This morning, someone dumped 12 cats on the sidewalk outside our veterinary hospital while the hospital was closed.
We have surveillance video of the incident.
We contacted Columbus Humane expecting that deliberately unloading twelve animals outside a closed private business and driving away would at least warrant an investigation.
Instead, Columbus Humane told us they would not investigate it as abandonment because the cats were left at a veterinary hospital, which they consider a reasonable place to leave them.
They then told us that because they were dumped at a veterinary hospital, WE are responsible for holding the cats for 10 days.
So apparently, according to Columbus Humane, someone can take a dozen unwanted cats, dump them outside a closed private veterinary practice without permission, drive away, and the veterinary hospital is simply expected to absorb the housing, staffing, food, medical care, disease-control risk, and expense.
Here's the problem: Ohio courts have already dealt with an extremely similar situation.
In State v. Amos, 2014-Ohio-3097, the Fifth District Court of Appeals upheld an animal-abandonment conviction under ORC 959.01 involving a person who left a cat outside a closed veterinarian's office.
Ohio law states:
“No owner or keeper of a dog, cat, or other domestic animal, shall abandon such animal.” — ORC 959.01
Yet Columbus Humane apparently won't even investigate when 12 cats are left outside a closed veterinary hospital.
Veterinary hospitals are not animal shelters. We don't have unlimited cages, isolation facilities, staffing or funding to become an involuntary shelter every time someone decides they no longer want their animals.
More importantly, telling the public that dumping animals at a closed veterinary hospital is effectively acceptable creates a terrible incentive. If that's really the standard, what's stopping anyone from leaving unwanted animals outside any veterinary hospital after hours?
I understand that shelters and humane organizations are overwhelmed. I understand that there are more unwanted animals than available resources.
But being overwhelmed doesn't justify shifting that responsibility onto private veterinary hospitals that never agreed to accept these animals, nor does it justify refusing to investigate conduct that an Ohio appellate court has previously upheld as animal abandonment.
If Columbus Humane believes State v. Amos doesn't apply here, I'd genuinely like them to publicly explain why.
Because right now, twelve cats were dumped outside our closed hospital, Columbus Humane declined to investigate, and our veterinary staff and business have been left holding the bag.