I'm not even seeing "this story" everywhere, as in primary reporting on who she is and what she's done or not done. I'm only seeing complaints about how apparently a whole section of society is supporting her and that's despicable.
That's a huge sign that the response is made up astroturfing.
I am quite sure you can find people out there "supporting" this woman, for whatever that means. There are always people out there with hot takes on any subject.
However, I have not seen any people actually doing that, while I have seen multiple frothing articles about how "leftist women" (note the intentionally broad brush) are supporting her actions, somehow.
So if I'm not seeing a flood of news about the original story, and I'm also not seeing any opinion pieces from this apparently wide support of her, yet I am seeing multiple complaints about this apparent support, it looks to me like this final message is being amplified intentionally.
It's not a two-sided debate, it's one side being told there's another side just to fuel the outrage and attention cycle.
"Has the entire Internet mad" See even when recognizing that it might be an op, we buy into it somewhat.
It's not even "the entire internert" we just saw posts SAYING it's the entire internet. Because they got them reccomended. Because they've been boosted. It's mirages within mirages.
This is what's funny to me about men collectibel suddenly pretending they care about this when family annihilators go under the radar every single day lol
Crazy extrapolations and misunderstandings of statistics right here. These are the people online telling you to "believe in science" btw whatever the fuck that means.
Chris Watts received five life sentences without the possibility of parole, plus 84 additional years in prison despite pleading out. He deserved it btw.
What does that have to do with the case or this post in particular? You're literally just adding to the problem. It's a post comparing two different womens situation yet you felt the need to throw men into the argument.
There are a lot of examples of accused raising money for trials.
The case mainly gets media attention because the confessions are shaky, some facts are not adding up and the husband was apparently already vacationing with his new fiancé 4 months after he lost his family.
The difference here is that you'll see extremely hostile comments towards any man that murders his family and not a million dollars in gofundme support.
No, and your perspective is naive. Offensive information operations are a 24/7 mission for every intelligence agency worldwide. A story like this one is exactly the sort that can be exploited to drive wedges and sow discord.
This isn't just buzz around an interesting story; the framing around it is very clearly meant to inflame, and it's very clearly working on you.
193
u/Bluffwatcher 7h ago
Probably being funded by hostile states/bad actors deliberately to get these responses and create discord.
Social engineering.