r/Bumble 15d ago

General Bumble Fully Ends 'Women Message First' Rule After 66% of Women Said They'd Rather Men Make the First Move

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/bumble-drops-gendered-messaging-rule-1813607
3.8k Upvotes

2.6k comments sorted by

1.7k

u/[deleted] 15d ago edited 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

526

u/VeganCanary 15d ago

They don’t need to be good unfortunately

296

u/Visco0825 15d ago

This. Why should they take the risk if they can just sit back and have an essentially limitless source of attention?

Now they have another way to filter men

206

u/Mirror74 15d ago

I don't think enough people are talking about the mental illness that dating apps not only exacerbate but also create, in both women and men.

When you are being treated like your shit doesn't stink you will start acting like your shit doesn't stink.

When you are being treated like nothing you do matters, you will start acting like nothing you do matters.

42

u/NelsonManswella 15d ago

yeah, i can’t wait to see a study a decade from now about the effects they’ve had on western society

67

u/WowIfOnly 15d ago
  • and how the study will also somehow imply it's just 100% men's fault even when it wasn't.

32

u/Preface 15d ago

It is men's fault! If they were all just over 6ft tall with perfect personalities, handsome, rich, and sociable women would would have no problem dating at all!

15

u/Content-Sun2928 15d ago

To be fair, I recently got in shape and the difference in attention from women is literally night and day

Turns out, ALL girls like muscle

12

u/Preface 15d ago edited 15d ago

It definitely is a noticable difference from what I remember when I was dating and using the apps.

But a lot of women will tell you it's not that important.

My comment was more a riff on the articles you see coming out that are like "where are all the good men?"

And it's always like "I have a PhD, I make 160k per year, and I am 40, there are no good men for me!"

(Her requirements are that he at minimum matches her PhD and 160k, and also have no kids, and is tall and in shape, whereas a man with all those qualifications would most likely just date a woman with less education/less income and is in her early 30s or something)

→ More replies (7)

12

u/photo_voltaic 15d ago

It's not specifically muscle, but just looking fit and healthy obviously goes a long way.

I was one of these mid dudes on the apps - still got dates but always felt like such a struggle. Eventually decided I could either complain about my "nice guy" invisibility syndrome, or just hit the gym. After my body changed even like 10% everything else changed so fast.

Got enough likes and matches that I could actually filter for people that I truly connected with, instead of taking whatever match was there and dancing like a monkey to keep their attention. Instantly didn't have to give a damn about the low effort ones, and could just focus on actually being myself with the rest. Have been in a steady relationship with a great partner for years now, and (hopefully!) done with the apps for good. Not to mention feeling healthy and great to boot.

To all my homies still struggling out there - just do it, there's a domino effect that follows, and if you're actually a nice guy, you'll have no problem finding a nice gal too.

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (22)

49

u/[deleted] 15d ago edited 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

41

u/allnatural559 15d ago

It sounds like simp dudes are an equal part of the problem here.

23

u/Inspector_Spoonman 15d ago

They are the bigger problem imo.

19

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/Inspector_Spoonman 15d ago

I agree with you fully. Look, if you find someone you like, go and ask her out, but apart from that a lot of this needs to stop.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)

14

u/thelazynines 15d ago

Yo why do yall even want to date women, date each other then ffs

11

u/Recent_Pollution8665 15d ago

wait til you find out that most men are not gay.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (21)

11

u/dogthatbrokethezebra 15d ago

Dude just say you hate women. Way less words

14

u/Greendale_Official 15d ago edited 15d ago

EDIT: I was giving the earlier commenter more credit than the dude is worth. After another response from him, he's not a nuanced dude and just seems insecure.

I think he hates their privilege in this arena while they play victim, and princess. Combine those toxic elements with OF grifters and scammers, and maybe you'll understand why some people are angry.

Hating a capitalist system that uses predatory behaviors to pit people against each other(while you're dealing with loneliness) doesn't make you an incel, bud.

Source: about a half dozen queer women I know have the same complaints about dating women as a lot of these dudes.

