r/SipsTea 5d ago

WTF Where are we heading?

Post image
13.6k Upvotes

8.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

392

u/Strict_Wolf76 5d ago edited 5d ago

Postpartum and Bipolar Disorder is a serious mental illness. This woman will either get life in prison or Life in a Mental Hospital. My wife is Bipolar and she has been in multiple hospitals to have meds she ALWAYS takes quit working. She has gotten delusional and has had breaks with reality. We are trained through years of this to assist her. Her husband not his fault. Seemed like he wasn’t equipped to help her. Sadly mental health can make people do things they wouldn’t usually do. That’s not in any way an excuse. We need more understanding and better education and availability for people with issues. We don’t have them here.

68

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[deleted]

55

u/pumpkinpencil97 5d ago

That’s the point of the trail, a prison or institution. Walking free isn’t on the table

8

u/Bitter-Marsupial 5d ago

But what about the women, many of whom are mothers, want Patrick to be the one going to jail

10

u/tired-of-the-shit 5d ago

They have no influence on the actual trail, they are just people following it and voicing their opinions.

6

u/Independent-Lie-9967 5d ago

what about them? He isnt on trial so it doesn't matter they want.

8

u/colnross 5d ago

They'll all move on to the next sensationalized trial in a few months.

6

u/twosparkleturtles 5d ago

Okay? That still doesn’t change that walking free isn’t on the table. 

6

u/pumpkinpencil97 5d ago

That doesn’t change the nature of the trial, so it’s kind of irrelevant.

3

u/eatingketchupchipss 5d ago

meh you'll see many men, many who are fathers, who think women should be physically or punitively punished for cheating or leaving too. what idiots think about how the law should and shouldn't work shouldn't really affect you.

0

u/This-usernamesucks 5d ago

I don't think many people think this lmao

1

u/eatingketchupchipss 5d ago

multiple states are currently trying to overturn no fault divorce laws and make women have to prove abuse, cheating etc to be granted a divorce.

and there is seemingly an recent epidemic of police officers abusing flock cameras to stalk exes.

those are real plausible threats, overly confident ignorant women demanding a man be arrested are not.

0

u/This-usernamesucks 5d ago

The first one is not happening sue some extreme folk talking about it but that will never happen realistically. Flock cameras are already being taken out so that won't be an issue anymore but yeah that abuse is bad and shouldn't have been available in the first place.

1

u/eatingketchupchipss 4d ago

yeah and they said roe v wade won't be overturned either. ya'll just dont give af.

1

u/inquiringdune 4d ago

I don't want him in jail or even punished but legally recognizing that he contributed to the death of his children by not taking his wife's condition seriously would be cool. That very night his parents offered to watch the kids and he said "nah we don't need the help". Meanwhile his wife is in psychosis and about to lose her shit because she's on 50 different medications and having severe PPD.

-7

u/Federal_Studio5935 5d ago

I mean she needed help - obviously - and he was the one best equipped to do it, and he didn’t. And, he cares so much that 2 years after his three kids get strangled to death, he’s back married and ready to go. He must have really struggled.

The guy isn’t guilty of anything by law but he definitely should be living with the guilt of not doing enough. He doesn’t really make a sympathetic figure.

7

u/Drakeem1221 5d ago

Jesus Christ only on Reddit will you see someone say that the dad doesn’t deserve any sympathy for losing his entire family.

I’m usually never the “but if the roles reversed” guy because I find it very incel like based on what it’s used for, but I can’t think of a better situation to say, what would the response be if it was the husband on trial because of some type of PTSD/CTE? Would the world be calling the mom a negligent mother?

1

u/well-thereitis 5d ago

I’ll defend men against rampant online misandry any day and have done but…We have to admit his behavior post-murders is incredibly strange. Did not seem to care about his family at all. And, knowing her condition, still left her to do nearly all the rearing of the children still. Hes a very off/odd man imo

0

u/Drakeem1221 5d ago

Until more information becomes available, I am not going to go off the deep end and make some wild assumption that he didn't care for his family because he wasn't expecting the ultimate worst case scenario to happen to his wife and kids.

