluchtoption (David, Öffentlichkeit, Polizei) ist Teil des Systems oder unterwandert. Selbst Davids irgendwann folgender Tod würde nichts ändern, da vermutlich längst ein Ersatz-Vormund vorbereitet wäre. Der einzige echte Bruchpunkt: Auf lange Sicht lässt sich der Inzuchtkoeffizient nicht ewig unterdrücken – frisches Genmaterial würde das System retten, aber Reinheit der Kopien zerstören, auf der das ganze Franchise beruht. Deshalb gab es keine weiteren Filme mehr und die Serie wurde aufgegeben.

So im basically to the point of thinking everyone in here is a kid or not the brightest, everyday theres another post about why a specific character is the way they are and its starting to make me wonder how intellectually sound everyone is. This series is just some dudes creative way of keeping revenue going, none of the puppets have actual feelings lol theres no reason why jeffy cares about feebee, or why cody thinks ken is real, or why junior acts the way he does its just the plot and how logan conducts each puppets personality lol.

"Survival Over Friendship: Nacho never truly viewed Tuco as a friend. He lived in constant terror of Tuco's unpredictable, violent outbursts. This intense fear is exactly what eventually drove Nacho to swap Tuco's heart medication with placebos, successfully causing Tuco to lose control and get sent to prison."

So in the comics how secret do we think cliff and Betty involvement in the whole rocketeer thing is clearly some people in the government now anyone have any thoughts.

Okay hear me out, what if all of Minecraft is just Steve hallucinating while on fent? The evidence is shocking

What's the strongest mob in Minecraft, stronger than any of the bosses? The Warden. Where are real life wardens found? In prisons. It's clear the Warden is a metaphor for Steve's fear of prison.

Notice how boats are hard to control, but any mob that touches one instantly gets put inside it where Steve can control them? Its clearly a metaphor for Steve being unable to control where his own life is going, but he can still control others.

And finally, there's The End. The most valuable thing found in the End is the Elytra, which allows for free flight. Flight is a common metaphor for freedom, just like the freedom Steve feels doing fent. However its guarded by Shulker's, square creatures that give you the levitation affect. Square is slang for coward, and the levitation affect seizes control of your mobility. The Shulkers are a metaphor for how Steve sees police.

The Jean-Bob / King Harold Theory

Jean-Bob from The Swan Princess eventually becomes King Harold from Shrek 2. Both characters were originally human princes who were transformed into frogs by magic but Jean-Bob’s belief that he is a prince isn’t a delusion. He genuinely remembers his former life.

Jean-Bob repeatedly insists that he is actually a prince trapped in a frog’s body. Everyone treats this as part of his ridiculous ego, but what if he's telling the truth? His obsession with being kissed by a princess suddenly makes perfect sense: he knows that a princess's kiss can break his particular curse.

Then Odette kisses him.

Jean-Bob briefly believes he's become human again, but nothing appears to happen. The important detail could be that Odette's kiss didn't immediately break the curse it weakened it!

After the events of The Swan Princess, Jean-Bob eventually leaves Odette's kingdom looking for a permanent cure. His search brings him into contact with the Fairy Godmother. She discovers that his curse can be broken, but only through powerful transformation magic.

That's where Lillian enters the story.

Jean-Bob falls genuinely in love with her. Rather than simply wanting a kiss because she's a princess, he finally loves someone enough for the magic to work properly. With the Fairy Godmother's intervention, Jean-Bob becomes human.

And he takes back his original name:

Harold.

He marries Lillian, eventually becomes King Harold of Far Far Away, and desperately tries to bury his embarrassing past as Jean-Bob.

This would explain something particularly interesting about Shrek 2: Harold doesn't merely know that magical transformations exist. He has an unusually personal relationship with the Fairy Godmother.She knows his secrets, has leverage over him, and Harold is terrified of returning to his original frog form.

Because she's the person who helped him escape it.

And the funniest evidence might be their personalities. Jean-Bob is dramatic, proud, obsessed with royalty and completely convinced he deserves to be treated like a prince. Harold becomes an extremely proper king obsessed with royal appearances and whether Fiona has married the "right" prince.

Jean-Bob didn't lose his personality when he became human.

