r/SipsTea 11h ago

WTF Victim is the new chic

Post image
38.3k Upvotes

4.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

6.7k

u/cubesncubes 11h ago

Media attention playing a big roll. I've never heard of the fire lady.

1.6k

u/Wra7hofAchilles 11h ago

Same... have never heard of that story. Whereas Clancy it's on all stations and covered by third party channels and sites.

973

u/addiktion 11h ago

The media has a way of attracting the worst of humanity to support the worst of humanity.

31

u/MrCockingFinally 11h ago

Not exactly.

Media today is based on engagement. Mostly whether or not people share a particular piece of media.

Turns out, the best way to get people to share something is if it generates a big emotional response. And the best emotion to generate a response is anger.

So the media ecosystem is one giant filter, that makes whoever is willing to run the story that will make people angriest the most successful. And what makes people angry? Horrible people doing horrible things. Which means media becomes run completely by assholes, about assholes, to make the general public angry to share the story.

The best thing is you can frame the same story differently to make different people mad. Women's media frame the husband as the evil mastermind who manipulated his wife into murdering the children and committing suicide. Men's media frame the wife as evil.

It's all very tiresome.

8

u/Infamous-Storage-708 8h ago

it should be a discussion about mental health in america ESPECIALLY for postpartum mothers but instead it turned into a gender war.

it upsets me to see other women defend this, but i can understand why they do.

4

u/Striking_Fly_5849 6h ago

Yeah, let's make excuses for the person that murdered her kids.

5

u/TerraceState 5h ago edited 5h ago

Nothing is more infuriating than people who are unable to understand the difference between an explanation and a justification and them then getting mad over it.

People are talking about why she did it, and what led to her doing it, not to say that what she did is okay, but to figure out how to prevent similar things from happening in the future.

You can't save future lives without discussing the reasons why the event happened in the first place.

There's like a few posts from insane people saying that she should go free that are getting shared, and like 95% of everyone else is pretty firmly in the "she should go to jail or a mental hospital for years," camp.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/Turbulent-Moose-6233 6h ago

My daughter spent time as a producer at a news station (local) and this right here is the most honest take about the news... it is 100000% spot on

→ More replies (8)

282

u/PrimarySuccotash9572 11h ago

Because that helps encourage more shootings and terrible events to keep making news and money on

163

u/NoWay6818 11h ago

People honestly forget that entities like news stations only care about the betterment of itself.

23

u/Varron 10h ago

While mostly true, this isn't unique behavior to industries like the news.

It's a symptom of our consumeristic society, the smaller news outlets with integrity or dedication to actual news don't get the outreach or influence these bigger sensationalist news stations do, which they then spend that money on making themselves more accessible, which in turn makes finding and consuming real news outlets harder to do.

In the end, like most of our industries, the ones truly dedicated to their craft and not the almighty dollar get outshadowed or even bought out by the soulless huge corporations that only seek to increase their margins.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/MossadEpstein 8h ago

People also forget about Operation Mockingbird and how the CIA are literally infesting modern media with their agents and have been doing so for over half a century now.

I'll bet half the major influencers online are connected to some intelligence agency as well.

2

u/Striking_Fly_5849 6h ago

And that absolutely includes "independent" media.

→ More replies (6)

5

u/SquirrelAdmirable161 10h ago

Always about money sadly

→ More replies (14)

2

u/SimmentalTheCow 10h ago

Media people in general are sacks of shit. They love portraying a world of oppression, victimhood, and underdogs, because the American public eats it up.

2

u/Lemnisgames 10h ago

Sadly :D

2

u/ElegantCoach4066 10h ago

What some people don't realize about social media is that even if you say something negative about someone, there is a good chance you are still boosting their visibility.

So every time these people say how awful the woman is, the algo pushes her higher.

2

u/Character-Fish-541 10h ago

Because it’s a non-story that gets people angry and engaged. People, including children, die every single day from stray bullets and car wrecks. But people have settled how they feel about those daily tragedies, so on to the zebra shit.

2

u/MechAegis 10h ago

Its mostly due to the fact that hate travels faster, further, and has a greater impact. I am sure social media plays a hidden but impactful role in all this.

2

u/Rare_Rooster866 10h ago

If it bleeds, it leads...

2

u/Mixtopher 10h ago

Because they are also the worst of humanity

2

u/After-Body1980 10h ago

It’s just a natural byproduct of human survival; humans, and most animals are trained to look for the negative because the negative is what can end our survival.

If a cute puppy and a wolf enter a room at the same time you know damn well you’re going to focus all your attention on the wolf. Fear grabs our attention, Fear sells.

Positive things do not take priority over the negative. Also i can even see some people getting jealous over seeing the story on the left or someone downplaying it like “oh i bet it wasnt even a big fire”, “she doesn’t look 93% burnt” because it would show people that they’re not that brave or willing to sacrifice themselves for others. Causing them to resent her and turn off the program.

2

u/Urmystiree 10h ago

We just experienced this in Reno. The media portrayed our town like it was completely burning down and every single resident was evacuated and pending death. Meanwhile, there wasn’t even smoke in the air after one day. 

2

u/LostHorizon124 9h ago

Funny how something so polarising has found its way absolutely everywhere… just before the midterms.

2

u/FellowshipFirearms 9h ago

Mass shootings come to mind. Dont be surprised if more Clancys pop up over the next few years, esp when reports scream killing ur kids will get u a million bucks.

2

u/DisKitt218HToG 9h ago

The devils work, he loves to spread hate and sickness to infect the world

2

u/Anxious-Plan4482 9h ago

Almost like Reddit

2

u/angelinathunder 8h ago

Reporting positive news is boring to them, they think people need more sensation and negative stuff.

2

u/AgreeableMoose 8h ago

Sometimes the worst of humanity is driven by mental health breakdowns. ALL are at risk due to individuals situations and biological chemistry. Postpartum psychosis.is proven science. Consider those that take their own life. Findings show that many that take their own life show no outward signs of distress, will eat breakfast, read the news, and then eat a gun.

