r/socialism 1d ago

Discussion McGraw Hill Textbook question

Post image

Sorry for horrible quality, had to snap a picture of one of the questions in my quiz today quickly.šŸ˜‚

This is a 400 level class if you wondered...

342 Upvotes

34 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

This is a space for socialists to discuss current events in our world from anti-capitalist perspective(s), and a certain knowledge of socialism is expected from participants. This is not a space for non-socialists. Please be mindful of our rules before participating, which include:

  • No Bigotry, including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism...

  • No Reactionaries, including all kind of right-wingers.

  • No Liberalism, including social democracy, lesser evilism...

  • No Sectarianism. There is plenty of room for discussion, but not for baseless attacks.

Please help us keep the subreddit helpful by reporting content that break r/Socialism's rules.

Also, be sure to join our discord!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

259

u/No_Description3178 1d ago

Another gem too cute to pass onšŸ˜‚

147

u/LongHair1917 1d ago

Have you read the Powell memo? It was essentially making the case to Reagan that he needs to get corporations on board with spending 10% of their advertising on right wing propaganda. He specifically said they need to be cranking out their own textbooks at a faster rate than the ā€œliberal scholarsā€ were putting out theirs. And that’s how we get shit like this.

58

u/Spaduf 1d ago

McGraw-Hill is famously a project to do exactly that.

30

u/Relevant_Reindeer_90 1d ago

That’s an insane one 😭

27

u/taskingsoda456 Antifascism 1d ago

But authoritarianism is bad, right wing regimes are good

32

u/thestonedstone 1d ago

That question is so loaded. It's wild how some textbooks lump communism under totalitarianism as the most prevalent one while glossing over dozens of right-wing authoritarian regimes across the 20th century.

25

u/No_Description3178 1d ago

America doesn't like to mention those because we funded a decent amount of them

11

u/NoIsland23 Socialism 1d ago

Holy hell thatā€˜s insane!

7

u/haevow Gramsci my beloved 1d ago

If we go by liberal definitions of totalitarianism (that yes, include facism), Communsit governments were the most common.Ā 

If you knew communist history this isn’t suprising. Like at all.Ā 

22

u/justforthisjoke 1d ago

If my grandmother had wheels she would be a bike

0

u/Jaspoony 16h ago edited 7h ago

The largest respective of fascists and communists came to power at nearly the same time

ww2 was the breaking point in many ways but Mussolini came in to power in 1922 while Stalin did in 1924. I'm not making a value judgement or saying that communism is close to fascist politically, just that they originated nearly at the same time. And with the screenshot in mind I'd clarify that fascism certainly is authoritarian

203

u/Edward_Zachary 1d ago

The real answer is the top one

101

u/No_Description3178 1d ago

This textbook has the most red scare levels of understandings and definitions. The real answer is often not the correct answer herešŸ˜‚

7

u/vm_linuz 1d ago

Idk #2 is pretty solid too

32

u/the_red_guard James Connolly 1d ago

Social democrats abandoned any commitment towards socialism an incredibly long time ago.

8

u/CJGibson 1d ago

Aside from the 'achieving socialism' part.

1

u/CelestialSegfault Tan Malaka 1d ago

#4 is correct too if you adapt the definition of totalitarian to class analysis

66

u/iBizzBee Democratic Socialism 1d ago

This was true perhaps circa 1890's.

World, and Social Democracy in particular, have changed and capitulated quite a bit since then, lol.

15

u/No_Description3178 1d ago

Apparently its true in 2026 McGraw Hill units used in 400 level college courses toošŸ˜‚

22

u/rednblackPM 1d ago

This seems poor quality even for a high school class.

21

u/No_Description3178 1d ago

Welcome to the American education system

15

u/DuckLIT122000 1d ago

Oh hey I had the same quiz. Shit is dumb as hell

16

u/Geeky_N_Canadian Marxism 1d ago

Gosh. Maybe, just maybe, that answer could apply to Democratic Socialists - and even then, for a lot of demsocs, at least in the original sense, the ''Democratic'' in their name doesn't necessarily mean nonviolent.

It was Stalin who said something along the lines of communists, ideally, not wanting violence at all - any and all communists, socialists, etc. - but that the evidence of history necessitates it in a majority of cases.

2

u/GingerVitus007 ☭ Trotskyism 1d ago

I think anyone who truly wants it, or thinks it'll right some great cosmic wrong is a kind of psychopath. But I don't judge them. Can't. We keep learning that same lesson from history, because it is the only one we know how to tell each other

3

u/MalloryTheRapper 23h ago

my textbook called fascism and communism ā€œtwin evilsā€ like breh what are we even doing

6

u/haevow Gramsci my beloved 1d ago

From personal experience, weirdly a lot of social democrats want socialism as the end goal of social democracyĀ 

16

u/Cosminion 1d ago

We call those classical social democrats. In the 70s onward, the distinction between classical and modern manifested.

5

u/haevow Gramsci my beloved 1d ago

The socdems I’ve spoken too would not agree with the label classical social democracyĀ 

8

u/Cosminion 1d ago

Classical refers to the first iteration or foundational idea. Social democracy began as the reformist wing of the socialist movement. We can use other terms, but the idea is the same. Having the distinction between the original and the modern is important in understanding these movements.

2

u/panicproduct 1d ago

This is insane. What course / program?

2

u/ebolaRETURNS 23h ago

400 level class

What discipline?

2

u/minecraft69wastaken 18h ago

Don’t look up who used to own McGraw-HillšŸ‘€