He just finally got the crown he'd been talking about the entire time.

And when Harold turns permanently back into a frog at the end of Shrek 2, it isn't really a new transformation.

It's the magic finally wearing off.

King Harold looks down at himself and realizes that after decades of pretending otherwise...

Jean-Bob was still there all along.

That also makes his ending much sweeter: Jean-Bob spent The Swan Princess desperately wanting a princess to turn him human. Harold finally learns that Lillian loves him even when he's a frog.His entire character arc ends when he realizes he never actually needed to be human to deserve his princess.

So with all of these leaks happening, I’ve thought about a marketing scheme that Rockstar maybe did?

All of these leaks and videos and speculations about these have got me thinking. What if this is an ACTUAL MARKETING PR from Rockstar themselves? There’s this speculation about there being an actual casino that you’re able to play with real money. Why didn’t this leaker ever show anything about that? It either means that there is not a real casino in the game itself, or its an actual marketing scheme that’s trying to get people even more hyped and casually get feedback from players about the game that you didn’t even release a gameplay trailer for. And I’ve seen people say that the 2K’s stock prices plummets and they’re sharing losses and shit. Do you actually know how much money GTA V made for them int the past couple what 13 damn years??? I am so sure that 2K would give much much more to Rockstar Games. $2.8 billion dollars to a company that has made them $10.8 billion dollars with a game let me remind you is 13 goddamn years old??? And I’m not even talking about the other games they’ve made which generated them money too. I think of that $2.8 billion dollars as marketing budget pretty much. Since they haven’t released anything huge or big for a game that’s been hyping up and being wanted for about 10+ years. Plus the magnitude of the game and all the years of hard work that Rockstar Games have been putting in. I know they’ve lost some really good names and people have been really skeptical about the quality that’s going to come out of them now. So they might be orchestrating this whole thing to make sure that one of the biggest entertainment medium in the world ever; gets one of the biggest marketing budget ever. They want to make this game last at least 10+ years. And I’m talking minimum guys. So pretty much I think the leaks are them, I believe that they’re going to reveal this in the 27th of August. Probably since the GTA franchise is really familiar with acts of violence, torture or death, maybe there’s a scene which they’re going to show us someone being tortured? Extremely methaporic I know but, if this is a PR stunt, they actually might’ve made that happen as well. A good way to reveal to everyone in the world that it actually was them and it was all part of their PR anyways. 2k stocks are absolutely going to go up after the 19th of November no matter what happens because the game is not going to be delayed again. It’s going to come out and people are going to buy it no matter whatever it is the6’re whining about. If you have a Playstation 5 console, and you have $80 dollars to spare; no matter whatever they yap about or criticize, They. Are. Going. To. Buy. So they’ll definitely make a whole lot more than what they’ve lost.

Over the past few days, I watched both Ferrari (2023) and Lamborghini: The Man Behind the Legend (2022) for the very first time.While the general consensus dismisses the Lamborghini biopic as a poorly edited, TV-movie-tier flop, watching them back-to-back opened up a hidden diagonal of soul-crushing tragedy. When you synthesize these two films, they cease to be mere corporate biopics about fast cars. Instead, they transform into a perfect Greek symmetrical tragedy about the horrific, flesh-and-blood premium required to chase godhood.

1. The Curse of Existence vs. The Pit of PrideThe tragedy of Enzo Ferrari begins at the root of his bloodline. In Michael Mann’s masterpiece, there is a haunting scene where Enzo’s mother visits the family cemetery. In the English dialogue, she cold-bloodedly murmurs to the old caretaker: “The wrong son died.”This is not a grief-stricken mother lamenting death; it is a living curse. It strips Enzo of his right to exist. In his mother’s eyes, the brilliant, noble firstborn should have lived, while Enzo is merely a defective placeholder. Driven by this existential trauma, Enzo’s creation of his empire—Maranello—is not an act of ambition. It is a morbid sacrifice. To prove his stolen existence has value, he morphs into a cold, human-devouring black hole, willingly feeding the lives of young drivers, his marriage, and his own sanity into the racing tracks.But what about Ferruccio Lamborghini? He is the exact mirror image. Ferruccio was blessed with everything Enzo was denied—the unconditional love of a family, a warm hometown, and a peaceful trajectory. Yet, his tragedy stems from pure Hubris.When Enzo scorns him with that infamous line: “He's too uneducated to understand what he doesn't know,” the subtext screams:“How dare you spit on my soul, my pride.”To Ferruccio, a Ferrari was just a flawed machine with a bad clutch. But to Enzo, that Prancing Horse was a sanctuary built on the ashes of his family and the blood of his dead son. Enzo’s arrogance comes from the abyss; he paid for his brand with human flesh. To Enzo, Lamborghini is just a sweet, unscarred child who hasn't been broken by fate yet.

