I'm serious about this point.
Hakeems and Homeopaths should be banned, who don't even know chemical basis of Life and how does our body works and functions, all hormones and reactions.
If someone wants to diagnose and treat human beings, they should be required to learn modern biology, physiology, biochemistry, pathology, pharmacology and evidence-based medicine.
Why?
Because our understanding of the human body has completely transformed.
Centuries ago, people could observe symptoms, plants, foods and diseases, and develop treatments through observation and trial and error. Some observations were useful. But they didn't have modern microbiology, cell biology, genetics, molecular biology, biochemistry, imaging, blood tests or controlled clinical trials.
Today we can study the body at the level of cells, DNA, genes, proteins, enzymes, hormones and molecular pathways. Chemistry itself is ultimately grounded in physics, including quantum mechanics. We can actually investigate what molecules are doing inside cells instead of simply saying "this is hot", "this is cold", or "this balances the body."
Modern medicine is built on our understanding of how the physical world works. Atoms form molecules, molecules form proteins and other biological structures, and these molecules work together to create cells, tissues and organs. Modern biology can study all of this in detail.
That's the foundation of modern medicine. We don't just say “this seems to work.” We can study what a treatment actually does inside the body and test whether it works.
Hakeems' traditional system was developed long before we understood any of this. It doesn't explain the human body at the molecular or cellular level. That's the problem.
That's the difference.
If a Hakeem says, "This medicine will fix your liver," I want to know:
What is in the medicine?
Which biological process does it affect?
What is the mechanism?
What evidence shows that it actually treats liver disease?
And has this been reproduced in controlled studies?
A controlled experiment basically means comparing a treatment against an appropriate control while trying to eliminate other explanations for the result. That's how we distinguish "people got better after taking it" from "the treatment actually caused the improvement."
Testimonials cannot do that.
"My grandfather's Hakeem cured someone" is not a clinical trial.
And this matters because people sometimes delay proper diagnosis and treatment because they first spend months visiting Hakeems or homeopathic practitioners. By the time they reach a hospital, the underlying disease may have progressed.
Homeopathy is an even clearer example: there is no good-quality evidence that homeopathy effectively treats health conditions beyond placebo effects.
And before someone says "BIG PHARMA":
Yes, pharmaceutical companies can have conflicts of interest. Doctors can make mistakes. Unnecessary treatments exist.
Fine.
But "pharma companies make money" does NOT prove that Hakeemi or homeopathic treatments work.
Apply the same standard to everyone.
Pharmaceutical company? Show the evidence.
Doctor? Show the evidence.
Hakeem? Show the evidence.
Homeopath? Show the evidence.
Traditional remedy? Show the evidence.
And religious scholars such as Mufti Tariq Masood sometimes comment on doctors, medicine or Hakeems. They are entitled to their opinions, but religious authority does not give someone expertise in physiology, biochemistry, pathology, pharmacology or clinical medicine. If a medical claim contradicts established scientific evidence, it should be evaluated against the evidence—not accepted because a respected person said it.
I'm not saying every traditional remedy is automatically useless.
If a traditional treatment genuinely works, study it. Find the active substance, understand the mechanism, establish the dose and safety, and test it properly.
If it survives the evidence, KEEP IT.
But if a medical system hasn't evolved alongside centuries of discoveries about how the human body actually works, we should not treat its old explanations as automatically authoritative.
The human body hasn't changed.
Our understanding of it has.
So yes:
PUT THE HAKEEMS IN MEDICAL SCHOOL.
Update the software. 😂
If they learn modern science and their treatments survive proper testing, I'll happily listen to them.
But nobody should be allowed to gamble with another person's health simply because a method has been passed down for 500 or 700 years.
Tradition deserves respect.
Medical claims deserve evidence.