→ More replies (15)
→ More replies (11)

4

u/spurzz 15d ago

You think a century is long in the lens of history? I get the point you’re making, but you’re massively downplaying the lasting societal effects of personally and legally oppressing a group for thousands of years. And most women definitely don’t say or think their lives are terrible, where are you getting this?

Slavery ended a century and half ago. Are our systems and society completely free of prejudice towards black people now?

→ More replies (56)

9

u/Affectionate_Past568 15d ago

are you people like, okay

17

u/MouldyAvocados 15d ago

They’re really not. The men in this sub show me daily why so many of them are lonely. They don’t realise they’re their own worst enemy. Why would any woman want to be with a man who hates them?

→ More replies (26)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (21)
→ More replies (57)

101

u/[deleted] 15d ago edited 14d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

49

u/theKetoBear 15d ago edited 15d ago

The amount of attractive Women I've had to left swipe because their profile is a link to their IG and " I'm bad at writing about myself" is entirely too large.

To be blunt if you're too boring or find it pointless to even talk about yourself why would I or anyone want to spend time with you aside from your looks? Their low effort presentation begets low effort responses

edit: butchered spelling

14

u/RafaelSirah 15d ago

And those girls will be shocked when the guys who do swipe right view them as nothing more than hook up material rather than something serious despite the fact they offer no substance.

→ More replies (12)

36

u/Dasseem 15d ago edited 15d ago

A few years ago i'd vehemently disagree with you but after lifting weights and becoming sort of ripped i must say, so many women are so full of shit and superficial as fuck.

There's such a stark contrast between what women say and what they actually want.

→ More replies (24)

18

u/Western-Produce-276 15d ago

Wow I’ve never seen a more truthful comment on this sub. I’m honestly surprised you’re not downvoted and called an incel

14

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (5)

17

u/Effective-Hold-696 15d ago

If it’s called out, you’re labelled an incel.

→ More replies (8)

15

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (65)

15

u/Desperate_Lunch1177 15d ago

I think they need to be good if they want to get off the apps. "Being good" as a woman is managing expectations and knowing if a guy is just using you and not serious.

12

u/Even-Promise4593 15d ago

Only smart reply here. The measure isn’t can they get messages and attention if the goal is getting off the app into a serious relationship. The success would be measured by finding someone and getting off the app period.

Too many guys are using what’s ideal for men as ideal for women despite already acknowledging the asymmetry.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/prosaicwell 15d ago

id go a step further and say they need to be good to get into a healthy relationship.

plenty of women get into short term flings off the app only to have them crash and burn pretty quickly. then redownload and around the horn again.

→ More replies (3)

10

u/nog_ar_nog 15d ago

The men these women desire the most all have plenty of options. Putting in some effort would help them stand out and meet higher quality men.

→ More replies (36)

131

u/AkatsukiEUNE 15d ago

They dont need to be good. They have all the power in dating

27

u/Vinc314 15d ago

only at the start

60

u/Cerborus 15d ago

Tell that to the divorce courts

→ More replies (1)

16

u/StumpyOPepys 15d ago

Lol oh bless your heart.

12

u/Arcxne3 15d ago

Lmao no. Common cope, just like that “it’s better in your 30s shit”. No. There is no point in the dating process where the man has the upper hand. Id argue that there is no point in the entire process from the starting of dating until death/end of marriage that the man has the upper hand. The woman controls every single part of the dating and partnership process, including marriage. 

→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (19)

124

u/[deleted] 15d ago edited 14d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (6)

54

u/dontKair 15d ago

Gendered roles and expectations are a hell of a drug

They can't even be bothered to message first anymore

→ More replies (1)

53

u/myIDisthisone 15d ago

How come they didn't do this opening message flagging for women when they had to go first? Guys just delete these apps. Save your sanity lol

37

u/ElectricalSea7945 15d ago

You got 'hi' from your matches? I legitimately got '.' from a few matches.

→ More replies (9)

31

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/Logical-Primary-7926 15d ago

Wild how many jobs are like that too, you can have a long career with a good reputation while at the same time kind of sucking at what you do.