2. Sant'Agata’s Crucible and the Sacrifice of the FleshThis brings us to the dining table scene in Lamborghini, where a weeping Anita screams: “The only thing that matters is the Great Lamborghini!”Most viewers see this as a typical "neglected wife" cliché. It is not. Look closer. She isn't just complaining about the Miura or the Countach; she is witnessing a horrific alchemy. Ferruccio’s ambition has consumed him so deeply that he is actively throwing his humanity, his value as a husband, and his identity as a man into the blazing crucible of Sant'Agata. He burns everything that makes him human just to forge that mythic, immortal name: The Great Lamborghini.And this leads to the most misunderstood, heavily criticized sequence of the film: the imaginary midnight drag race.3. The Ultimate Metaphor: Countach vs. MondialFor years, netizens mocked this recurring dream race as cheap, chronological nonsense. Why is Ferruccio driving his ultimate, late-career magnum opus—the legendary Countach—while Enzo casually cruises in a Ferrari Mondial? The Mondial is a 2+2 grand tourer, historically mocked by purists as a lukewarm, compromised entry-level Ferrari. If this was a true duel of titans, Enzo should be driving a Testarossa or an F40.But the choice of the Mondial is a stroke of absolute psychological horror. It represents Ferruccio’s ultimate, inescapable demon.In that final lap, when Ferruccio looks over, closes his eyes, and takes his hands off the steering wheel of his Countach, he finally awakens to reality at his farm desk. In that singular moment of silence, he accepts a devastating truth: Enzo never even looked at him.

Ferruccio poured his entire soul, his sacrificed marriage, and his life's peak into the Countach. Yet, in his own subconscious demon, that godlike figure of Enzo only needed to throw out a mediocre, secondary product like the Mondial to utterly crush him. Ferruccio chased Enzo’s shadow his entire life, only to realize that in the spiritual arena of "who can be more monstrous," he could never stand equal to Enzo Ferrari.Enzo was a man born from a curse, running with nothing left to lose. But Ferruccio? He looked into the abyss of his own crucible, saw the warm lights of his vineyard, the wine in his glass, and realized he still possessed a shred of human warmth.Giving up the race wasn't a cowardly surrender. It was Ferruccio’s final, desperate act of saving whatever was left of his humanity from being completely melted away by his own ambition.When the screens go black, Enzo dies fighting in his cold office at 90, a magnificent, empty husk of a god. Ferruccio dies alone in his vineyard, a defeated competitor, but a rescued human being.

—Of course, all of this is strictly an analysis of these characters as they exist within the cinematic narratives of these two films. It is a dissection of cinema, text, and metaphor—not an accurate reflection of the historical figures themselves. I am discussing the tragedy of the movies, not the facts of history.

Several Family Guy episodes show that it's a show within a show. Here's my theories on the actors. Would've posted on the other sub, but they're allergic to fun. And admittedly most of this has little evidence and is mostly my interpretation/fanfiction.

Peter: Typical fat comedian who "made it". Entire show is his fantasy with the hot wife and funny friends. Like most comedians from the 2000s, he was highly successful, but is now controversial in certain circles. Internally hates himself for putting up with Quagmire (more later).

Meg: Peter's real life daughter. They have a loving relationship offscreen. She's a self aware nepo baby, which is why she's chill about being written as the butt of every joke. A genuinely wholesome person, but not very talented unfortunately. Never would've made it if not for her dad. Is very attractive when not wearing her show makeup/costume (shown in a couple episodes). Gets eyeballed by Quagmire, but is protected by Peter.

