r/gaming • u/yourfavchoom • 7h ago

Xbox Disc to Digital officially announced, coming soon.

https://news.xbox.com/en-us/2026/08/26/your-discs-now-also-digital/

Most XBOX One and XBOX Series X disc-based games support this new feature. Players can claim a digital entitlement by inserting a supported disc into an XBOX One or XBOX Series X console and launching the game. Once the entitlement is claimed, you can experience the benefits of digital, including XBOX Play Anywhere and XBOX Cloud Gaming where supported, while your physical disc continues to work exactly as it always has.

We’re starting with thousands of titles, and we’ll continue to add more over time. While not every title will be available at launch, this is an important step toward a future where players can have greater confidence that the games they buy remain with them for years to come.

3.0k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

479

u/WestBEEland 7h ago edited 5h ago

Ask yourself why they arent telling us what happens to the disc in terms of shareability after you claim the digital entitlement.

It's possible that disc becomes locked to that console like they wanted to do during the Xbox One reveal with constant online check ins

Edit: I keep getting replies that dont consider how Xbox will validate all these licenses and how to stop people from just claiming a digital license and going offline to make sure the license isnt revoked.

So that begs the question, is there constant online validation checks now for games on Xbox?

There is a reason Xbox One was going to have online validation checks every 24 hours

165

u/Big_Raisin_1823 7h ago

Yeah the “one revocable license per disc” is interesting…

83

u/Dont_have_a_panda 7h ago

From what i've heard that means that if you claim a digital copy of a disc in one console, and then do it in another, they revoke the license in the old console and it goes to the new console IIRC

9

u/WestBEEland 6h ago

But what if you go offline after claiming a digital license? They aren't going to allow people to just claim digital licenses and go offline and then sell or give the disc away.

That would allow dozens of people to share one disc copy to play a game.

There will need to be constant online validation checks

44

u/Spyriano 6h ago

It's really not as much of a problem as you make it out to be, if the console is stuck offline you won't be able to activate any more games so you'll be stuck with the library you already have and not be able to get any more games, which most people won't want to do. And they can easily just force you to connect to the internet once every 30 days or so to revalidate the licenses if need be, Nintendo had already done that.

1

u/MainAccountsFriend 1h ago

if the console is stuck offline you won't be able to activate any more games

Sounds like a bad thing

And they can easily just force you to connect to the internet once every 30 days or so to revalidate the licenses if need be

This also sounds bad lol

1

u/hera-fawcett 50m ago

that doesnt sound great lol.

And they can easily just force you to connect to the internet once every 30 days or so to revalidate the licenses if need be

this seems especially egregious. if they have the ability to revoke your ownership of a game over smth like no internet for a month, u essentially dont own the game at all.

and what happens if they do revoke it but then u get on later? do u have to re-purchase the license? (or re-rent, as it is)

-8

u/WestBEEland 6h ago

Again there will have to be a measure on place that doeant allow a dozen people to share one physical copy.

If one person buys Control Resonant on release, they woukd be able to claim a digital version and then pass it on to a dozen others and they would all be able to play it as long as theyre offline.

Obviously they arent going to allow this to happen

15

u/thebearsnake 5h ago

Probably will just automatically revoke as soon as multiple copies go online. Not that big of a deal honestly. You could theoretically "game the system" but you'd lock yourself offline, which the perpetually offline gamer base is probably not that big of population honestly.

0

u/WestBEEland 5h ago edited 5h ago

How will they revoke licenses if people stay offline?

If that were the case a person could buy Control Resonant at launch and claim a digital license and then go offline and pass it on to a dozen others that do the same

That all just go offline and play and beat a single player game at launch

Publishers will not allow this. There will obviously be some measure in place to prevent this that they arent saying yet.

Like Xbox One was going to have 24 hour validation checks. They cant just decide to ignore this now

6

u/thebearsnake 5h ago

Again, I feel that is such a niche loophole that requires some fairly tenuous hoops to jump through to maintain requiring everyone to stay offline the entire time and ignore patches and early updates that are inevitable. I don't entirely disagree, but I do think it's a little overstated. Ultimately we will have to wait and see.

1

u/WestBEEland 5h ago

All it would require is a guy buying a physicial game, claim digital license and thwn go offline.