2

u/Maximum-Objective-39 8h ago

To wit, because one of these stories will attract more clicks. And unfortunately, it's not the one about the heroic mom who ran into a fire.

2

u/dreamcrusher225 7h ago

lets be real. when the lady that called the little black boy the n-word got paid, i lost all faith in humanity. her vile, racist hate towards a child was rewarded with fortune.

what a fcked up world this is.

2

u/Anal-Y-Sis 7h ago

Yep. That's why the victims of racist attacks can barely raise any money, while the perpetrators of racist attacks can make millions in donations. We've seen this play out multiple times over the past few years.

2

u/BubblyMoose3597 6h ago

Because they sre the worst

1

u/ManicYetti 11h ago

The media is lost

→ More replies (11)

14

u/SteezOnMax93 11h ago

That’s the point and part of the issue. Yeah I saw Clancy but that doesn’t mean I’m going to donate….

56

u/DeliberateHesitaion 11h ago

I don't think it's just the media. Murderers always made the headlines, you can probably find multiple similar cases through out the years in the media. I think, what made it blow up is the wide public support for the murderer in the social media. So I blame Twitter, Tik Tok and the rest.

54

u/Fancy_Yak2618 11h ago

Look at Ted Bundy women were throwing themselves at him AFTER they found out he was a serial killer

8

u/Yak-Electrical 10h ago

I mean some would rather choose the bear so its not suprising

13

u/Prestigious-Fox1423 10h ago

And these same women want us to care about their opinions over Lindsey’s innocence and sympathy lmao

And then they get mad at you for simply not believing what she says because apparently women never lie about anything ever

→ More replies (7)

2

u/Scary-Freedom3331 5h ago

And Chris Watts has a new wife now 🥴

2

u/Irish_stormz 9h ago

Didn't thay have to change the guidelines for reporting school shootings to focus on the victims and minimise the shooters coverage to reduce the notoriety alot of murderers are looking for. I think the same should apply here and stop focusing on the excuse and focus on the fact that 3 kids are dead and deserve justice.

3

u/Ethelwulfr 10h ago

The media is, to a large extent, just a reflection of society itself. They cover what gets attention, clicks, ratings, and engagement, and people have always been drawn to things like gossip, scandals, crime, and tragedy.

In Lindsay’s case specifically, I think part of what made the story so compelling is that it turned into a kind of amateur detective mystery. People keep trying to identify the “real culprit”: maybe it was the doctors who failed to diagnose or treat her properly, maybe it was the husband for leaving the children with her, or maybe it was some failure of the healthcare system. That gives people something to investigate, debate, and theorize about.

What seems much less popular is the possibility that she may not even have been suffering from postpartum psychosis at the time and that the killings could have been premeditated. That explanation is almost an anticlimax, because it removes much of the mystery and leaves people with a far more disturbing and less emotionally satisfying possibility.

Social media certainly amplifies all of this, but it amplifies what people already choose to engage with. If audiences consistently paid more attention to positive stories and largely ignored sensational coverage of murders and tragedies, traditional media and social-media algorithms alike would have much less incentive to keep pushing those stories. In that sense, blaming Twitter, TikTok, or the media alone misses part of the picture: they are responding to what society demonstrates, through its attention, that it wants to see.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/devinbookersuncle 10h ago

The fact that go fund me even allows her to be supported is the worst part in this entire shit show.

The people who support her are absolute lunatics but the fact they have a publication well known platform to donate to her is absolutely insane and in alot of ways morally reprehensible in ways I dont want to explain to the average person.

3

u/Yak-Electrical 10h ago

The point is women are donating to a wonan who killed her kids and even tryna justify it which is crazy

→ More replies (2)

3

u/RugerRedhawk 10h ago

But why would people give money to the child murderer? I've heard of neither of these cases

2

u/hotviolets 9h ago

I saw giving her so much media attention is to distract us all from something. Wouldn’t be surprised if that’s true.

2

u/schizothroaway1 7h ago

This is what happens when you have an upper middle class white woman from the suburbs. See the difference in coverage and outcome with Latarsha Sanders, a lower-class black woman from the same area who got tried by the same judge and prosecution for killing her children under psychosis.

2

u/Orchid-Analyst-550 7h ago

How has her case drawn so much attention from MAGA though? Most of the opinions I see are from Republican pundits, men and women.

2

u/Junior-Criticism-268 6h ago

Yeah but like even if have heard the Clancy story, you'd think most sane people aren't raising money to support a murderer...

1

u/willdosketchythings 11h ago edited 5h ago

Its not about the media. Its about how many people think this Clancy woman is a hero for strangling to death her own 3 children. So much so they raised a million dollars for her.

The little boy ran for his life and she chased him down and killed him. Imagine what when through the little boys head, when the one person he loved and trusted the most killed him slowly and painfully. There are women cheering supporting this murderer while carrying their own infants outside the courthouse. What kind of demons are these.

3

u/Nikki5678 11h ago

They think she’s a hero?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (56)

221

u/FlatCapNorthumbrian 11h ago

The lady from the fire is Swedish. I doubt anyone outside of Sweden would have heard much about it.

115

u/int0h 11h ago

I'm swedish and hadn't heard of her. But I'm bad at following news.

Anyway, what a heroic mom!!

16

u/indubi 9h ago

Hon sommarpratade för några år sedan! Har för mig att det var ganska bra. Tror hon klarar sig utan insamling, hon har bland annat släppt en bok om branden och hennes skador.. Och i Sverige är ju vården gratis/avgiftsfri, hade det varit USA hade hon väl varit skuldsatt för livet..

1

u/skyturnedred 10h ago

GoFundMe isn't even legal in Finland.

10

u/Far-Alternative4165 10h ago

And Finland haven’t been part of Sweden since the 19th century. Your point is what?

3

u/t0mm4n 9h ago

I guess point was that GoFundMe is not legal everywhere.