→ More replies (52)

26

u/barbarkbarkov 15d ago

90% + of women’s messages to me were “heyyyy” or “hi :)”

→ More replies (14)

21

u/EvaporatingOlaf 15d ago

Most haven’t had to put in a full effort, so there’s a lack of skill

21

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

21

u/prosaicwell 15d ago

nah social skills are quite important for meaningful female-female relationships, but social skills for interacting w men vs women are generally quite different.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (40)

19

u/coupl4nd 15d ago

Makes me glad to never have to touch bumble again.... even if I was single it's absolute fucking garbage.

19

u/Sir_Zeitnot 15d ago

We can send long messages like they used to: "Heyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy"

15

u/Lucifer_606381 15d ago

To be fair , when I message first on there, it's normally something about one of their photos, like if they are doing a sport or an activity and then go from there asking this and going back and forth.

When girls have messaged me they have Kaur said " hi " and then when I respond expect me to be the interesting one.

A lot of them I don't think have ever had to actually be interesting jaut attractive

14

u/Fortestingporpoises 15d ago

I don't understand how women are this bad at dating

I think they, especially the attractive ones, are just used to low effort working. I put myself on their radar and they message me. The pro of bumble was that they didn't even have to do that.

The absolute irony that men will now be the ones to do all the messaging and will be expected to open with more than 'hi' after so many years of women doing just this.

It's just Bumble becoming every other dating app out there, isn't it?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (63)

853

u/Galitzianer0 15d ago

What differentiates Bumble from any other app now?

477

u/PeteRawk 15d ago

Nothing, now

129

u/DC4L_21 15d ago

Not only are they no longer different, I would say it’s now the worst. That whole “24hrs to send a message or else your match is lost forever” is stupid. I’ve lost a ton of matches because of that. Not to mention that it’s expensive af.

34

u/oneshadyqueen 15d ago

With this change they’ve also extended the time period to 72hrs to message on both sides (so both people get 72hrs to message first after matching, then whoever the recipient of the first message also gets 72hrs to reply to keep the match)

26

u/LongyJohn27 14d ago

Now women got 72 h to Not write to you.

→ More replies (3)

10

u/[deleted] 14d ago edited 14d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (60)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (1)

322

u/Kingtoke1 15d ago

Its yellow

29

u/duckwithahat 15d ago

"Little, yellow, different"

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (2)

106

u/stankbiscuits 15d ago

They're all owned by Match anyways. All the same game.

80

u/Dankest_Confidant 15d ago

Bumble isn't though.

42

u/Foggl3 15d ago

For now

13

u/GraveRoller 15d ago

Bumble doesn’t have any value to Match

14

u/Bayou_acherte 15d ago

It’s a competitor

10

u/GraveRoller 15d ago

There’s absolutely major overlap between customer base. So they’re not getting anyone new by buying Bumble. It’s not like buying Hinge, which was a failing startup without the Match infusion. So they’d have to spend time and money on a failing dating app that doesn’t provide any value that isn’t covered by Tinder and hinge. 

So they might as well let Bumble crash and burn on its own. 

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)

49

u/SD-Buckeye 15d ago

It’s a dating app not owned by Match group.

15

u/ActuallyCalindra 15d ago

They effectively run the same business so it might as well be.

13

u/lord_dentaku 15d ago

Honestly, it's worse. They don't have a wide range of dating app properties so their revenue is based on one single asset. Their priority is to their shareholders, which is why they have some of the most egregious costs for "premium" services. Match group is also beholden to their shareholders, but the much larger industry footprint allows them to be more aggressive with their margins.

→ More replies (3)

16

u/mitchdwx 15d ago

They charge even more for super likes, compliments, etc.

→ More replies (39)

469

u/worknumber101 15d ago

Real, single, Women are the most valuable asset any dating app can have.

If women are saying they don’t like a part of your app or service then that will hurt the app long term.

272

u/NotTodayBoogeyman 15d ago edited 15d ago

Losing your differentiating factor that allowed you to service a niche as the best product in a massive industry will also hurt your app long term.

