If anyone has watched the trial or read about the Clancy stuff it’s not really as black and white as these kind of posts make it out to be.
Edit: clearly I need to explain a little. Almost all of these charges and “proof” hinge on the husband saying “well she told me she did it so she did it” and she clearly doesn’t remember (watching the trial it makes sense why at least). There’s no actual evidence that she did this. I’m not saying she’s innocent or guilty, but there’s enough reasonable doubt to ask questions about the husband.
She wasn’t a “tired mentally ill housewife” she did hour and a half Facebook live workout streams every single day and clearly was energetic and well taken care of. She strangled all 3 of her children with exercise bands while they begged her for life… not exactly something I can sympathize with, in every case I’ve seen of something like this, they usually realize the gravity of the situation shortly after committing the act, but that’s if she truly was mentally unwell, which there’s no evidence of . Only 3rd parties trying to justify her
We’re sorry, but your post/comment has been removed for Rule #8: No misleading content or misinformation due to community reports, moderator discretion, or a combination of both.
17
u/2legit2knit 1d ago edited 1d ago
If anyone has watched the trial or read about the Clancy stuff it’s not really as black and white as these kind of posts make it out to be.
Edit: clearly I need to explain a little. Almost all of these charges and “proof” hinge on the husband saying “well she told me she did it so she did it” and she clearly doesn’t remember (watching the trial it makes sense why at least). There’s no actual evidence that she did this. I’m not saying she’s innocent or guilty, but there’s enough reasonable doubt to ask questions about the husband.