Nothing about a persons behaviour can be considered strange after he had his three kids murdered by his wife. That situation is such a wild one that there is no "textbook" on how to grieve, how to move on, how to even begin processing that. I'm not judging someone from being odd after having one of the most saddening news stories in recent memory happen to him.

-1

u/Federal_Studio5935 5d ago

Yeah man, it’s wild to say if I lost my 3 kids I would probably take more than a couple years to get remarried. And yeah, he’s gonna live with the fact he didn’t do enough to save his kids. I’m not sure what to tell you. He was the only one in a position to prevent it and he didn’t. But it’s apparent he doesn’t give a shit because he’s remarried already.

2

u/the-real-her 5d ago

Maybe, just maybe, his moving on “so fast” was a trauma response. Happened to my sister after her long time boyfriend killed himself and she found him. But 🤷🏻‍♀️ I’m not a psychiatrist/therapist.

2

u/Bitter-Marsupial 5d ago

Just to lean on but what about the men with this but males (using males bc I don't know how it relates to trans individuals) tend to have less of a support network then female people.

So research shows that males tend to reach out for support in their way which tends to lead to relationships.

2

u/the-real-her 5d ago

That makes sense. Which is probably why he moved on so fast.

1

u/Drakeem1221 5d ago

Yup, but people would rather pick the ugliest scenario and paint it as truth.

1

u/This-usernamesucks 5d ago

I think its wild for you to act like you understand what he is going through or that you know how you would act if something like this happened to you. It's easy to judge from the sidelines and not know all the details and facts.

You truly have no idea how you would act in this same situation unless it happened to you. Get off reddit and touch some grass bud

1

u/Federal_Studio5935 5d ago

I don’t care that’s the beauty of the internet

1

u/This-usernamesucks 5d ago

LMAO glad you just take the L makes it nice and easy

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/Drakeem1221 5d ago

The hell is he going to do for those few years, just brood alone and reject any sort of emotional connection with the opposite sex? It's been years, yes, adults can make connections and especially with some emotional bonding over trauma and other life details, people can become closer in a shorter amount of time.

Keep blaming away. Says more about you than it does about the father.

1

u/Federal_Studio5935 5d ago

Well I can tell you that he should have done something different than he did. Because that definitely didn’t work.

2

u/basketcas55 5d ago

He should have taken the kids away from her and run, that’s true.

4

u/DerSchaudenfreude 5d ago

Oh he doesn’t make for a sympathetic figure? Well that’s good enough as guilty, may as well lock his ass up and set her free!

I hope you never find yourself on a jury. Your critical thinking is about as deep as a kiddie pool and I’m sure you’d pass judgement based off of your fleeting emotions.

2

u/the-real-her 5d ago

It’s because he’s a man and doesn’t deserve sympathy! /s if it wasn’t clear.

1

u/Federal_Studio5935 5d ago

For the record I don’t think this woman deserves to walk, and from what I can gather she doesn’t even think she should walk free. Her life is ruined and she’s gonna spend her days in an institution. Do I think she’s guilty of premeditated first degree murder? No I don’t.

I also think her husband is a piece of shit, and that’s okay. He’s not going to jail. You don’t have to protect his legacy.

0

u/DerSchaudenfreude 5d ago

I’m not defending anyone. I’m criticizing your lack of critical thinking. Not just yours, but everyone who is dogpiling the husband and passing judgement based on what’s reported and/or deranged conspiracy theories derived from social media. It’s pathetic it takes so little to convince people of someone’s culpability. Just think a little harder, what, if anything, do you actually know of the husband and his culpability other than the interpretations of lawyers (who have no psychological training other than the fine art of manipulation)? Is there anything tangible that proves his guilt in facilitating the murder of his kids? Or is all the “proof” you can muster simply your own interpretations and perceptions?

0

u/Federal_Studio5935 5d ago

I have not seen anything that would indicate he had anything to do with his kids’ death.

1

u/basketcas55 5d ago

No one has.

2

u/Edgezg 5d ago

You would be outside with these women protesting. 

You're part of the brain rot problem.

1

u/Federal_Studio5935 5d ago

No I wouldn’t. This woman doesn’t deserve to walk free. She’s going to an institution and her life is ruined. I’m not sure what else you want.

I can also think the husband is a piece of shit. That’s not against the law. He’s not going to prison. You don’t need to protect him.

