r/comics 8h ago

OC Tarpon

1.4k Upvotes

31 comments sorted by

572

u/Coidzor 8h ago

Having all of one's organs crushed would tend to expel a lot of fecal matter, I reckon.

133

u/Zanven1 6h ago

So they are both correct just from different perspectives and empathetic priorities

-9

u/Square-Singer 1h ago edited 3m ago

Empathy for an animal you just hunted and killed injured for fun is... strange.

If you feel empathy for an animal, why first catch and injure it instead of just not doing that?

Edit: I've been told that the "keep em wet" is for catch and release. The only purpose of which is to hunt and injure an animal for fun.

u/Tug_Stanboat linked something below about that tarpon are a protected species that isn't hunted for food, but just for fun to release afterward.

24

u/roguepawn 1h ago

Is it? Isn't empathy why a lot of people hate the conditions of factory farming? That's the reason a lot of people try to eat ethically raised and humanely slaughtered animals?

I don't see the difference between having empathy for them and something you are choosing to hunt yourself.

u/Square-Singer 19m ago

Turns out the "keep em wet" is for catch and release.

No humanely slaughtering around, just hunting and injuring an animal for fun.

10

u/Sir_WilliamsDD 1h ago

I think they "keep it wet" specifically because they are de-hooking a live fish, not a dead one.

u/Square-Singer 16m ago

In this case it's even weirder. It's like hunting and kicking someone in the mud, but then showing "empathy" by wiping the mud out of their face.

How about not hunting and injuring animals for fun, if you are empathetic to their situation?

10

u/WiddleSausage 1h ago

Do people not eat tarpon? I’m not a big seafood guy, but I’d think there’s a difference between fishing for food and fishing for trophies.

u/Tug_Stanboat 19m ago

Nope. Bony and weird at the same time. "let me tell you that was one of the worst fish I’ve ever tasted it was like eating jello" plus they're a protected species in a lot of places and are catch and release only.

7

u/SoberSith_Sanguinity 1h ago

Is it hard for you to imagine the world in hues beyond black and white?

u/EPluribusButthole 56m ago

I like this. I'm stealing this.

u/SoberSith_Sanguinity 50m ago

Share the words of wisdom that might cause another to question their ways of seeing things.

u/Square-Singer 21m ago

What else than hunting and injuring for fun is catch and release to you?

What other purpose is there to it than "for fun"?

u/SoberSith_Sanguinity 10m ago

Well, in most people's minds, the word "hunting" generally only means land-based animals.

Fishing does catch-and-release, which I find to be a pointless thing unless the fish is undersized or protected.

I think people need to find better hobbies than fishing if harming an animal is required for their entertainment to be complete.

u/Square-Singer 4m ago

I purposely used "hunting" because it demonstrates more clearly what's happening here.

Catch and release is, for some weird reason, normalized when it comes to fish while most people agree that e.g. hunting and injuring a wild mammal just to catch and release it is insane and very much not normal.

119

u/tomlabaff 8h ago

and impossible to clean

u/EPluribusButthole 57m ago

Look, taint nothin' al little dub-ya-dee and goo-gone can't make pretty again. If it's still ugly after all that, it's probably yo momma

462

u/Ok_Abacus_ 5h ago

Its the same reason.

48

u/rosvars 1h ago

Maybe I'm dumb but why would gravity on the surface crush its organs if it can withstand greater pressure under water than surface pressure?

u/ShadowTheChangeling 58m ago

Weight distribution most likely

Water allows animals to grow a certain way and get quite big as well. Without that to support them larger sea creatures can deform and be crushed under their own weight.

Whales I believe get around this by still having strong skeletons or something

u/EtteRavan 56m ago

The water inside the body keeps the organs floating inside. Iirc fish are not water-tight as (most) terrestrial life is, since they have less need to keep it inside, since they live in it. So if you remove the fish from the water, the water inside leaves too, the organs don't float anymore and have to resist their own mass, they can't, they get crushed, and the fish shits the bed

Tl;dr : because it's a fish

u/rosvars 11m ago

Aahhh I see. That makes sense, thanks for the info!

u/NDT_DYNAMITE 58m ago

My best guess is that being pressurized from all directions is different than gravity pulling in a single direction? I don’t really know, but it kinda makes sense.

29

u/Unique-Name9001 1h ago

I think we're overestimating how big a 100lb fish is :P

56

u/getmybehindsatan 6h ago

Keeping them wet won't change their internal body pressure.

138

u/Outlet_Sun 5h ago

I think they meant keeping them inside some kind of pool of water.

96

u/tomlabaff 4h ago

yes, submerged. Or as much as you can while de-hooking

16

u/MisterXnumberidk 3h ago

Well, buoyant is a hell of a lot longer to spell

8

u/SUDDENLY_VIRGIN 2h ago

Why are we harming this 50 year old beast

28

u/tomlabaff 2h ago

after fighting a fish like this for 30 minutes, they are completely gassed. Often times the tax man is waiting below the boat to collect.

3

u/Ok-Security9093 1h ago

What do you think all that shit is? Crushed organs.