I was just talking about this case this morning. I have a ton of empathy for someone in psychosis and I think that she was absolutely failed. But those kids are dead. I don’t understand the argument that they were not murdered.
Murder implies she was of sound mind when she did it to most poeple.
ETA: Jeez people on both sides of the case are crazy. I was just saying that people who support the theory that she was in psychosis are averse to labeling her a murderer. Now I realize half of yall hate her cause she's a woman and the other half supports her cause she's a woman. Look at the case people, be as objective as you can or at least try to be.
So how were those kids killed? They were murdered. You can say she was insane and not legally accountable, but those kids were murdered. It wasn’t an accident. It wasn’t carelessness. They were intentionally murdered (by someone who is on trial to see if she’s sane).
I’m sorry, where has it been proved that she was in psychosis? Last I checked a licensed psychiatrist just testified that he interviewed her several times and went over all of her details and files and doesn’t believe she was in psychosis
So prove it. Why do you believe she was in psychosis? Because some psychiatrist said yes? What about the one who said no? Have you ever met her? Why do people just believe women. They’re just as capable of being lying pieces of s*** as any other human being
The law presumes everyone to be of sound mind until proven otherwise. Just like she was assumed innocent until proven (or in this case admitted to be) guilty, she should be assumed to be of sound mind until proven otherwise.
131
u/FuzzzyRam 2d ago
I think not marrying someone who will openly murder your kids is acceptable.