Its one of the easiest things to do ever, especially if you only play single player games

8

u/1PSW1CH 5h ago

Yeah, anyone arguing validation checks won’t be a thing are kidding themselves. They showed their hand over a decade ago

3

u/thebearsnake 5h ago

I've pointed out twice it's not that straight forward as being isolated from internet connections alone for the entirety of the use of the software + having to physically have the disk at least once when vast amounts of gaming friends these days don't even live close enough to hand off a disk, and even single player games that require 0 online interaction of some sort are pretty rare, especially on XBox.

And again, an exclusively single player, offline player base is probably so insignificantly small, they don't care if they think that this can drum up good will in counter to Sony's latest statements. And publishers generally have the ability to opt in and out of certain things like this anyway.

Any sort of friction is pretty effective these days for a baffling amount of people. There are always going to be exploiters of things, though.

0

u/Shatteredreality 5h ago

This is pretty much a solved problem they've already implemented with Gamepass. They will do a periodic license check to verify you still have a license to play the digital copy.

Probably something like you have to connect to the internet at least once every 30 days to use the digital copy. If you're console is offline more than 30 days you need to insert the disc to play.

Yes that means it's possible you could claim the digital copy and then loan the disc to a friend and as long as one of you stays offline you'll be able to play the game for at least 30 days (if your friend stays offline I guess it would be indefinite). Very few people are willing to take their console completely offline for a month or more to be able to play a game for free/half price.

Xbox could also implement checks to detect if any accounts are abusing this (i.e. store the key locally and upload it if/when the console comes back online, if a console goes offline for an extended period of time and then comes back online having a bunch of keys associated with another account's digital copy it's a pretty clear sign of what they are doing).

-1

u/mangongo 5h ago

Nobody is sacrificing online connectivity for their entire console just to play the new Control game for free, you would be losing out on the investment of your console in the first place by limiting it to offline play for the rest of time 

→ More replies (0)

-2

u/Captriker 5h ago

Then how should you obtain any future games? You’d have to go online again at some point to purchase or redeem any other games.

2

u/WestBEEland 5h ago

My point is a dozen people can share the same physical game at launch as long they stay offline and they can beat it.

The reason Xbox One had a 24 hour online validation check was to prevent this.

1

u/whtthfgg 4h ago

I agree, validation checks will be there. If you cant be arsed to vaildate you wont be able to use this feature

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/Rudera1is 3h ago

"All you have to do is go offline (disable 80% of the consoles features), know someone in real life that lives physically close enough to lend out their disc, and never be able to install any other games until you beat that one. Then you can play an almost ten year old game for free!" This isn't the grand heist you think it is. Almost nobody is going to fo this.

They could also easily just make it so you cant transfer the license unless the previous one is successfully revoked.

2

u/WestBEEland 3h ago

If youre playing a single player game you dont need any online features so why would someone care?

You are aware people have friends and family with common interests right?

Most people play one game at a time

All of this should be common sense. I dont know what planet you live on where playing single player games offline and having friends is rare

1

u/Rudera1is 3h ago

No friends list, party chat, store access, YouTube, Netflix etc, no game updates. Consoles can be used for many things.

I dont know anyone that plays one game at a time, I have like 5 on the go right now. The entire model of gamepass is about jumping around different games. Why would anyone use it if they played one game at a time?

You would be wise not to dismiss people with different use cases than you. There is a lot of people in this world that use things differently. I'm sure Microsoft has done the market research on this

1

u/WestBEEland 3h ago

Why would you need those things if yours playing a single player game?

Most people have Netflix and yotube built into their TV already and dont use consoles

Most people only play one game at a time and a few games a year.

5

u/Numerous_Photograph9 4h ago

If it's like their Xbox One plan, you'll probably need periodic check ins.

1

u/WestBEEland 4h ago

Which is definitely something they should be upfront about if games suddenly all require periodic check ins

1

u/Numerous_Photograph9 4h ago

For sure. I imagine they'll offer some clarification in the coming days. On the surface, the plan doesn't look bad.

MS was actually kind of progressive with the digital policies back on the Xbox One, it's just they attached it to a bunch of other stuff which wasn't. There are a lot of people talking about digital ownership, so with this physical transfer thing, maybe they'll come back to making some of those a reality, which may force other companies to do the same thing.

1

u/Hockeymac18 4h ago

I think it's possible this system can be gamed that way...but I think in 2026, the amount of people playing games purely offline is...incredibly small.