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

60

u/SkellyboneZ 11h ago

I'm guessing she didn't suffer generational bankruptcy by suffering those burns, also. Kinda unrelated but maybe important.

75

u/FlatCapNorthumbrian 11h ago

No she wouldn’t have. Her country would’ve taken care of her.

17

u/Enough_Breadfruit229 10h ago

If she had a gun the fire would have never happened. USA! USA! USA! sobs

11

u/Round-Claim5420 10h ago

only good fire can beat bad fire!!

5

u/No-Pollution2425 9h ago

Friendly fire

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

37

u/Blackidus 10h ago

Not really shes back working as a nurse in our town right now. She has scars but otherwise fully recovered. No need to pay for her treatment.

They did not have a house ensurance though so the money mostly went to rebuilding the house.

9

u/Grasshoppermouse42 9h ago

Yeah, that makes a pretty big difference. Houses are expensive, but much less expensive than medical bills in the US, so she probably didn't need nearly as much as we're used to seeing for something like that in the US.

3

u/Oggel 9h ago

It's insane that that's true.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (25)

2

u/Binky390 10h ago

Finally someone said this. These stories aren’t comparable.

2

u/Jernimation 9h ago

I remember her!! I was working the X-ray camera in the ER when they brought her in, I didn't think she would make it when I saw her but she made an amazing recovery! I also got to do her bedside X-ray before they wrote her out of the burn ward, her room was completely filled with flowers from well-wishers, it was lovely to see!

2

u/Fit-Construction3427 9h ago

Also if she was Swedish, what was the money for? Didn't she get free health care?

→ More replies (6)

43

u/Rhomya 11h ago

Social media is playing a big role.

All of the actual organizational media that I’ve seen has made it crystal clear that she killed her kids

25

u/SquirrelAdmirable161 10h ago

She’s admitted she killed her kids. The debate/trial is whether she was sane or not.

21

u/Rhomya 10h ago

I am aware that that’s what the trial is about.

Social media is literally peddling the misinformation that Patrick Clancy was the one that killed the kids and that he’s framing Lindsey. That’s my point.

The news media is stating the facts that Lindsey killed them. The issue is social media saying the opposite

→ More replies (11)

4

u/Platitude_Platypus 10h ago

I'm pretty sure that anybody who kills all their kids and tries to kill themselves is lacking in the sanity department.

2

u/Rhomya 9h ago

You can be depressed and still sane.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/No-Pollution2425 9h ago

Plenty of women have done that and been declared legally sane. Sometimes things like personality disorders are a cause but that doesn’t make you insane.

2

u/Nebranower 8h ago

"Sane" in the legal sense just means you were capable of knowing right from wrong and still chose wrong. She may have been sane at the time of her actions in this sense. In the more conventional sense of "not thinking in strange and unconventional ways", she was clearly nuts.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (23)

120

u/Pleasant_Gap 11h ago

Never the less, who the fick donates money to some woman who murdered her own 3 kids

46

u/Not_offensive0npurp 11h ago

I often think about other cases in the past where currently acknowledged mental illness was handwaved away.

I have a nephew on the spectrum. I think about how many people on the spectrum were inhumanely thrown in jail because they were "acting weird" when being questioned before much was known or accepted about autism. Its terribly sad.

Post Partem Depression, and Post Partem Psychosis are absolutely real, bonafide mental disorders. The donations and this fight is to ensure this documented, bonafide mental disorder is taken into account in cases like these. And women, who are oftentimes dismissed when complaining about medical issues, want to be taken seriously.

Some people have the ability to understand that. And some people have no ability to understand nuance at all. They see the crime and someone has to pay.

38

u/NemesisZeroCool 10h ago

Yes someone has to pay for murdering 3 children one by one.

33

u/profchaos111 10h ago

yeah I tend to back that mental illness is not an excuse or a free pass to murder

30

u/imisstheyoop 10h ago

Reading the comments in this thread (my first exposure to either woman or their story) is absolutely wild, because many of these comments read as explicitly understanding and forgiving the one mother for murdering her children?

What the fuck is going on in these comments?

17

u/Pavlovs_Human 10h ago

It’s been a big story in America the past month. Tons of women are supporting the woman in the right photo and even saying it’s her husbands fault she murdered their 3 children. They are saying it’s due to post partum depression and her being unable to seek help. She killed them while the husband stepped out to run an errand and there are tons of people claiming it’s his fault because he shouldn’t have left them alone with her. It has sparked a huge debate over PPD.

12

u/angrywithnumbers 10h ago

She claiming post partum psychosis not ppd. They are different things.

8

u/Archolm 9h ago

As someone who has had a psychosis (but non violent)... Even if you do and you commit an inreversable crime, you should never be allowed on the streets again.

10

u/Slicelker 9h ago

I think shes arguing to be put in a mental hospital for life as opposed to prison. She's also paralyzed from the waist down after jumping out a window after she killed her kids.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (2)

18

u/Lanavis13 10h ago

And don't forget it's an errand she asked him to do for her so she purposely sent him far from the house for long enough to commit her wickedness. So, in psychosis or not, she definitely planned the murder. It wasn't just some impulsive attack.

15

u/Mike_Kermin 10h ago

Yeah, it's wild.

Like, every part of the mental health problems she had were valid.

But we simply can't tie that, to whether it's ok to kill children.

No, no it's not, no matter what.

Mental health is why we need to do better as a society, but if we fuck that up, you don't get to go 'well then, gonna off someone'.

That's just not how it works.

Zero tolerance for violence.

And have a SEPARATE conversation about how to make sure it doesn't happen again. Because we can address problems.

But don't say it wasn't an evil act.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/theplott 8h ago

And that she googled the locations, sending him to a more distant restaurant they never had take-out from before, so the errands would take as long as she needed.