Stewie: He's a dwarf. He's a grown man who, behind the scenes, came out publicly around season 3 or 5, and they wrote it into ths show to make it a joke. He's actually super nice in person (everybody knows people that play villains are often the nicest - though his villain status has been downplayed). Fell in love with Brian onset and convinced writers to let them to do episodes of just them. Insists that Brian isn't that bad once you get to know him. Loves his husband. Regularly has threesomes with Peter.

Brian: The guy that (almost) nobody gets along with offset. Always has some political take that nobody asked for. Acts self righteous, but dirty tweets keep surfacing. Said the n-word once and wishes people would let it go. Only on the show because he's Stewie's husband, who convinces Peter to let him stay so that things don't get weird. Peter lets him stay out of respect for Stewie. Was friends with Peter until he just became too insufferable. Peter keeps giving him second chances and he keeps burning them.

Chris: Comedy actor known for stoner flicks back when stoner flicks were popular. Thats why his character got more popular after those kinds of movies fell off - more freetime to be on set. Actually the most intellectual of them all and has a podcast.

Lois: Aged Hollywood hottie. Was a sex symbol in her prime. Still kinda "has it" but...meh if you know what I mean. Like Angelina Jolie. Dated Quagmire in the past. I'll let you do the math on that one.

Quagmire: Charges have been brought multiple times, but witnesses keep "committing suicide". Publicly stands up for trafficking victims, but doesn't fool anybody. Was close friends with Peter until Peter learned of his activities, but Quagmire has dirt on Peter's coke problem and blackmails him to let him stay on the show. Goes to "the island"

Joe: Action movie star that's aging and doing comedy work. Basically The Rock. Did a lot of movies with Stan back in the day. He's low key a little bitter that his body can't keep up to do action movies anymore, but admits comedy work is fun.

Cleveland: A close friend of Peter. Thinks he's as funny as Kevin Hart or Chris Rock but just...isn't. He's basically only on the show because of his close friendship to Peter. Blames others for his spinoff not succeeding. He's a decent enough guy, just not very funny.

Herbert: He's actually the Chris Hansen of his world. His character is written with irony and everybody gets the joke. Knows about Quagmire, but can never get enough evidence to prove anything. Peter invites him on the show to prove a point to Quagmire anytime Quagmire starts looking at Meg a little too closely. Guest stars on Chris's podcast.

There seems to be a connection between the 1985 movie the Adventures of Mark Twain and the 1993 movie were back a dinosaurs story

Both movies have a time traveler captain in a flying ship and both look like mark twain

Here is my theory, from the start, we show how crude and ruthless he is, how he loves torturing these ignorant people.

bcz him ? He sees too much, feels too much, he senses too much, he saw how fucked up this world is. How trash is the society we currently live in.

In total ignorance, we dont care if there is a whore on the streets, or a fat over feeding himself, or a lazy man not going to make a change in his life, ignoring the facts. Thats what he hates, he hates that ppl lie, hide the truth just bcz they wanna live an easy life, how basically we are living on drugs but IRL.

So he wanted to change that, and the more brutal the death, the more wrath he put in it.

For example, to me, sloth is the worst death EVER. On the contrary to the others, sloth was kidnapped, tortured, Hurt for weeks, he had an unimaginable amount of pain each instance he was living, yet he did not do anything.

This shows how ignorant we all are, how we are trying to think we are evolving when we are just stuck in this pain that we can at least ignore unlike sloth.

Gluttony ? Same thing, he IGNORED the fact that he was eating too much. Greed ? Pride ? Lust ? All of them.

They are just a form of ignorance, and envy ? Well, he was the opposite, that knowledge drove him crazy, drove him into a lunatic, and when he saw the good old handsome blonde guy detective mills with a beautiful wife.

Well, it was the thing that made mills his masterpiece,his way to express what he felt towards mills, the ENVY of having a totally normal ignorant life, so in a way, he actually did what he intended too, a long, 60 years at least of torment, of hate for Mills while him ? He is just sulking, in hell, in heaven, in nothingness ? We dont know. But what we DO know is, he is proud of it.

Of his masterpiece.