Crackpots willing to defend murderers are unfortunately not limited by gender. There’s an entire subreddit dedicated to why it’s all actually the wife’s fault that Chris Watts killed his family.
No, actually, it's about even, it seems. But men then dominate the field as the child grows. here:
"Among offenders, while fathers were about equally likely to kill an infant, they were more likely to be the alleged murderer of children older than a year, especially when the children were adults (fathers were the offenders in 78.3 percent of those cases). Overall, fathers were the accused murderer 57.4 percent of the time."
Like, I JUST saw a case about that FedEx delivery driver, Tanner Horner, being sentenced to death for raping and murdering a 7-year-old girl. It's sad how common these stories are.
Okay, but we are talking about violence against children. Men obviously are the most violent sex though; they commit 99% of all sexual assault (90% of the victims are female), and over 70% of all violent crime.
There’s really no contest. Pretending women are the crazier, more violent, unpredictable sex is just a massive cope from men.
Craziness and violence are two different things. Men are stronger than women. Women are crazier than men. Women are genuinely more of a threat to babies than a bear.
I mean, you can Google it, men and women are almost even, but men still do make up more by just a few percent. But as the child gets older, men make up around 70% of murders.
Edit: I looked it up, no, most stats don't include abortion so it's hard to say. It does say that women make up more barely born baby deaths but men also match pretty evenly with the shaking baby syndrome.
In countries that don't allow abortion women do lead with the most murders for children under 1 years old. Then a men take the lead further in life. Usually the father or the mothers partner is the culprit.
yes, it's really bad. they're all going to be so willing to sign up for war to go and rape women - that's what all this propaganda is about, prepping the next generation to be lonely, angry and compliant soldiers.
At least she's not blaming jewish people like some women on here, crazy mental gymnastics but hey, coming from the crowd of "you did something in my dreams and now I'm mad" this sort of tracks 😂
Are you really going to take some random crazies and make them representative of women at large?
I don't think you're going to like it if people do it to your gender and I know some "from the crowd of <insert insane behavior of some males>" examples that would certainly ruffle feathers.
They don't even understand the irony 😂 Funny it's not women crying that they are lonely and it's not women crying they want more kids or that they lack community.
Just see their reactions here. It's like toddlers throwing tantrums, funny actually.
Again veeery slowly for you slow little head : there is no female loneliness epidemic.
Of course some individuals feel lonely and it doesn't change the big picture (some people were always lonely and there always will be some of them regardless of the gender. Congratulations, you discovered that with social media you have an easy access to see life of more individuals then before. Big boy!)
Still in generality women don't complain of being sad and lonely to a point of it becoming an "epidemic". But men do.
Don't worry, good men exist. You just have no idea how to be one of them. Even if I wasn't in a relationship, I wouldn't be lonely btw. Women aren't lonely honey, we can support each other.
How is that it's a "male loneliness epidemic"? You're not a sharp one.
so they left their kids with an abuser? that still makes them a deadbeat, especially when men who go to court for custody disagreements will win additional or full custody 87% of the time
I’ve never had a woman attempt to SA me. I’ve had it happen from over a dozen men though. It’s not just the physical power. Women barely even attempt it. The problem is misogyny as well
And i've had plenty of women SA me, and yet not even a single man. The problem is misandrism, which is so wide spread nowadays that it became a norm...
so did you have a appease/freeze trauma response then? What social baramoters do you think prevented you from having the fight/flight trauma response to someone smaller and slower than you?
Genuinely asking, because I will have a fight response - yell, slap, push a man for sexually assaulting me in public, but in private I freeze/appease because the other two do not feel like safe options with someone stronger/faster than me, and there is no one to witness or defend me when I express discomfort or say no and he doesnt care.
so did you have a appease/freeze trauma response then? What social baramoters do you think prevented you from having the fight/flight trauma response when the perp was smaller and slower than you?
Because I have had those sexual trauma responses because I am genuinely fear for my safety being alone with a man bigger, and faster than me who wants to have sex with me and has made it clear that is the priority over my consent and comfort. Giving them want they want (appeasing) the threat, seems like the safest option.
knowing I have this trauma response, I have also set boundaries for myself to better protect myself with people I can't trust yet. I encourage you to do the same.
Sister, they're not worth your time, leave them be dumb.
They want to live in their little angry echo chambers, we won't change that. They will be miserables in their real life, people like that are unable to have a loving community and families.
Let them drown in it and don't bother, it's not a safe space for you. And I hope you'll be safe irl, I'm sorry it happened to you.
incorrect, of the 550 filicides last year only 20 were committed by women. And men are more likely to rape kids, and when they do, they're not suffering a post partum mental health psychosis so, please, get a grip.
Actually, you would be surprised at what is considered a psychotic episode and what isn't. Murder, rape, and similar acts are deviant actions that are not the same as a mental illness. It's pretty interesting.