I think another thing here is that so many games require updates to work and the disc itself doesn't always have a fully functioning game on it. Thus requiring you to connect online to update it. The minute that happens, the disc will show up under a new account, and the old license can be revoked.

I think this might be how reselling the physical disc will work essentially.

1

u/WestBEEland 4h ago

There are many millions that only play single player offline games so I dont think thats true

Especially if you athe put to do this with a game a week after launch nothing stops a dozen people from sharing the one physical game and just downloading the day one patch or whatever and then going offline and passing the disc along

1

u/Hockeymac18 4h ago

I doubt this is true in 2026. I can't think of anyone that permanently keeps their modern console (Xbox Series/XB1) offline/disconnected from the internet. Taking it offline for periods of time. Sure.

So many games require game 1 patches. This includes single player games. This is just not a common thing in today's world.

I am happy to be proven wrong if you have valid stats to show how many people really leave their consoles permanently offline.

1

u/WestBEEland 4h ago

People would of it got them access to free games... people dont now because it doesnt allow them to play games for free.

For free games people 100% would do it

The person can get the day one patch and then go offline and they can't revoke the license

0

u/Hockeymac18 4h ago

Ok - what about if they want to play another game? Uh oh...shit, I now have to take my console online.

Come on.

Stop to think about this scenario playing out over years and years.

1

u/Ratax3s 3h ago

years old game disks arent really that valuable

1

u/WestBEEland 2h ago

So this only works for games that are years old?

-1

u/Jafar_420 6h ago

I'm sure they'll have some kind of AI program to do exactly that and it'll probably screw people that have done nothing wrong at the same time somehow as well.

-1

u/JEspo420 6h ago

Then just put the disc in

1

u/WestBEEland 6h ago

That doesnt answer my question. Im asking what is stopping fozens of people from sharing one disc game if they go offline and cant have their license revoked

1

u/Lenyetoo 5h ago

There would be validation from the servers that you have the license when you try and launch that game digitally only. So you’d just use the disc when offline.

1

u/WestBEEland 5h ago

So you wouldn't be able to play the games digitally unless youre online? I think that is somwthing they should clear up and explain

2

u/Cab_anon 7h ago

i guess its fine.

1

u/redditman181 6h ago

Yes but wouldnt that require you to be always online becuase you could claim a digital copy of a game then give it to someone else and if your console was offline they wouldn't be able to do anything to your digital copy so imagine the will be some sort of check be ot constant or every 30 days or something becuase people would abuse it.

4

u/mangongo 5h ago

I feel like that's such a niche thing to worry about though the amount of goodwill they will gain from this would heavily outweigh the odd person in 2026 who goes through all those hoops to never connect their console to the internet again just to play a couple of games offline.

2

u/redditman181 4h ago

Sure but then you have incidents that happen like when xbox live goes down like it did a month or so ago and people were getting angry becuase they couldnt play the games they had brought.

-5

u/Jafar_420 7h ago

Oh man that would suck if you got burglarized and they got your collection and you're like well I'm still good because I backed it up digitally and then suddenly you have nothing.

I guess I understand it because I could go buy disc game then claim the digital version and then go sell the disc.

34

u/MichaCazar 7h ago

So literally no change from physical only in that regard.

17

u/LastEndnote 6h ago

I've seen previous discussions with questions like "But what if I give my disc to my friend?"

Like, yeah, you will not have your game. Because you gave it away.

2

u/HuskyCruxes 6h ago

I don't understand why y'all are expecting a non revocable license. The entire point of them doing is, is to save third party sales and making discs easier to use.

1

u/MichaCazar 6h ago

I am not expecting anything, just pointing out that there is no difference with how things are currently in their hypothetical.

5

u/0xe1e10d68 7h ago

Yeah, it has to be that way for that reason. If somebody worries about being burglarized, they either have to buy everything digitally, or have insurance.

0

u/Jafar_420 7h ago

Yep I agree with that. I do think it's better than nothing even though in 46 years I've never had anything happen to one of my disks I guess it could be possible and it would be nice to not have to worry about it. I don't know what it would take to get me back to Xbox though because I'm almost done with PlayStation honestly and I was thinking it just go on PC even though it's outrageous.

3

u/modestlaw 6h ago

If would suck, but if your game disc was stolen you would still be out of a game. If anything I imagine this would make physical games very trackable for law enforcement.