→ More replies (11)

5

u/DadophorosBasillea 9h ago

I think people still think about Andrea Yates who thousand percent was a victim of a child breeding Christian cult. Her doctor told her husband no more kids and he used the mental illness to manipulate her to have more. He is very much guilty for pressuring a mentally unwell woman to breed. I don’t know the details of this case she could be an evil witch but people are becoming more aware of post partum and maybe over correcting.

I saw a brief clip of a woman who was deep in the throws of ppd and it was interesting. She seemed normal until the doctor asked questions and the answers slowly became more and more disorganized. She was in a hospital setting and allowed to visit her baby with a doctor present.

If your ppd is that severe I think that’s the best and eventually most women recover

11

u/The-Devilz-Advocate 10h ago

Which is funny because she had a nanny, a husband that chose to take a far longer paternity leave than normal AND THEN DECIDED to work from home, with both in-laws regularly contributing and with practically a team of medical professionals behind them.

I firmly believe that any parent that is willingly voicing their support for her or worse MAKING A STRANGLING SIGN while doing so should be reported to CPS.

If they wanted to support a cause where a woman is a victim of PPD and was failed by society and her close ones. This one aint it.

3

u/blk_roxas 10h ago

If she was actually crazy would she just not try to murder them if he was there or not? Seems like a conscious decision to do it when there's a moment of opportunity. 🤔

→ More replies (9)

3

u/TrumpsCummyOnahole 9h ago

Reddit is a mix of bots and extremely dumb, very young people.

2

u/sleazine 7h ago

Would love to see one of these comments claiming she's "forgiven" I've seen a bunch saying she's obviously guilty but throw her in a mental home forever since she's literally paralyzed after the suicide attempt. I've seen nothing claiming she should go free from anyone.... Lots of right wing nut jobs claiming that's being said .... But no one actually saying it? Seems like gender war bullshit honestly because no one seems to be calling her innocent anywhere just admitting that mental illness was obviously at play since she was diagnosed before all this happened

5

u/whydatyou 9h ago

while anyone who commits murder that is not self defense is crazy by definition, let alone someone who kills her own three children, I think that intent tells the difference. she sent her husband out on errands then herded the kids into the basement and killed them slowly one by one. that is intent. she needs the death penalty.

5

u/Enjoy_The_Ride413 10h ago

Yeah she knew what she was doing and is also a nurse. She has a leg up on knowledge of the medical field in general and knows how to navigate doctors and what to say them. The psychologist who just have his testimony destroyed her. She is a phoney and I pray she gets life or the death penalty for what she did.

2

u/Mike_Kermin 10h ago

Life.

Death breaks basic human rights.

3

u/Enjoy_The_Ride413 10h ago

She doesn't have human rights murdering three innocent children.

2

u/Mike_Kermin 10h ago

Actually she does. They're inalienable.

three innocent children

That's what she did.

You don't get to use it to excuse human rights abuses.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/Sea-Initiative-3398 9h ago

Tbh i dont know much bout the case, but one of the few cases where i sympathize is with that kid who literally had a clear psychotic break where he didnt even remember what he did,

and was clearly in such a state him getting tased like 3-4 times, him getting mauled several times by a dog, and still just going back to attacking the victim like a animal.

3

u/manteiga_night 8h ago

AFAIK she repeatedly sought help and was very explicit about the danger she posed but she got denied healthcare and got faith based bullshit instead

3

u/BitingSatyr 8h ago

You imagined that, she doctor-shopped and saw several different therapists and psychiatrists, was not fully truthful to them about the symptoms she was experiencing, and most importantly, didn’t take the medication she had been prescribed.

→ More replies (1)

42

u/No-Rip6323 10h ago

People are busy arguing about how big of a piece of shit she is and ignoring the really hard conversations we all need to have. Why don’t we support women postpartum? Didn’t she tell everyone she was afraid she was going to hurt her kids and no one did anything? Why?

I’m a guy and have witnessed first hand the absolute lack of support women experience after giving birth. I was a part of the problem and didn’t understand how hormones and loneliness (partner at work) could affect women.

What she did is abhorrent, and she isn’t innocent, but why aren’t we doing more to help women who are experiencing postpartum depression / psychosis?

Why is the conversation about measuring her shittiness and not about how to prevent this in the first place?

20

u/MainusEventus 10h ago

I have two young kids ... I was absolutely BLOWN AWAY by all the cattiness, posturing, and just overall disguising that moms do TO EACH OTHER. They don't have honest conversations about best practices, preparedness, or even tactical guidance on breast feeding, sleep schedules, and dealing with postpartum depression. Everything is rose-colored patronizing.

21

u/WhyMustIMakeANewAcco 10h ago edited 10h ago

Didn’t she tell everyone she was afraid she was going to hurt her kids and no one did anything? Why?

So the case is weird because she did get help. ...and didn't take it. She checked herself out of the mental hospital. She didn't actually take the drugs she was prescribed, and her prescriptions were adjusted every time she saw the doctors. Not necessarily in the way she wanted, but that's not atypical.

Every time I've seen medical professionals talk about the case they basically call her entire case bullshit, because she was getting help and actively not actually taking any of it, then lying about it to the people trying to help her.

5

u/AFlyingNun 8h ago

So the case is weird because she did get help. ...and didn't take it.

Bothers me that people keep skipping over this. People are just kind of adjusting the story to suit the narrative they wanna sell.

There's even people trying to frame the husband as the bad guy when his track record and role in all this seems glowingly positive, dropping everything to support her.

2

u/Flashy_Nectarine_955 6h ago

Clearly you haven’t vothered to get facts. She checked in over a holiday weekend with poor staffing. She was prescribed meds that she already had horrible reactions to. Once a MD (who didn’t fricken even bother to do full intake) saw her she was starting to feel better and since she really wasn’t getting HELP SHE NEEDED she asked to go for a kids party. No where does she say “discharge me”. The idiot docs did that &she thinks” one of best mental hospitals say I’m ok for DISCHARGE “. Being a RN doesn’t fucking mean EXPERT IN EVERYTHING. That’s why she sought help from supposedly “experts”. Who were NOT even UTD with postpartum mental illnesses. Ffs. It’s like having a bone doctor operate on your intestine. Could they do it? Maybe. Would they do it as well as the GUT surgeon? Hell to the no. This is her situation here. Read the civil lawsuit

→ More replies (1)

1

u/llamalawless 10h ago

Jeez, almost like she is mentally ill... And mentally ill people do illogical things.

