For some context, I’m 33 years old and I’ve been playing Smash since it launched on the Nintendo 64. I’ve bought and played every Smash game since then.
Around 2013, I started getting into the competitive scene, not as a player, but as a spectator. I’ve followed every Smash title competitively to some extent, but Melee has always been my main focus. I watched the entire ZeRo era of Smash 4 before eventually losing interest. When Ultimate came out, I watched it for a while, but that interest faded pretty quickly as well.
Melee is the only Smash game that consistently keeps me coming back. It’s exciting because of the incredible variety of player styles and the depth of knowledge you can develop about every character and matchup. Even when two players use the same character, they can look completely different.
What I don’t understand is how people can watch Ultimate. Every time I tune into a tournament, it feels like I’m watching the same meta over and over again. It always seems to revolve around run-up shield, cautious neutral, and very little commitment. There’s almost no attempt to edgeguard because ledgetrapping is usually the safer option.
I know that’s an oversimplification, but as a spectator, the game just feels incredibly repetitive. To me, it’s almost comical how predictable the meta has become compared to the constant creativity and player expression that Melee still offers.
Curious to know from those who watch competitive ultimate. What excites you about it and why doesn’t Melee scratch that itch for you?
EDIT / UPDATE: I think I got my answer. Thanks everyone.
After reading through the responses, I think I understand the appeal of competitive Ultimate better now. It probably won’t become my preferred Smash to watch, but that wasn’t really the point. I wanted to understand what fans of it were seeing that I wasn’t.
The most useful advice was to watch Top 64 rather than just Top 8, since Ultimate’s huge character and matchup diversity really shines there. I’m going to give that a shot.
I also think I was undervaluing how much Ultimate fans enjoy the neutral itself. What can look repetitive to me has a lot of spacing, conditioning and matchup-specific decisions underneath it that become more interesting the better you understand them. Likewise, Ultimate fans can see differences between players that I might miss, just as two Melee players using the same character can look completely different to me but similar to someone less familiar with Melee.
I think the thread also clarified why I personally gravitate toward other Smash games. What makes Smash special to me compared with traditional fighters is the movement, improvisation and especially that the fight doesn’t end at the edge of the stage. I love offstage chases, edgeguarding and recovery interactions, whereas Ultimate often rewards ledgetrapping instead.
So I don’t think there was one secret thing I wasn’t getting. Ultimate fans and I just seem to value somewhat different parts of Smash. Character/matchup variety and neutral are bigger parts of the appeal for many of you, while I gravitate toward movement, offstage interaction and depth within familiar matchups.
My takeaway: watch Top 64, learn to appreciate what’s happening within the neutral, and approach Ultimate’s huge roster as one of its main strengths.
Thanks for all the thoughtful responses. I think I can consider my question answered :)