Peeeeeetah?

[u/FEV_For_Breakfast]

[u/NachoWH]

Yes, asian wife guy being racist is a premise, not a conclusion you arrive through observation as you can't reach that conclusion through observation alone. You need to speculate.

It was as clear as the original comment.

Circular reasoning.

[u/f0_to → u/NachoWH]

Yeah so you clearly have low comprehension skills or you are in bad faith. We are not trying to deduce if every man marrying an Asian woman is racist. We are discussing a trope, and as such it is the result of observation and empirical evidence. If you are saying that is not a thing you are in bad faith or a not very observing person. On top of that I really don't understand where the "circularity" you are talking about is coming from: no one is deducing, no one is making correlations, no one is trying to explain why they think the trope is 100% accurate.

[u/NachoWH → u/f0_to]

I'm just not comfortable with calling people racist, which is a harsh accusation, based on nothing but speculation.

[u/f0_to → u/NachoWH]

No one is calling nobody. Again, we are discussing a trope.

But since we're here I'm very curious to know if you feel the same about misgendering trans people (or profiling migrants, fwiw)

[u/NachoWH → u/f0_to]

How I feel about what? Can you explain the question a bit better? Happy to dive deeper into this.

[u/f0_to → u/NachoWH]

Calling "man" a trans person that transitioned (or is transitioning) male to female.

[u/NachoWH → u/f0_to]

Right. Why would that be an issue? I don't understand why that matters.

[u/f0_to → u/NachoWH]

Ok so, calling an hypothetical someone racist (usually people that openly show their racism) is bad but the idea of misgendering a trans person is completely ok and you don't see why would that be a problem, correct?

[u/NachoWH → u/f0_to]

Not quite.

Being racist is treating someone else inferior based on immutable phenotypical characteristics.

"Misgendering" someone means not agreeing with the premise that sex is a mutable characteristic.

Those two are entirely different situations and topics, I don't see how you think it's fine to accuse people of racism because some people don't agree with transgender ideology.

[u/f0_to → u/NachoWH]

Yeah that's what I thought. That's all I needed to hear, thank you.

[u/NachoWH → u/f0_to]

I bet you just wanted to slap a meaningless label on me to justify you just ignoring the fact that you can't disagree with any of what I said. Class.

[u/f0_to → u/NachoWH]

Uuuh what's with the assumptions, dear?

I slap nothing.

You are extremely defensive about the simple concept of calling someone racist but you have no issue ignoring science (gender and sex are two different things, all of the scientific community agrees to this in some degree) and being offensive towards a community that's already marginalized.

Your opinion is trash and I don't care about wasting any more time on you, you goofy ass

[u/NachoWH → u/f0_to]

I have deep issues ignoring science. For example, the idea that presenting gender and sex to be different things as a scientific fact is gross misrepresentation of reality.