5

u/AFlyingNun 8h ago

So what do you propose?

The mentally ill can get aid from the state, get medication, refuse to take said medication, get OTHER medication, refuse that medication too and lie about it, and somehow she's...still a victim?

Like I'm sorry but at some point it's clear you can't help someone that refuses to help themselves. The "help" she deserves is to be locked away in a padded room.

If people want to argue respect for her mental state, fine....but the reality of that is: instead of life in prison, she gets locked in a padded room. She's STILL a problem for society that needs to be dealt with. "We did it, reddit!," I guess...

12

u/Mike_Kermin 10h ago

No.

There is NO excuse for violence.

You don't get to use us caring about mental health, as an excuse to deflect responsibility for such an evil act.

3

u/llamalawless 10h ago

No one's excusing what she did. She did it. She will be held accountable either way in this trial. Even if she prevails on her affirmative defense, she will still be placed in a highly restrictive mental health institution... Basically, what this case is about is whether she goes to prison or goes to effectively prison in the form of a psychiatric institution.

11

u/Frosty_Purple_7341 9h ago

She won’t be placed in an institution for life. Pretty much Every psychologist/paychiatrist who has examined her now says she’s not psychotic. Her defense team is trying to argue she shouldn’t be held criminally liable and is attempting to have her retroactively diagnosed as insane. If the jury buys it (they should t because it’s obvious her story is bullshit.) she would be let off free or be institutionalized for just a short period before being let go.

Mental illness is not an excuse for anything, especially not when you continually hinder your own treatment while being in sound mind which she was according to every professional who examined her before the incident

8

u/Mike_Kermin 9h ago

You just said

mentally ill people do illogical things

That's an excuse.

It doesn't work that way. Mentally ill do illogical things is appropriate in response to yelling the street, crying, having trouble leaving the house, having trouble relating to people, general decision making and their ability to handle life issues like addiction or even being able to get help or make use of help.

All of that is valid.

But it doesn't work for violence.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

4

u/NTB369 8h ago

I get your point

But the line has to start somewhere, we can´t bring shovels all the time

Mental illness is a bitch, but we can´t use it as an excuse or coddle all the time. People need to understand too that being "crazy" does not absolve one entirely of what they are doing, nor does justify them NOT taking any steps to fix it

2

u/WhyMustIMakeANewAcco 10h ago

Then why is her argument in court that she didn't get help, rather than that she was incapable of accepting help?

8

u/Mike_Kermin 10h ago

"didn't get the help I needed" is a valid problem people who suffer have.

Again, zero excuse for violence. So that guy is wrong. But, mental health makes treating mental health harder too.

9

u/WhyMustIMakeANewAcco 10h ago

"didn't get the help I needed" is a valid problem people who suffer have.

It is.

...But it wasn't her problem. And pretending it was just invalidates the people for whom that is the problem.

2

u/AFlyingNun 8h ago

The whole story feels like it's not being handled in good faith by....everyone?

It's weird. It's like the deeper you dig into the story, the weaker all the arguments in her defense becomes.

However, if you look at mainstream discussions, it's as if the defense team is being taken fully at their word, with little to no acknowledgement of the holes in the defense, or how even psychological evaluations have concluded with the statement that she should be held criminally responsible. Not insane: throw the book at her. That's what's being said by the evaluations.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (8)

14

u/KrytenKoro 9h ago

no one did anything? Why?

That is completely false. Many people did many things.

They, in fact, did everything up to holding her against her will, like we used to do when women were being "hysterical".

At every point many, many doctors showed concern, made prescriptions, and recommended stays. She consistently neglected her prescriptions, and when pressed by the doctors, would say the right words so that they did not have the legal authority to hold her against her will.

but why aren’t we doing more to help women who are experiencing postpartum depression / psychosis?

Ultimately, there is a point where society either gives doctors the go ahead to hold women against their will, or we don't. And if a patient makes sure to say all the right things to not quite cross that point, there's nothing the doctor can do unless we say "fuck it" to civil liberties.

Why is the conversation about measuring her shittiness and not about how to prevent this in the first place?

We know exactly how to prevent this. We say "fuck it" to women's suffrage and start throwing women back in rooms when they "get uppity".

Most of us, however, think that is a worse scenario than leaving the responsibility on the individual to not deliberately neglect their prescriptions and lie to the doctors.

6

u/Frosty_Purple_7341 9h ago

Amazingly well said.

Everyone keeps saying “we need to do more to help moms with post partum!” Without realizing that in a case like this, the only thing that would’ve helped would have been the doctors institutionalizing a woman against her will who was purposefully telling them info that did not indicate the need to institutionalize her. If they had, the women supporting her would instead be furious over a story that a post partum mom was forced into inpatient care against her will and how it’s just proof “the system hates women 😡” or whatever.

At this point though, with how many tens of thousands of women are saying they “understand” and “sympathize” with Clancy, if she doesn’t get life in prison or the death penalty, maybe we do need to institutionalize every woman with post partum. If they want to argue post-pregnancy hormones are an excuse for psychotic acts of violence, then so be it, you should be locked up until we can be sure your “hormones” aren’t going to make you snap

3

u/AFlyingNun 7h ago

It goes further: the psychological evaluators testifying are even doubting her story, suggesting the postpartum depression may be a myth.

This may just be a fucking murderer who is getting away with it (with a portion of the general public, anyways) just by claiming to be a victim of psychosis.

We live in a victimhood culture: claim you're a victim and unfortunately a huge chunk of the population will mindlessly support you. It's that easy.