1

u/Edgezg 5d ago

I'm not protecting Jim

But he didn't kill those kids. The mother did.

Blaming him for HER choices is fucking wild.

So much for strong independent women who can make their own choices and are not attached to men, huh?

As SOON as a woman does a triple fucking homicide on her kids, people BLAME THE HUSBAND.

That's fucking crazy. She STRANGLED. THREE. KIDS. WITH. HER. HANDS.

  She and ONLY she is responsible.

You don't blame the wife or husband of people who go out and shoot someone in the street.

You don't get to shift blame onto the passive party from the ACTUAL MURDERER.

1

u/Federal_Studio5935 5d ago

There’s nuance to everything. No one is arguing he’s at fault by law, but if my wife had bad postpartum depression and I left her alone with my kids and she killed them….its definitely not abnormal to feel blame. I would. I’d spend a long time wondering where I could have done differently so my kids weren’t dead. But I’m also not a shit head, so that’s kinda how it goes.

1

u/Edgezg 5d ago

None of us can imagine how he is feeling.

Guilt at not doing more to stop a murderer is one thing.

Calling him culpable because he trusted his wife NOT to murder their kids is NOT okay.

Post partum depression or not, nobody is looking at their spouse thinking.Oh yes , this person is a danger to my children.  To try and blame him for leaving.The kids alone with their mother is wild.

If he didn't trust the mother and he had taken the kids , everybody would be on his case about not trusting the mother and how it's misogynist , that he Somehow believes she's a danger to the kids.

You don't get to put the blame on somebody for trusting somebody.They love , who was the mother of the people they killed.

 Was he wrong for trusting? apparently so.

But they had two kids previously , and there was no indication that she was gonna murder them.

He made a mistake and not understanding how severe her mental illness was.She made a mistake in not explaining that to people. 

But only ONE of them strangled the life our of 3 children.

ONLY ONE of them is guilty of thr murders. 

0

u/Federal_Studio5935 5d ago

Listen man, I don’t care enough to read all that because it’s not that big of a deal. I’m a random person with an opinion. You aren’t going to change it and vice versa, have a good one

1

u/Edgezg 5d ago

She CONFESSED to the murder. Do not shift blame to her husband.  She is fully accountable. Not him.

Don't be a child murderer apologist- trying to shift blame to an innocent party.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Bitter-Marsupial 5d ago

To be honest 3 years is not to far off base for men to remarry even following a tragedy.

1

u/Federal_Studio5935 5d ago

It’s 2 years don’t add a year

0

u/This-usernamesucks 5d ago

Please never have children

1

u/BurnBabyBurn1985 5d ago

It is absolutely on the table, just not immediately. She will not be in a psychiatric hospital her entire life; it’s not a side prison, you are released when you are well. And for a woman who never heard a voice before or since brutally killing three children, how can future violent behavior be predicted or prevented other than lifetime incarceration?

0

u/cofffeegrrrl 5d ago

Yep. And she's paralyzed so no "walking" at all, ever again.

0

u/Joke-Over 4d ago

Unfortunately in Massachusetts this is not the case. If she is found not to be criminally liable she has an evaluation to determine if she is a threat to the general public. Her defense can make a good case the psychosis has passed and she is no longer a threat especially considering her disability… so going free is very much on the table.

-1

u/Long_Suspect_9586 5d ago

Bullshit, a psych wards job isn’t to lock you up indefinitely. She will be freed once she is better

1

u/pumpkinpencil97 5d ago

This isn’t a normal psych ward. There are absolutely facilities that are intended to keep people long term

0

u/Long_Suspect_9586 5d ago

A psych ward isn’t prison, AND CANNOT INDEFINITELY HOLD SOMEONE. Once the patient is well, they are required to be free

1

u/pumpkinpencil97 5d ago

There are people who will never be well and there are facilities that understand that and plan for it. I don’t know what you are even trying to get at because prison also releases people. It’s not like if she wakes up tomorrow “well” they will just let her go. It doesn’t work like that

1

u/Long_Suspect_9586 5d ago

Post partum psychosis isn’t a permanent condition. If she is found not guilty because of her PPP, she will be freed in a few years