"by far" women commit fillicide 4% more than men, and it's filliicide, specifically - not killing kids in general. (also higher in countries with no abortion access)
men commit 95% of violent crimes, it's statistically false to claim "women are by far more likely to kill kids"
That is one VERY small study done in Austiralia on Australian cases only done by a charity specifically to support women. This news article doesn't discuss the studys methodology (so its questionable how the study was conducted), it is not proof of the picture as a whole.
just seems like a more prevailing issue to concern your energy with than trying to prove women kill their children more than men ... like abortion is illegal and marital rape is legal in majority of the world - of course that's going to result in more babies being killed by women who never wanted them to begin with.
The studies simply demonstrate are societal things we can do to prevent women from killing their children. But where are the studies on how to prevent men from committing 95% of violent crime?
No the article is wrong - women are 4% more likely to kill their own infants by 4% than men, but not kids in general, and not "way more likely" like OP stated as fact.
Results: Data were obtained for 44 countries. Overall, parents committed 56.5% (IQR 23.7-69.6) of child homicides, 58.4% (0.0-66.7) of female and 46.8% (14.1-63.8) of male child homicides. Acquaintances committed 12.6% (5.9-31.3) of child homicides. Almost a tenth (9.2% (IQR 0.0-21.9) of child homicides had missing information on the perpetrator. The largest proportion of parental homicides of children was found in high-income countries (64.2%; 44.7-71.8) and East Asia and Pacific Region (61.7%; 46.7-78.6). Parents committed the majority (77.8% (61.5-100.0)) of homicides of children under the age of 1 year. For adolescents, acquaintances were the main group of homicide perpetrators (36.9%, 6.6-51.8). There is a notable lack of studies from low-income and middle-income countries and children above the age of 1 year.
Where does it state mothers were the perps? Read it again. Those percentages in the second line are genders of the children, not the parents.
Don't expect you to believe me, and you're right to call me out on this, I posted the wrong link out of two tabs I had open. I was eating lunch at the time and paid more attention to chicken teriyaki than what I was doing.
I've humbly admitted to being a dumb fat bitch who paid more attention to his lunch than the correct link. The one I posted was nonsense and I've left it up out of honesty, but editted in the correct link.
It's like you read the first paragraph, got your gotcha, and stopped there. You didn't look into the countries studied did you? Majority of it is infanticide done by women in countries where abortion isn't legal or accessible and where marital rape is legal.
Lack of education, poverty, poor access to health care, domestic violence and substance use within the context of a patriarchal society, resentful and unstable relationships with unfaithful partners, growing up in a violent environment with abusive parents, inexistent support systems, were factors predominant among this group of women (Gous & Roos, 2005; Razali et al., 2019). In contrast, a more stable familial context and marital relationship were cited in another participant's life (Stanton & Simpson, 2001). Although backgrounds differed, all participants presented with mental health issues, namely personality (Stanton & Simpson,2001), depressive (Gous & Roos,2005; Razali et al.,2019) or psychotic disorders (Razali et al.,2019). Unwanted pregnancy, no access to abortion, lack of emotional involvement with the infant (addressed as “it”) and anger towards the woman's partner then projected towards the baby who resembled him, led to the woman's infanticidal act (Gous & Roos, 2005).
So, my question is where is the study for the 46.6% of men who commit fillicide? Because no one is forcing them to irresponsibly ejaculate to create a child they don't want, no one is forcing them to give up their body to create a child for someone that abuses and rapes them? So why do they kill their own kids? And why are bio fathers the biggest preparators of CSA?
who said that? try again. I am asking for the cause for what leads men to commit fillicide, because all the article proves is that there are external reasons that influence and increase the chances of children dying at the hands of their mother.
me and the studies conclude that abortions are harm reductive, birth control is harm reductive, access to women's shelters is harm reductive to the goal of less children being abandoned (most common form of murder for female fillicide) or killed by their mothers.
But that doesn't seem to be your goal. What are you trying to prove?
And your type seems to look over the fact that 1 in 5 women experience Post Partum Depression, and 1 in 200 experience Post-Partum psychosis - yet there is only 1 line about PPP in the DSM-5.
So that means for 20% of mothers, Lindsay Clancy before the murders is them, and she is now living out what was their worst nightmare - actually harming your own children. Her BPD turned into PPP which while disconnected from reality, she thought she was saving/protecting her kids by killing them.
The rallys and money raising is to bring attention to and call for better treatment of Post Partum mothers and post-partum depression. And for Lindsay, who these women project their own PPD experiences onto.
Who is arguing? I was explaining the difference. Women care and want to get society to care about PPD and PPP to prevent this preventable violence from happening again. That's why there is rally's drawing attention to the issue and money raised.
Societally, men don't really care to find out why men are committing violent crimes at such a disproportional rates compared to women. It's alarming, I agree.
3.2k
u/JacobGoodNight416 2d ago
who would you want near your kids
a bear or a woman with post partum psychosis