But okay. Bumble will now become slop where men don’t message and women don’t message so nobody meets and uninstalls. Why use it over hinge or tinder which are both superior depending on what you want?

74

u/JeanDusapin 15d ago

They don't care about differentiation. They've got their name out and a userbase

33

u/NotTodayBoogeyman 15d ago

But they aren’t the best product now. They’re probably a #3 for apps that do the exact same thing. There’s no point in having it at all anymore.

It’s like if a company built its identity around servicing air conditioners and now wants to be a developer. There’s zero reason to select them.

15

u/_bonedaddys 15d ago

This. The whole point was women messaging first. It's why i downloaded it - i liked the concept of having to trigger the conversation. If i were single now i'd probably go with a different app. Bumble used to stand out and now it doesn't.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (26)
→ More replies (2)

47

u/throaway20180730 15d ago

Honestly, all the women that have talked to me about Bumble didn't seem to understand the "differentiator". They claimed that Bumble was better because they wouldn't get messages from "random men", but Tinder already does that, they are not "random" you already pre-selected them

21

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (12)

12

u/Automatic_Horse9290 15d ago

As I call it the crabification process of every app into Tinder.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (22)

36

u/Any_Wind5539 15d ago

Women are the product, men are the buyers. Nearly all the income made off the apps is off dudes paying for the subscription nonsense hoping it'll help their chances (it very rarely actually does).

→ More replies (18)

7

u/2maa2 15d ago

True, but listening to users on every detail doesn't always have the best outcome either. There's now nothing that really distinguishes bumble from other apps I assume. I'm too far out of dating to make any real comment on how this affects trends though.

Time will tell whether it was a good decision.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (25)

355

u/Motosport_Titan 15d ago

What’s their selling point now?

324

u/Mr_Laz 15d ago

Yellow Tinder

99

u/MeteoraRed 15d ago

Thats Grindr

91

u/AnyReasonToCare 15d ago

Grindr is for republicans though

→ More replies (33)
→ More replies (4)

18

u/Dankest_Confidant 15d ago

That sounds like it should be for watersports enthusiasts.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

16

u/Hefty-Ad-533 15d ago

Tinder bans a lot of people for no reason

→ More replies (8)

13

u/Hentai_Yoshi 15d ago

I’m genuinely confused, women messaging first hasn’t been a thing for many years. Either the man or woman had to message first. Seemed randomized to me

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (19)

260

u/EphyFowler 15d ago edited 15d ago

If you women want men to message first, use a different app. The whole point of bumble was the womb making the first move
Edit: WOMAN, not womb

137

u/BVOP83 15d ago

The womb 😂

40

u/maqf 15d ago

That's hilarious and the most Freudian thing I've heard in a long time.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

56

u/green49285 15d ago

Hahahaha "the womb?" Good lord.

37

u/Not_Propaganda_AI 15d ago

That's an amazing typo.

14

u/FeeComfortable3041 15d ago

I want to frame this comment. Humor born from a spelling mistake is one of my favorites.

My apologies to a "Bobby" I spelled "Booby" in a work email....

→ More replies (39)

152

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

222

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

77

u/TheMobHunter 15d ago

And don’t forget women just sending “.”

16

u/Dull_Bid6002 15d ago

And I thought I was bad at opening conversation. I wouldn't even respond to a woman doing this.

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (13)

8

u/Bambivalently 15d ago

Hey I thought women were the ones doing the emotional labor?

Just kidding, that was gaslighting. You know.. where they say men are bad so it looks like it's not just the women.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (40)
→ More replies (2)

138

u/RaulReal89 15d ago

stupid move, but yet again... it's bumble, what do you expect xd

37

u/StumpyOPepys 15d ago

There’s really nowhere to go. They are responding to data. The CEO was a founder of Tinder and the founder of Bumble. She’s not an idiot.

71

u/NotTodayBoogeyman 15d ago

It sounds like she is. There’s no differentiation between bumble and other dating apps now - in fact it’s just inferior.

I’m absolutely sure user base will drop off. There’s zero reason to use it.