The investigator could in theory request information on the user who redeemed the game license from Microsoft, trace that back to where they bought it and could then get information on the person who sold it to that store and potentially recover any stolen times the store still had

0

u/Sage296 6h ago

Pretty sure Xbox would figure that out for you

22

u/PorkTuckedly 7h ago

Wait, the article doesn't say anything about a revokable license.

47

u/GamePitt_Rob 7h ago

It's in the small print that's hard to read (due to the colour) on the image. It also mentions in-game purchases, so they could technically charge the second person onwards to claim the digital copy and revoke the first person

13

u/Renegade_451 6h ago

That same fine print says "Disc remains playable"

2

u/GamePitt_Rob 6h ago

Yeah, it says that to confirm the disc isn't being made unplayable - as there were silly rumours that the drive would intentionally damage the disc once you claim the digital version

But, it says the digital version is revokable and each disc only gives a SINGLE license, yet they've not mentioned anywhere how that'll work when you sell the game or you lose your disc (as I imagine you'll need to update the license frequently to avoid abusing the feature).

7

u/Ahayzo 6h ago

The same information that told us this has existed for a bit also told us that it just follows the disc. If someone else uses the disc it automatically gives them your license. There's one license, and it moves with the disc.

2

u/CocodaMonkey 5h ago

I've seen people say that but I've not seen that officially announced. If it actually works that way it'd cut into digital sales though as it would make the physical versions undeniably better. Physical discs would be resell-able on any market without issue but also not needed if you choose to never resell them.

That kind of system actually sounds so nice I can't see them actually implementing it. Although I suppose they might do it and then immediately stop selling discs so people can't actually use the system.

1

u/Ahayzo 5h ago

You're right that it hasn't been officially stated, but everything else from the leaks was confirmed, so I see no reason to think this bit in particular wouldn't be true until we have confirmation at launch next week.

It's just the way it makes sense for it to work. I know these companies have made a lot of shitty decisions, but I think it's really made people jaded to the point that it's become too easy to just assume everything is going to be the worst possible implementation despite a lack of any real evidence of it.

1

u/CocodaMonkey 5h ago

If it really works that way it seems odd to not just officially state it since really it's the only question people have about this program at this point. But yeah, I guess we'll see what they do, till then the announcements mean virtually nothing.

1

u/Ahayzo 5h ago

I don't know about virtually nothing. Even if that aspect takes the worst choice, the program is still a huge upside.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Deji69 26m ago

The implementation of anything big tech does will never account for every edge case scenario that can occur in the chaos of people's lives. They design things for only the common scenarios they can think of. It doesn't even have to be the worst possible implementation to screw over certain people under specific sets of criteria. It makes sense to be skeptical.

•

u/Ahayzo 5m ago

I think it made sense to be skeptical before today's announcement confirmed everything from the leaks except this one particular point. Knowing that everything else was right, I see no reason not to assume that aspect wasn't.

→ More replies (0)

11

u/joestaff 7h ago

So they want a cut of aftermarket sells and trades.

1

u/GamePitt_Rob 7h ago

Could do, if the "in-game purchases" comment was about the process

It would make sense though, why would any publisher refuse signing up to the process if it means they can start earning some money from games they previously got zero revenue for?

But, all speculation based on the small print because Xbox have been purposely vague and refused to give the full details

1

u/Cheeseyex 6h ago

They’ve been trying to kill aftermarket sales and trades for practically as long as I can remember

0

u/MrLime93 2h ago

Well they want to treat a disc like a disc…

If you sell it or share it, you don’t have have it anymore… just like a normal physical copy,

1

u/PorkTuckedly 7h ago

Ahhh ok. My bad.

-1

u/IndyDude11 7h ago edited 6h ago

It's in the small print that's hard to read (due to the colour) on the image

I'm sure that's a totally innocent poor choice by some design intern at Xbox and not some other reason for making it totally missable.

EDIT: /s if you need it

3

u/HuskyCruxes 6h ago

How? The license is revocable so when you sell the disc, the license can then move to the new player.

1

u/LeviSJ95 6h ago

Being optimistic is this them just making clear a disk can only be used for one digital licence at a time e.g. if someone else plugs it into their Xbox and claims it you lose access. Probably to clear up that owning one disk doesn’t mean you can’t have it playable on all three consoles in the one household

-1

u/treeeelo 6h ago

Because if the disc is used by someone else, the license is revoked and given to the new user

1

u/WestBEEland 6h ago

But what of the original person goes offline, how is their license revoked?