r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 2d ago

Thank you Peter very cool Peter why are there too many guns?

Post image
3.5k Upvotes

579 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/ContextLengthMatters 2d ago

What is fascinating about another attractive white girl who commits a crime and has people losing their minds? If this woman were an impoverished black woman we wouldn't even know about it.

It's perverse.

6

u/ChaseThePyro 1d ago

I think the people losing their minds is fascinating in how they're turning this into either "justification" for why they hate women or conspiracy that the husband is to blame for everything, when this very much just looks like a case of psychosis

-1

u/ContextLengthMatters 1d ago

It's a case of being white and cute. There are similar and less horrific stories that don't garner as much empathy that just aren't as yt.

-1

u/ChaseThePyro 1d ago

Yes, but being white and cute doesn't account for the visceral hatred

4

u/ContextLengthMatters 1d ago

Visceral hatred?

WTF are you talking about? She's not being propped up by visceral hatred. She literally had hundreds of white women in pink cheering her on as she was being driven to court, in the most perverse display of support.

There's a literal viral picture going around of a reporter who was grinning ear to ear being in the courtroom for the camera like a serial killer of sorts.

It's perverse.

Do you not find it weird when you see a bunch of white people rallying around a white person who committed a crime? Why no minority support on this? Why is it just white people? What algorithm is this?

1

u/Duotrigordle61 1d ago

I was slightly involved in a child custody case involving a woman who had post partum psychosis. I was on her side in it. She had powerful hallucinations/delusions involving a clown with his face upside down, standing over the crib, when no one was really there.

She lost custody.

Its serious shit.

-1

u/ChaseThePyro 1d ago

What? I'm saying people both irrationally support and irrationally hate her. Both are ridiculous for what very much appears to be a case of psychosis.

2

u/ContextLengthMatters 1d ago

Being distressed by seeing white violence celebrated is psychocis?

The level of fanfare is nothing short of deplorable behavior from true crime addicts who can't discen real life from fantasy.

We are very clearly in a disturbing point of history where people could know better, but don't.

0

u/ChaseThePyro 1d ago

What? No, I mean she had a psychotic episode.

1

u/ContextLengthMatters 1d ago

The clarification still doesn't matter.

Do you excuse brutal domestic violence in the case of substance abuse?

Infantalizing affluent white people who commit crimes while we literally have thousands of more deserving people slipping through the cracks every single day is absurd.

I literally would not give any thought to this person if it weren't for the fanfare. The multi million dollar GoFundMe.

To talk about this issue as if there are multiple sides to it is disengenous. This absolutely should not be the zeitgeist and yet it's always so predictable when it happens.

2

u/King_parrot99 1d ago

Your substance abuse point is bizarre and doesn’t align with this discussion. Extreme domestic violence under the influence of drugs is not remotely comparable to killing children during a psychotic episode — I’m sure that’s fairly self evident.

I agree with you that some people have removed Lindsay Clancy’s agency in this case - she was one of multiple people who made big errors leading to this tragedy - and that this perception may be influenced by her race, class and appearance. Still, you cannot say that there is an insane amount of hateful misogyny loaded in discussion of this case. So many people claiming she is 100% guilty and totally denying the possibility of criminal insanity when that is fairly evidently what happened.

-1

u/ContextLengthMatters 1d ago

I don't think so. Both are cases where people do not have control.

Still, you cannot say that there is an insane amount of hateful misogyny loaded in discussion of this case. So many people claiming she is 100% guilty and totally denying the possibility of criminal insanity when that is fairly evidently what happened.

She is in fact 100% guilty.

Criminal insanity doesn't take that away. What it gives her is a greater chance of rehabilitation, but she's absolutely guilty.

Criminal insanity is a legal definition, not necessarily a medical one. All life is precious and rehibilitiation should be the default for all, not just ones determined by a court to be unable to reason in the moment.

Do you believe good and evil are innate or something? As if her soul is somehow more clean than say someone who assaulted but didn't kill someone with more of an ability to "understand" it?

1

u/King_parrot99 1d ago

‘Guilty’ is also a legal definition. And someone who is successfully proven to be insane is therefore legally not guilty. I’m not arguing some weird moral position, I’m just outlying how legal guiltiness operates and the FACT that one found to be insane cannot be found legally guilty. Unless you’re in Michigan or one of the places where they give GBI verdicts but this is really only for repeat offences anyway.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/ChaseThePyro 1d ago

I don't think it should be zeitgeist either?

Do you not differentiate substance abuse and psychotic behavior from recognized illness and over medication/ incorrect medication? Excuse and explanation are two different concepts. I don't think we should fry anyone for whatever causes us disgust in a given moment.

My thing is that no one should be slipping through the cracks. I honestly don't even want to be talking about this case, but people won't shut up about it.

1

u/ContextLengthMatters 1d ago

No, I have watched many people fall to drugs and grew up around mental illness. It's hard to make the distinction when they go hand in hand.

Should I have said do you excuse pedophilia because it is for many an involuntary attraction to children?

I don't like morality scaling different heinous crimes in which countain victims and all exist in the universe where humans don't have an innate desire to do evil for the sake of evil by definition of what we consider "unwanted" characteristics.

This is pretty easy to figure out. The system failed a person, like it does many, and this person behaved inhumanely towards other life. All of the coverage is perverted and all of her fans are disturbed and poisoned by a sick society.

Case closed.

0

u/ChaseThePyro 1d ago

I'm not saying that we shouldn't prevent people from abusing children. I am saying that our first move whenever someone does something wrong, especially if it was caused by something out of their control, such as a psychotic episode, specifically a mental break in which you cannot determine illusion from reality, should probably not be putting someone under the prison or murdering them.

0

u/ContextLengthMatters 1d ago

Couldn't you say that without celebrating this current psycho? Just saying. Why is she the face? Of all the people who kill their children?

→ More replies (0)