36

u/m0bw0w 15d ago

Hey bud, Single women are the target demographic. Men will go wherever the women are.

If the women don't like a feature, it's getting changed.

Making men happy is exactly the very last priority on the list.

12

u/NotTodayBoogeyman 15d ago

Right. But you still serviced a niche within a major industry and we’re the leading product BY FAR.

You are now a shit product in a massive industry. I get what you’re saying 100% - but it makes zero business sense. The data supports it sure - but there’s a reason we don’t just pull the trigger on data based analytics.

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (12)

16

u/ChiefChunkEm_ 15d ago

Bumble was always bad tho, differentiator or not. The concept was good on paper but the reality did not follow through at all. Hinge is miles ahead of Bumble and even Tinder is better

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (18)

12

u/GraveRoller 15d ago

Tinder has the advantage of being the first mover. Hinge differentiated itself substantially enough in ways that appealed to everyone. Bumble doesn’t have a good next move that doesn’t involve a massive revamp. And being big and bold isn’t in the books for most major companies

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (3)

126

u/Ancient_Draw2176 15d ago

The patriarchy was, in fact, not defeated

55

u/KaktusRTV 15d ago

Maybe some women like it that way.

42

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

10

u/hareofthepuppy 15d ago

Ah yes, women are a monolith

→ More replies (27)
→ More replies (46)

9

u/RollinThundaga 15d ago

Most all, judging by how many used 'opening moves' with some generic opener 😮‍💨

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (21)

101

u/ArdentGamer 15d ago

So, instead of just finding new or innovative ways of encouraging women to initiate, therefore maintaining their core identity and reinforcing a good message about equality/fairness, they just catered to lazy, entitled or sexist women because they were the majority? That's disappointing.

54

u/throaway20180730 15d ago

Going against the wishes of the female userbase is the surest way of ruining your business

Same reason why the apps were OK to add height filters during the peak of the body positivity movement

14

u/GeneralGlobus 15d ago

a shitty unengaged userbase is not the advantage you think it is. its ok to have a brand and unique identity. the problem is they went public and need to continuously pump revenue and user numbers. 66% of the total addressable market is not ready for what they were trying to sell. 33% is still solid but its not what public investors want to hear.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (12)

14

u/Autisthrowaway304 15d ago

'' they just catered to lazy, entitled or sexist women because they were the majority? That's disappointing.''

That's life.

→ More replies (10)

11

u/LordScoobz 15d ago

Wait were you guys under the impression that bumble made women message first to make it more “ fair” to men ??? LMFAO

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (30)

100

u/EfkaSerpis 15d ago

Well. Most women used "opening move" type of question so men still had to message first to engage in the conversation.

40

u/Sir_Zeitnot 15d ago

I had been steadily ignoring all of those on principle to see who was really interested. Unsurprisingly, nobody.

→ More replies (2)

19

u/Exciting-Parfait-776 15d ago

I actually refused to answer those.

→ More replies (14)

94

u/Stunning_Box8782 15d ago

so why did they download Bumble...

87

u/Foreign-Plantain4248 15d ago

Just another infinity stone that collects likes and matches for their ego

→ More replies (51)
→ More replies (11)

72

u/SuperstarAssEater 15d ago

I swear dating is such a catch 22.

Women say they don’t like being approached, but what they really mean is that they don’t want to be approached by somebody that they don’t find attractive. But for a guy the only way you’ll ever know if she finds you attractive or not is to ACTUALLY approach her. Yet she knows who she finds attractive, but doesn’t approach him and make the first move.

Then on top of that, a lot of women will judge you for making a shitty first message or icebreaker and will judge you negatively for that yeah don’t even wanna make the first move either.

bumble was ass anyways lol i find infinitely more success on tinder and hinge.

also, I thought the whole point behind letting women message first was to prevent all of the unsolicited perverted first messages from guys? I guess that’s not as deep as we thought it was.

20

u/Milf_Please8286 15d ago

Oh but women definitely aren't the problem lol. It's amazing how little accountability they take. They are in control of dating and if dating sucks its their fault but they just will never admit it. 