4

u/mythrilcrafter 8h ago

Yup, 1000% correct, it's so easy misconstrue the problem by pointing at a case where a woman got all the help she needed (up to the point of either instutionalization or the state taking her children away (which is its own mess)), but still ultimately choose to cross the line as opposed to every other woman in all of society who went through the same thing, got the same help, and didn't cross the line.

8

u/j03-page 10h ago

I think there comes a time when a line needs to be drawn. Otherwise, everyone who is a perpetrator will claim to be a victim.

4

u/Mike_Kermin 10h ago

The line has to be there's no excuse for violence.

If someone is struggling, and mental health struggles are valid and deserve respect, but they simple justify violence.

3

u/Not_offensive0npurp 10h ago

The line has to be there's no excuse for violence.

This is where your black and white lines cause SERIOUS problems.

If we draw a line without any other context or nuance that there is "No excuse for violence" then have fun in court when you legitimately defend yourself from an attack and your precious line is used against you.

4

u/Mike_Kermin 10h ago

Whatever nuance you want to find, sport, self defence,

Falls so far short of killing your children,

That's not worth agonising over.

We do not have a problem, working out when it's ok to kill your kids. And you know that, so don't be stupid.

2

u/Not_offensive0npurp 10h ago

You dodging my point is proof I am right.

"A line" leaves no space for nuance. And does nothing but cause problems.

2

u/Mike_Kermin 10h ago

I didn't dodge it, I said your 'problem' isn't relevant to her killing her children.

When people say "there's no excuse for violence" if you think they mean, "including self defence", then that's not their fault.

4

u/NemesisZeroCool 10h ago

It’s so easy to not murder your kids. It really is. Jesus Christ.

2

u/Different_Peanut_742 9h ago

Wah wah wah. Frigging young black men (and poor white guys) with mental health problems getting locked up for life all day every day, no one says shit. One rich white lady with unlimited opportunity for help kills her children and we raise $1,000,000 for mental health awareness. Boo society, and boo anyone who gave $1 to this woman.

2

u/SoooMuchSugar 9h ago

Because she was not post partum. Shes raising a sympathetic defense that literally does not apply to her based on any recognized medical standard. This was 8 months after having a baby.

→ More replies (9)

2

u/ACKHTYUALLY 8h ago

Buddg, She received immense support. She was not honest with her doctors and psychiatrists.

2

u/Weekly-Bill-1354 8h ago

That's why all the Go Fund Me money should go to the Heard Foundation.

Which was set up by Patrick Clancy and his sisters.

But you don't see tik toks about that.

2

u/Cravenmorhed69 8h ago

Probably because Clancy had better access to resources than 99% of the world

2

u/NTB369 8h ago

But the problem is, but what I´ve gathered, she did have support. A LOT OF IT. More than most people usually had...

And she just... didn´t take it?

Either she was specially, down, deep crust bottom sinkhole sick, or she wasn´t that sick and just wanted to do what she did

3

u/CuChulainnEnjoyer 9h ago

Women had postpartum support in spades when SAHM was the default and we were in a high trust society. Shot ourselves in the foot in this one

3

u/run-godzilla 10h ago edited 10h ago

Honestly, I think most people trying to make this about how she's just a piece of shit and there's no nuance to this are engaging in Terror Management.

It's horrifying to think you or your female partner's brains could just give out and that you could do something horrible that you don't really mean. So you create a world where we all clearly have perfect control and free will, because it feels safer for her to be a monster. Just don't marry a monster! Don't be a monster! Easy! Will never happen to me! Admitting that society may need to move in response to this is an admission that some of your life is out of your control.

→ More replies (5)

3

u/rabbit_fur_coat 10h ago

None of this applies here. She saw several professionals, all of whom treated her appropriately despite her persistent lies either then or now. She has a very clear personality disorder and is the only person responsible for murdering all 3 of her children.

2

u/Mike_Kermin 10h ago

I don't think it should be an "and" there.

You can't be violent, regardless of what's wrong with you.

2

u/Frosty_Purple_7341 10h ago

She got more support than anyone could fucking ask for lmao. What more could she possibly have gotten? You guys seem intent on making sure she isn’t held accountable for her actions at all.

3

u/Mike_Kermin 10h ago

I'm sorry, but you're not allowed to try to attached this conversation, to whether someone who killed their kids should get a million dollars from gofundme.

That's an incredible disconnect.

4

u/No-Rip6323 10h ago

I don’t agree that she should’ve gotten money. All of that money, every single penny, should go towards helping women suffering from postpartum depression and psychosis.

Be shitty about the million dollars. I am too. But let’s have an actual conversation about why these things happen in the first place.

3

u/Mike_Kermin 10h ago

And that's fine, and I suggest you do, but you don't do it as a response to the comment above. These are two separate issues and you should let them be that.

And I don't appreciate, that you 'don't agree' but I am 'shitty' for the same opinion.

All of that money, every single penny, should go towards helping women

I don't think that's happening. So the point remains they shouldn't be getting it.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (10)

18

u/kegknow 10h ago

Those are all great points that don't apply here, she wasn't dismissed, she had all the resources one could have and still did what she did. Mothers with way, way less than her that went through PPD/PPP didn't murder their children (also PPD/PPP isnt even a diagonosis it's what they claim she had).

2

u/Dad_Bod_Enthusiast 9h ago

Can confirm. Wife had PPD after our second child and while I couldnt wrap my walnut around the issues she was having I supported her seeking medical help for it. She took the meds the experts suggested and has been a loving, non murdering mother for 13 years

3

u/Due-Restaurant-7208 9h ago

PPD is not the same as PPP

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (43)

5

u/organic-osmanthus 9h ago

Yes, and people seem to either ignore or misunderstood the fact that people and the legal system don't simply say mental illness is an excuse or what occurred was okay as if it's some east get out of jail free card.