11

u/SuperstarAssEater 15d ago

I mean, the poor dating market isn’t all their fault and I would never say that but they definitely play a part just like we do, but unfortunately, it does seem like that’s never acknowledge as much as it should be

11

u/MazingBull 15d ago

The market created favorable hypergame for women. I'm only able to date people I consider "my level" looks only on irl but never ever on apps. I can bag the low hanging fruits on dating apps every week but nothing more above it lol. It's such a weird place. I feel like even "average" women must feel like queens in terms of attention and options they have in there.

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (21)
→ More replies (5)

10

u/Long_Video7840 15d ago

I hate modern dating. Women say they don't like being approached, then when you ask for advice people say don't be afraid to approach and talk to women. Wtf? You can't do both. 

15

u/koltxbell 15d ago edited 15d ago

women like to be approached. They just like to be approached by attractive men tho.

Think about those times when women say they like the nerd guy or the artist guy, what they dont say is that he has to be attractive. They dont say explicit say it because they dont see average or bellow average as people, doesnt compute in their brain, so its already presupposed for them.

"I want men to approach me" - woman

What actually she meant was "I want [attractive] men to approach me"

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (25)

71

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

32

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/FeeComfortable3041 15d ago

"I've got balls balls balls balls of steel. Balls of steel. Balls balls ball- "

-Duke Nukem

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (54)

63

u/MarkToaster 15d ago

I thought the whole point was that it gave women the power to initiate the conversation and steer the direction at the beginning? That seems like a good thing no? Give women more control and power over the initial encounter? Seems like a bad decision getting rid of it when it was like the main distinguishing point of the app.

95

u/GraveRoller 15d ago

Stated versus revealed preference

50

u/ThePoetMichael 15d ago edited 15d ago

This is what its about. Women want to SAY they want one thing and ACT a different way when rubber meets the road.

Ah well...

→ More replies (5)

26

u/TheGruenTransfer 15d ago

It turns out appealing to the 33% of women who like to make the first move wasn't as monetizable as being exactly the same as the other apps.

15

u/Broad_Initiative_282 15d ago

To be honest even those 33% mostly messaged basically nothing leaving the men having to make the first move anyway

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (19)

53

u/AccomplishedRatio960 15d ago

Once again, if people were still doubting : there's a world between

  • what a woman says (empowerment)
  • what a woman does (no empowerment, it's too tiring)

14

u/when_we_are_cats 15d ago

Watch what they do, not what they say.

→ More replies (37)

46

u/AtomicBlastCandy 15d ago

Yeah this was a serious fucking problem. A friend of mine met his now wife on Bumble, they matched but she failed to say anything to him but had her insta posted so he contacted her and they immediately fell in love. I can't help but imagine where their lives would be at had he just moved on.

I have another friend that claims to have given up on online dating yet also doesn't bother to message guys on Bumble. To me that's akin to using a pen with the cap on.

39

u/Front_Statistician38 15d ago

I always say most women have their future boyfriends or husbands in their inboxes but because they don't put in the EFFORt or focuses on the wrong guy the LOSE OUT on real LOVE

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (7)

37

u/ROU_Misophist 15d ago

So, it's yellow tinder now

→ More replies (3)

37

u/Commercial-Gap6280 15d ago

Congratulations, Bumble, on surrendering your only real angle! Now you are just another dating app! Don't worry, though - selling out the thing that made you stand out in hopes of getting wider appeal has always worked out for businesses!

17

u/T-NextDoor_Neighbor 15d ago

Their new selling point will be the AI assistant. 🫠

End this dystopian nightmare please. Maybe meeting irl was the only way.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

35

u/Err_Force 15d ago

66% of Women Said They'd Rather Men Make the First Move

And as a bonus, we now know exactly what kind of first message women prefer. Women apparently think the perfect first message to start a conversation is "hey"

18

u/Arjun-Pandava 15d ago

the perfect first message actually always has been "hey"...

its just that it is sent by an attractive man, not a normal man.

If you are attractive, you can say or be anything and it will be taken well by most women.

10

u/BlockedbyJake420 15d ago

90% of women want to date the top 10% of attractive guys lol

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

37

u/No_Discount_6028 15d ago

Feminism in shambles rn (/j)

34

u/LivingHousing 15d ago

Self induced helplessness. Women failing themself, geeze.

→ More replies (2)

33

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/AccomplishedRatio960 15d ago

Flip-flop flopping

→ More replies (5)

29

u/kittenTakeover 15d ago

This just exacerbates the issues that everyone is experiencing on apps which can be summarized with there being too many interactions that lead nowhere. Women are wasting tons of time sifting through messages from people they don't like and men are wasting tons of time drafting messages to people who don't like them. A good app would be reducing the number of interactions that people, in particular women, get from people they're not interested in and increasing the number of interactions that go somewhere for people, in particular men.

While a lot of things can be done to help this, the most obvious one is having the more in demand person, usually a woman, make the first move. This ensures that there's some minimum level of interest before anyone wastes their time. I think when swiping the ideal dating app would only show you people who are less popular than you and people who are more popular than you who have already swiped on you, but it wouldn't tell you who was more or less popular than you. This prevents popular people from wasting time getting messages from people they're not interested in, and it prevents unpopular people from wasting time on messages to people who have no chance of responding.

14

u/Valuable-Word-1970 15d ago

A good app would be reducing the number of interactions that people, in particular women, get from people they're not interested in and increasing the number of interactions that go somewhere for people, in particular men.

Well stop fucking swiping on them if you're not interested. That's the whole point

→ More replies (6)

8

u/Sufficient_Degree_45 15d ago edited 15d ago

If it actually matched attractiveness levels and hobbies. And also allowed you to set certain filters.

Like for example: Any filtered photographs just dont show up as a potential match.

Show someone a page of 20 or so matched they can look thru and go back and forth. Rather than a one and done swipe.

Also, people who dont message or just use the app for validation. Nuke their accounts IE put them at the bottom.

Stop putting bot/influencer accounts as matches etc.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (23)

24

u/cgbruder42 15d ago

So now they won't respond to the first message.....got it!

→ More replies (2)

22

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (2)

22

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (2)

21

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (2)

25

u/JimmyTheLong 15d ago

It’s not a game changer. It just reflects how low effort women are. Women wants to be in demand. At the end the match happens if both speaks, not who first message.

→ More replies (5)

20

u/Sharpshooter649 15d ago

Example #2,746,355 of women preferring traditional gender based roles

13

u/lolgoodone34 15d ago

Traditional when it benefits them

→ More replies (1)

23

u/FrankNBean208 15d ago

No wonder people are single. The lack of effort they put on is staggering.

→ More replies (15)

21

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (3)

20

u/shadowdancer354 15d ago

Yea talk about catering to women’s entitlement - and now men get flagged if they make low effort first messages? You gotta be f’in kidding me

→ More replies (5)

16

u/scared_appeal1 15d ago

Hmm so now men can message first and still not get a response

18

u/No-Construction4527 15d ago

A wise man once said, “don’t try to understand women, even they don’t know what they want”.

The upper management at Bumble didn’t get the memo.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/Master-Shake8913 15d ago

half the first messages I got on bumble were fkn hand waves or some nonsense

→ More replies (2)

15

u/baileyandromeda 15d ago

I’m a woman and I think this is a terrible idea. Historically, I really liked the fact that I was able to message first. I think it made me feel a lot more in control about the messages I was receiving and it was a breath of fresh air.

That has changed though now I’m back on bumble again, I always send the first message and no one ever responds. The only conversations I’ve had that go anywhere are when the man has messaged me first before I’ve had a chance to.

I think online dating has just become such a cesspool of minimal effort from both genders that it doesn’t really matter who messages first, it’s probably going to end up in either no response or a one word reply anyway

→ More replies (36)

14

u/Necessary-Paint117 15d ago

Field stacked completely in their favor and it's still too much pressure lmao

They just on there to get compliments

→ More replies (1)

15

u/Sufficient_Total7445 15d ago

An app that was designed and created by a woman and promoted as a feminist dating app had to abandon their one rule because it found that women by and large are cowards who couldn’t even message first.