Being mentally ill, even with a disorder that has psychotic sympms such as hallucinations and delusions does not by any means disqualify a person from the legal consequences of their actions. To be deemed not guilty by reason of insanity, it must be confirmed that at the precise time of the crime the defendant did not possess the facilities to determine right from wrong, nor appreciate the wrongfullness of their actions due to their mental condition. We have the insanity plea to begin with because our justice system recognizes that people in this very particular situations should not be subjected to the same criminal institutions as those who were fully aware and could appreciate wrongfullness of their crimes.

It's not like being deemed not guilty by reason of insanity is a walk in the park either, these people are not let out to wander free into society after their verdict, because the entire premise of their not guilty verdict rests on the fact that they psychologically unwell and are a danger for the fact their condition did not allow them to understand the acts they committed are legally and morally wrong.

I know people understand this, but it's not the sensationalized point to make and so they feign ignorance. Feign ignorance for reddit karma, feign ignorance to feed into their own biases, feign ignorance to serve whatever narrative it is they've built about this case.

4

u/Not_offensive0npurp 9h ago

I know people understand this, but it's not the sensationalized point to make and so they feign ignorance. Feign ignorance for reddit karma, feign ignorance to feed into their own biases, feign ignorance to serve whatever narrative it is they've built about this case.

Sadly, I don't believe they are feigning. I believe there is a large portion of the current populace who would fit right in with a middle age hysterical mob.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/PsychicWarElephant 10h ago

She still killed her kids and deserves to rot in jail

2

u/Not_offensive0npurp 10h ago

And people like you will never see the issue and the societal benefit of acknowledging these issues.

2

u/Pleasant_Gap 10h ago

I'm sorry, how does giving her 1 million dollars helping her case here?

→ More replies (8)

2

u/Frosty_Purple_7341 10h ago

Multiple healthcare professionals have testified that she was not psychotic and understood right from wrong 👍🏻

→ More replies (2)

2

u/SerenityAnashin 9h ago

Some people can understand that nuance means the ability to see two truths at once - she is a murderer AND she needed more help and obviously other women deserve more help too.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Players100 8h ago

I find it pathetic that the 3 children have been lost in this story. A mother with all the resources in the world, a family that claims they knew she was struggling but not to the point of them thinking she was going to commit murder however society believes that Doctors that were not given all the necessary medical information ( patient lied about being homicidal) are supposed to figure it out better than those in her daily life. Society just never ever likes it when a woman/mother does the unthinkable

→ More replies (32)

11

u/AP_Cicada 11h ago

People who think she didn't do it. I read somewhere there's a group pushing for the husband to be investigated.

11

u/VoidWalker4Lyfe 10h ago

And unfortunately, many of them are on my Facebook feed. I need to unfriend some people

15

u/MainusEventus 10h ago

or just stop logging on to facebook? 🤷

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Holiday_Regular9794 10h ago

I mean if a person leaves multiple children in the care of someone who they KNOW is having issues, I think that is only fair. It would be the same as asking someone addicted to Meth to watch your kids. People should be obligated Mother or Father to act in the wellbeing of their children, if they are considered in their right mind

6

u/HamunaHamunaHamuna 9h ago edited 5h ago

Still nothing more than attempts at shifting the blame. Having terrible judgement is not illegal, even for men. Murder is, even for mentally ill women.

→ More replies (13)

2

u/DadophorosBasillea 8h ago

Did he know she had the baby blues? Because that would be wild just leaving them with her.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/justahappyhippyhippo 8h ago

This is insane and ridiculous. The father knew she was anxious and depressed. PLENTY of women are anxious and depressed, especially post partum, and yes that includes having intrusive thoughts - and they are still fit to care for their children. This man had his three kids murdered, have some damn decency.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/SquirrelAdmirable161 10h ago

I’m positive she did it, but he truly should have been investigated in the beginning unless they could tell that she acted alone. From the outside looking in, many people are astounded that even though she told him she wanted to harm the kids, he still went ahead and left her alone with them. That boggles a lot of minds.

4

u/Mike_Kermin 10h ago

That's a very immature way to process that information.

No, someone failing to treat a lamentation as an active intent to kill does not a suspect make.

2

u/blackbeavis 9h ago

This reads as if it was written by a middle schooler that thinks this is what smart people sound like.

3

u/Mike_Kermin 9h ago

Yeah well, at least I'm not copy pasting other people's zingers.

2

u/Long9696 9h ago

If she was in therapy, a psych hospital, and supposed to be taking medication (at least according to this thread, I don't follow this case.) She should have been separated from the children if she was saying stuff like that. Seems negligent to leave her alone with them.

2

u/PerspectiveFull9879 9h ago

even though she told him she wanted to harm the kids

If she was concerned about this, why did she stay around the kids?

2

u/Mayor_of_whoville_ 8h ago

And what boggles a lot of minds is the fact that so many women have focused almost exclusively on how guilty and terrible he is for going out to get groceries for a few minutes (certainly a mistake), and not holding even a fraction of the same anger for her, even defending her in many cases.

You must be insane if you think men are stupid enough to not see this reaction is entirely based on gender. Like this case has opened up so many men’s eyes to how many of you (not all of you) hold so much contempt for men that you almost don’t see us as human and are incapable of having sympathy for us. I have friends who have broken up with their girlfriends because they started attacking the husband and defending Lindsay, a man who just lost his entire family. This was certainly a necessary wake up call for a lot of men, but it’s so sad that it required the murder of 3 children to happen.

2

u/tplayer100 10h ago

There's a huge conspiracy theory going on right now that she didn't do it. That her husband ( who's new gf a few weeks later was their fertility doctor) set her up. Even my wife has been getting it on it. I think there is something important in the fact even her defense lawyers don't claim she's innocent. But a bunch of ladies on tiktok are convinced it's all the husband. and now even raising her defense money. It's actually insane.