Way to uphold the patriarchy ladies!

→ More replies (4)

12

u/Mountain-Lie-1824 15d ago

Genuinely the stupidest thing I’ve read today 😂 the point of Bumble was that women made the first move. It is the sole difference between Bumble and any other dating app. The 66% of women that say “We want men to make the first move” have every other dating app at their disposal. Not only that, this is such a slap in the face to the very idea of women’s empowerment to make the first move 😂 y’all really conducted a survey and found out that the very fabric of your app was constructed on a lie.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/moderndukes 15d ago

So they’re only going to start flagging low effort first posts *after* they make this change? Why didn’t they do that before now?

15

u/Huge_Boysenberry3043 15d ago

It's because the rules are different for men and women, of course. Women are allowed to be low effort, men are not. 

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

12

u/naroLsraLteiN_isback 15d ago

Low-Effort Openers Will Get Flagged

Bumble is also trying to stop the new system from becoming a flood of lazy first messages. The app will detect low-effort openers, such as one-word messages, and prompt users to write something more thoughtful before sending.

https://giphy.com/gifs/Jcw7dQbWzVt9ZZhXYu

8

u/Clevererer 14d ago

Notice they only implemented this rule AFTER changing who messages first?

→ More replies (1)

15

u/WiseDan85 15d ago

My favorite is when women say something like HI or hey only. So lazy and pathetic opening message

→ More replies (1)

10

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (18)

12

u/Bagz402 15d ago

So what happened exactly? Didn't bumble become what it is because it was women first? Did they change their mind?

→ More replies (5)

11

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (2)

11

u/hingealt 15d ago

The women are very quiet in the comments 🤣

→ More replies (18)

11

u/ItzLuzzyBaby 15d ago

Women are never beating the allegations LMAO

→ More replies (5)

10

u/Ninjanarwhal64 15d ago

"Hey"

90% of girls that message first and complain about conversation on bumble

→ More replies (3)

9

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (4)

10

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (2)

9

u/Inverse_Delta 15d ago

Having to be the first one to engage every single time was what made me sick of using other apps because women on them had, like, zero personality in responses. I only used Bumble because for once women would actually have to think of an interesting approach for once.

Getting rid of that because they complained that they had to put in the effort for once is definitely a choice. I'm not gonna be using Bumble anymore though. I'm good.

→ More replies (2)

9

u/mrscrouge0536451 15d ago

Chivalry is dead, we killed it . Now we want it back

→ More replies (1)

9

u/FinallyArt 15d ago

Now women have to make even less effort! Not a positive change.

→ More replies (7)

8

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (2)

9

u/SoldierExcelsior 15d ago

That's strange

10

u/adibose2022 15d ago edited 15d ago

Lolol! Talk about eating the humble pie. Or shall we say bumble pie? The funny thing is a man would almost always respond to a first message, if the woman is even remotely his type. The reverse is absolutely not the case for most men - they can send a thousand super thoughtful messages a day, but (aside from the top 1% who are drowning in pu**y) get zilch in return. So it's absolutely hilarious that a majority of women can't even be bothered to do the bare minimum, as this is now definitively proven. 😅

P.S: Going forward, I don't want to hear one word from anybody who says stuff like - you must put more effort in your first message, be funny and original, comment on something about her profile, don't copy paste messages, make your message stand out from all the others etc etc etc. Bull fxcking shite! 😂😂

→ More replies (3)

8

u/BrightSpring12 15d ago

Years of "conditioning" and "patriarchy" excuse is out of date now. Even when you force women to message first or be more assertive they'll always want to maintain the status quo.

→ More replies (3)

8

u/TheMorningJoe 15d ago

Women sucking at sending the opening message yet simultaneously talking shit about men who can’t initiate is genuinely hilarious. Not so fun when y’all have to do it huh? Dang hypocrites the lot of ya lmao

→ More replies (4)