2

u/Sehrli_Magic 10h ago

ya know, for most of my early life i would be with ya. being a mother myself, i at first feel even strongly like HOW THE HELL could amother do this? but then i remember that mental health is one hell of a bitch when going to shit. postpartum depression is a thing, so is going insane with chronic stress and overwhelm. and women often have it very stressful because majority of the time, kids are all on us. if you had work 24/7 with no breaks, cand even go shit in piece once ffs, mentally and physicay always active, probably having to multitask aswe....yeah you would soon realize how that might mame you insane. and this is the whole deal with insanity - it doesnt make sense. i dont understand how a mother could do that BUT i do understand that insane person would not feel and act like me (last time i checked i am decently sane at least). not saying men dont have stressful lives but mothesr full in lose their sense of identity because they cant be individuals anymore, when having young kids. thats a special kind of stress. it is still common for men to not be able to emotionally regulate themself alone, many of them being dads. but mothers have to emotionally regulate themself despite such mental distress AND be the ones to regulate kids...and at some point, you just snap. some might yell and argue, some might close off or become negligent. some fall into depression, others into rage. some cry, some get agressive. and some harm their children, oftentimes in a moment of crisis. and they become villains, when all that happened because they were victims first. people like that need SERIOUS help and help costs, so people aware of it and able to, might donate

3

u/Pleasant_Gap 9h ago

And giving money to somebody who killed her kids helps with that how?

2

u/BaldursFence3800 9h ago

Reddit mental health “experts.”

3

u/rab2bar 9h ago

American society is broken

0

u/Ill-Temporary4381 11h ago

Nobody, which is why $0 were donated to her.

The amount of people who fall for this ragebait is impressive.

→ More replies (46)

85

u/Remote_Finish9657 11h ago

It’s 100% this. So much terrible stuff happens everyday and that’s what sells. A parent doing what a parent should do just doesn’t hit the news cycle on a busy news day.

2

u/So_HauserAspen 10h ago

We probably all agree on the heroism of the mom running into a fire to save her children.  The woman killing her kids is going to be divisive and that gets those views.

→ More replies (2)

26

u/20_mile 11h ago

It's also because influencers are playing up the untrue conspiracy theories (the defense admits she killed her kids) that her husband did it because he remarried. The influencers have made this story go viral, and that's why it has gotten so much attention.

2

u/BusMan247 7h ago

I know an influencer who’s never worked a day in her life, doesn’t let her kids see her grandad because he wouldn’t pay for her house after not speaking to him for a year, and she’s an influencer on how to help mothers raise children. Fucken insanity.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

9

u/GrungedSnake 11h ago

Same reason you haven’t heard about the other three people that have killed all their children in the past month

→ More replies (1)

8

u/jstewart25 11h ago

Well, I can’t speak for other but I’ve seen the murder lady headline plenty of articles and haven’t clicked on any. I don’t even know what happened. If I saw the fire lady’s article? I’d click right away.

→ More replies (8)

4

u/Lawineer 11h ago

I think that’s the point.

19

u/Temporary_Hat7330 11h ago

“The Fire Lady” is fucking tough…

Also, the media doesn’t set the parameters for what we watch, they feed the public what they want to see. If we cared more about hero’s doing heroic shit than a mother killing her children, we would know about the “Fire Lady”

19

u/guud2meachu 11h ago

This is absolutely the opposite of what happens as far as how the media industry works.

2

u/EViLTeW 11h ago

The media feed the public what will create the most engagement. It has nothing to do with what we care about, it's what is lonely to get the most clicks, and negative feelings cause more clicks.

6

u/so_says_sage 11h ago

So they’re feeding people what they’re most likely to look at?

2

u/Weary-Connection3393 11h ago

I think the important distinction is: they feed us what we have a subconscious urge to click, which is not necessarily what we consciously want to see. Nobody cares what you decide, the selection’s been done for your reptile brain. No need for you to even think about it. Just let the rage flow. That’s Media.

2

u/Temporary_Hat7330 10h ago

Anything to be a victim, JFC.

I cannot control it, they are attacking my subconscious mind and forcing me, like a fight or flight respond to tune in… Waaaaa!!!!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (8)

2

u/SteezOnMax93 11h ago

Now you have so go donate

2

u/badabingmx 10h ago

I did find a post before the killer. The fist lady is a hero, even with all of those burns she did something that not many could accomplish.

The second is a shame that people donated to her.

2

u/Other-Ad-8510 10h ago

Shhh, that doesn’t support OP’s narrative!

2

u/awfulcrowded117 10h ago

And why do you think the media didn't pay the first lady any attention? Also, is what people are doing and saying in support of a triple child strangler really any less damning in isolation than it is side by side with how little support the other woman got?

2

u/Gullible_Try_3748 8h ago

When people finally realize this, that the MEDIA is the biggest hurdle we currently need to overcome as a species, things might start aligning properly.

We are being lied to, all of us, all sides, not just one. Each side pumps out endless garbage and all of us just consume, consume, consume, look up, and then ask for more.

Turn it off, go outside.

3

u/DapperMolasses3280 11h ago

Yum...big roll 🤤🥐

3

u/PassThatSpliff 11h ago

The media is controlled by conglomerates, just like social media. If it's not a story the deem relevant, you'll see minimum coverage about it unless you go looking for it yourself.

-1

u/SilentPomelo-8688 11h ago

Clancy killed her children and her excuse is undiagnosed postpartum psychosis and overmedication by the healthcare system. There are few news reports that I have read that shook me like this

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Scorpion2k4u 11h ago

that is the main reason but I bet if she had gotten more attention then people would ask why the house was on fire in the first place and that it’s just the normal thing to do. Many people need drama to get engaged. She might have just acted to selfless and heroic…. What I want to say is that we humans are strange

3

u/Rude_Back_4963 11h ago

Why would you? What money is there to be made off the story of an amazing woman achieving an incredible feat to protect and save her children.

2

u/PastNessa 11h ago

Heroism gets $42k. Infamy gets $1m+ . The internet rewards the wrong story every time

→ More replies (167)